Effects of fabrication parameters on viscoelastic shear modulus of 2,3-dialdehydecellulose membranes—Potential scaffolds for vocal fold lamina propria tissue engineering
Priyanka RoyChowdhury
Division of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sarah Klemuk
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IASearch for more papers by this authorIngo Titze
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
National Center for Voice and Speech, The Denver Center for the Performing Arts, Denver, CO
Search for more papers by this authorVijay Kumar
Division of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Search for more papers by this authorPriyanka RoyChowdhury
Division of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sarah Klemuk
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IASearch for more papers by this authorIngo Titze
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
National Center for Voice and Speech, The Denver Center for the Performing Arts, Denver, CO
Search for more papers by this authorVijay Kumar
Division of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Porous 2,3-dialdehydecellulose (2,3-DAC) membranes were investigated for use as a synthetic scaffold for engineering vocal fold-like tissues. Two criteria of this application are (i) the viscoelastic shear properties of the scaffold should be controllable in the range of vocal fold tissues and (ii) scaffolds should remain biomechanically stable to withstand vibrational stresses in a bioreactor. Porous 2,3-DAC membranes were fabricated from methylolcellulose by water-induced cellulose regeneration, with or without sodium chloride leaching, followed by periodate oxidation. They were freeze-dried and ethylene oxide-sterilized. Different degrees of oxidation were obtained on reacting with sodium metaperiodate for different time points. Rheological studies were performed to investigate the effect of freeze-drying, porosity, degree of oxidation, sterilization, and incubation time on elastic and viscous shear moduli, G′ and G″, respectively, for frequencies 0.01–10 Hz. Freeze drying increased G′ and G″, while increased porosity and degree of oxidation reduced G′ and G″. Sterilization had no effect on viscoelasticity. When incubated in Dulbecco's minimum essential medium at 37°C, membranes with 6–7% and 19–20% oxidation disintegrated after 7 and 3 days, respectively, while membranes with 3–4% oxidation showed little viscoelastic change over a period of 42 days. The upper frequency limit of rheologic measurement was a limitation of the study and should be addressed in future investigations. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009
References
- 1 Roy N,Merrill RM,Thibeault SL,Parsa RA,Gray SD,Smith EM. Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2004; 47: 281–293.
- 2 Krischke S,Weigelt S,Hoppe U,Köllner V,Klotz M,Eysholdt U,Rosanowski F. Quality of life in dysphonic patients. J Voice 2005; 19: 132–137.
- 3 Chan RW,Titze IR. Viscoelastic shear properties of human vocal fold mucosa: Theoretical characterization based on constitutive modeling. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107: 565–580.
- 4 Titze IR. Biomechanics and distributed mass models. In: KN Stevens, M Hirano, editors. Vocal Fold Physiology. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press; 1981. p 245–270.
- 5 Chan RW,Titze IR. Dependence of phonation threshold pressure on vocal tract acoustics and vocal fold tissue mechanics. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119: 2351–2362.
- 6 Ford CN. Advances and refinements in phonosurgery. Laryngoscope 1999; 109: 1891–1900.
- 7 Caton T,Thibeault SL,Klemuk S,Smith ME. Viscoelasticity of hyaluronan and nonhyaluronan based vocal fold injectables: Implications for mucosal versus muscle use. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 516–521.
- 8 Chan RW. Shear Properties of Vocal Fold Mucosal Tissues and Their Effect on Vocal Fold Oscillation. [Speech and Hearing Science]. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa; 1998.
- 9 Watterson T,McFarlane S,Menicucci A. Vibratory characteristics of Teflon injected and noninjected paralyzed vocal folds. J Speech Hear Disord 1990; 55: 61–66.
- 10 Klemuk SA,Titze IR. Viscoelastic properties of three vocal-fold injectable biomaterials at low audio frequencies. Laryngoscope 2004; 114: 1597–1603.
- 11 Flint PW,Cummings CW. Phonosurgical procedures. In: CS Cummings, JM Fredrickson, LA Harker, CJ Krause, editors. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1998. p 2073–2095.
- 12 Kanemaru S,Nakamura T,Omori K,Kojima H,Magrufov A,Hiratsuka Y,Hirano S,Ito S,Shimizu Y. Regeneration of the vocal fold using autologous mesenchymal stem cells. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003; 112: 915–920.
- 13 Duflo S,Thibeault SL,Li W,Shu XZ,Prestwich GD. Vocal fold tissue repair in vivo using a synthetic extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng 2006; 12: 2171–2180.
- 14 Shu XZ,Liu Y,Palumbo FS,Luo Y,Prestwich GD. In situ crosslinkable hyaluronan hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 1339–1348.
