Volume 147, Issue 2 pp. 440-447
Cancer Therapy and Prevention

Baseline findings and safety of infrequent vs. frequent screening of human papillomavirus vaccinated women

Karolina Louvanto

Corresponding Author

Karolina Louvanto

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

Correspondence to: Karolina Louvanto, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Tiina Eriksson

Tiina Eriksson

Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Penelope Gray

Penelope Gray

Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Dan Apter

Dan Apter

VL-Medi Clinical Research Center, Family Federation Finland, Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Iacopo Baussano

Iacopo Baussano

Infections and Cancer Epidemiology Group, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author
Anne Bly

Anne Bly

Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Katja Harjula

Katja Harjula

Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Kaisa Heikkilä

Kaisa Heikkilä

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Mari Hokkanen

Mari Hokkanen

Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Leila Huhtinen

Leila Huhtinen

Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Marja Ikonen

Marja Ikonen

Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Heidi Karttunen

Heidi Karttunen

Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Mervi Nummela

Mervi Nummela

Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Anna Söderlund-Strand

Anna Söderlund-Strand

Department of Clinical Microbiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Ulla Veivo

Ulla Veivo

Department of Health Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Joakim Dillner

Joakim Dillner

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Miriam Elfstöm

Miriam Elfstöm

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Pekka Nieminen

Pekka Nieminen

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Matti Lehtinen

Matti Lehtinen

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 November 2019
Citations: 12
Conflict of interest: DA, JD and ML have previously received grants from Merck & Co. Inc. or Genomica or Roche or the GSK group of companies through their employers (Family Federation Finland [DA], Karolinska Institute [JD] and University of Tampere [ML]). The other co-authors have no conflicts of interest. The authors are solely responsible for the final content of the manuscript and interpretation.

Abstract

Less frequent cervical cancer screening in human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinated birth cohorts could produce considerable savings without increasing cervical cancer incidence and loss of life-years. We report here the baseline findings and interim results of safety and accuracy of infrequent screening among HPV16/18 vaccinated females. The entire 1992–1994 birth-cohorts (30,139 females) were invited to a community-randomized HPV16/18-vaccination trial. A total of 9,482 female trial participants received HPV16/18-vaccination in 2007–2009 at age of 13–15. At age 22, 4,273 (45%) of these females consented to attend a randomized trial on frequent (ages 22/25/28; Arm 1: 2,073 females) vs. infrequent screening (age 28; Arm 2: 2,200 females) in 2014–2017. Females (1,329), who had got HPV16/18 vaccination at age 18 comprised the safety Arm 3. Baseline prevalence and incidence of HPV16/18 and other high-risk HPV types were: 0.5% (53/1,000 follow-up years, 104) and 25% (2,530/104) in the frequently screened Arm 1; 0.2% (23/104) and 24% (2,413/104) in the infrequently screened Arm 2; and 3.1% (304/104) and 23% (2,284/104) in the safety Arm 3. Corresponding prevalence of HSIL/ASC-H and of any abnormal cytological findings were: 0.3 and 4.2% (Arm 1), 0.4 and 5.3% (Arm 2) and 0.3 and 4.7% (Arm 3). Equally rare HSIL/CIN3 findings in the infrequently screened safety Arm A3 (0.4%) and in the frequently screened Arm 1 (0.4%) indicate no safety concerns on infrequent screening despite the up to 10 times higher HPV16/18 baseline prevalence and incidence in the former.

Abstract

What's new?

As the first generation of girls vaccinated against HPV reach adulthood, it's time to re-evaluate screening recommendations. Reducing the frequency of screenings could save money without increasing cervical cancer incidence. Here, the authors collected baseline data on the safety of less frequent cervical cancer screenings. They conducted a randomized trial of Finnish women born in 1992-1994 and vaccinated against HPV16/18, in which participants are screened either once or three times by age 28. At baseline and the first safety interim analyses they found no difference in the incidence of HSIL/CIN3 lesions between the two groups, suggesting that infrequent screening for HPV-vaccinated women does not compromise safety.

Data availability

After completion of the trial in 2025, anonymous data is available with the principal investigator at FICAN-Mid.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.