- 15 Webb K,Li W,Hitchcock RW,Smeal RM,Gray SD,Tresco PA. Comparison of human fibroblast ECM-related gene expression on elastic three-dimensional substrates relative to two-dimensional films of the same material. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4681–4690.
- 16 Titze IR,Hitchcock RW,Broadhead K,Webb K,Li W,Gray SD,Tresco PA. Design and validation of a bioreactor for engineering vocal fold tissues under combined tensile and vibrational stresses. J Biomech 2004; 37: 1521–1529.
- 17 Chan RW. Measurements of vocal fold tissue viscoelasticity: Approaching the male phonatory frequency range. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115: 3161–3170.
- 18 Dahlqvist A,Garskog O,Laurent C,Hertegard S,Ambrosio L,Borzacchiello A. Viscoelasticity of rabbit vocal folds after injection augmentation. Laryngoscope 2004; 114: 138–142.
- 19 Hansen JK,Thibeault SL,Walsh JF,Shu XZ,Prestwich GD. In vivo engineering of the vocal fold extracellular matrix with injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogels: Early effects on tissue repair and biomechanics in a rabbit model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2005; 114: 662–670.
- 20 Hertegard S,Dahlqvist A,Laurent C,Borzacchiello A,Ambrosio L. Viscoelastic properties of rabbit vocal folds after augmentation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128: 401–406.
- 21 Thibeault SL,Gray SD,Bless DM,Chan RW,Ford CN. Histologic and rheologic characterization of vocal fold scarring. J Voice 2002; 16: 96–104.
- 22 Min Y,Titze IR,Alipour-Haghighi F. Stress–strain response of the human vocal fold ligament. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 104: 563–569.
- 23 Titze IR,Klemuk SA,Gray S. Methodology for rheological testing of engineered biomaterials at low audio frequencies. JAcoust Soc Am 2004; 115: 392–401.
- 24 Singh MS,Ray AR,Vasudevan P,Verma K,Guha SK. Potential biosoluble carriers: Biocompatibility and biodegradability of oxidized cellulose. Biomater Med Dev Artif Organs 1979; 7: 495–512.
- 25 Singh MS,Vasudevan P,Ray AR. Biodegradation studies on periodate oxidized cellulose. Biomaterials 1982; 3: 16–20.
- 26 Frederick EW,Rabkin MT,Richie RHJr,Smith LHJr. Studies on primary hypoxaluria. I. In vivo demonstration of a defect in glycoxylate metabolism. New Engl J Med 1963; 269: 821–829.
- 27 Dekker EE. Bioorganic Chemistry. New York: Academic Press; 1977.
- 28 Bala K,Guha SK,Vasudevan P. p-Amino salicylic acid-oxidized cellulose system: A model for long-term drug delivery. Biomaterials 1982; 3: 97–100.
- 29 Singh M,Vasudevan P,Sinha TJ,Ray AR,Guha MM. An insulin delivery system from oxidized cellulose. J Biomed Mater Res 1981; 15: 655–661.
- 30 Leemputten EV,Horisberger M. Immobilization of trypsin on partially oxidized cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 1974; 16: 997–1003.
- 31 Valcheva E,Draganova R,Valchev I,Alexiev B. Kinetics of the immobilization of a-chemotrypsin enzyme on dialdehydecellulose. Cell Chem Technol 1987; 21: 581–587.
- 32 Singh M,Vasudevan P. Biosoluble polymer for drug delivery. Makromol Chem 1980; 181: 2433–2439.
- 33 Syamala DK,Sinha TJ,Vasudevan P. Biosoluble surgical material from 2,3-dialdehydecellulose. Biomaterials 1986; 7: 193–196.
- 34 RoyChowdhury P,Kumar V. Fabrication and evaluation of porous 2,3-dialdehydecellulose membranes as potential biodegradable tissue engineering scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 76: 300–309.
- 35 Maekawa E,Koshijima T. Properties of 2,3-dicarboxy cellulose combined with various metallic ions. J Appl Polym Sci 1984; 29: 2289–2297.
- 36 Klemuk SA. Methodological Improvements in Mechanical Measurement of Vocal Fold-Related Tissues [Speech and Hearing Science]. Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa; 2007.
- 37 Kremer RD,Tabb D. The beneficially interactive support medium for diagnostic test development. Am Lab 1990; 22: 136–143.
- 38 Deschamps AA. Design of segmented poly(ether ester) materials and structures for tissue engineering applications. J Control Release 2002; 78: 175–186.
- 39 Manabe S,Iwata H,Kamide K. Dynamic mechanical absorptions observed for regenerated cellulose solids in the temperature range of 280 to 600 K. Polym J 1986; 18: 1–14.
- 40 MooneyDJ,Langer R. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1995.
- 41 Chapekar MS. Tissue engineering: Challenges and opportunities. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53: 617–620.