RAD51 as a potential surrogate marker for DNA repair capacity in solid malignancies
Mariam Gachechiladze
Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Translational and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
M.G. and J.Š. share first authorship
Search for more papers by this authorJosef Škarda
Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Translational and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
M.G. and J.Š. share first authorship
Search for more papers by this authorAlex Soltermann
Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Markus Joerger
Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital, St.Gallen, Switzerland
Correspondence to: Markus Joerger, MD-PhD, ClinPharm, Department of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, CH-9007 St.Gallen, Switzerland, Tel.: +41-765591070, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMariam Gachechiladze
Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Translational and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
M.G. and J.Š. share first authorship
Search for more papers by this authorJosef Škarda
Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Translational and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
M.G. and J.Š. share first authorship
Search for more papers by this authorAlex Soltermann
Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Markus Joerger
Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Cantonal Hospital, St.Gallen, Switzerland
Correspondence to: Markus Joerger, MD-PhD, ClinPharm, Department of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, CH-9007 St.Gallen, Switzerland, Tel.: +41-765591070, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorConflict of Interest Statement: None declared.
Abstract
Targeting deficient mechanisms of cellular DNA repair still represents the basis for the treatment of the majority of solid tumors, and increased DNA repair capacity is a hallmark mechanism of resistance not only to DNA-damaging treatments such as cytotoxic drugs and radiotherapy, but also to small molecule targeted drugs such as inhibitors of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP). Hence, there is substantial medical need for potent and convenient biomarkers of individual response to DNA-targeted treatment in personalized cancer care. RAD51 is a highly conserved protein that catalyzes DNA repair via homologous recombination, a major DNA repair pathway which directly modulates cellular sensitivity to DNA-damaging treatments. The clinical and biological significance of RAD51 protein expression is still under investigation. Pre-clinical studies consistently show the important role of nuclear RAD51 immunoreactivity in chemo- and radioresistance. Validating data from clinical trials however is limited at present, and some clinical studies show controversial results. This review gives a comprehensive overview on the current knowledge about the prognostic and predictive value of RAD51 protein expression and genetic variability in patients with solid malignancies.
REFERENCES
- 1Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011; 144: 646–74.
- 2Chernikova SB, Game JC, Brown JM. Inhibiting homologous recombination for cancer therapy. Cancer Biol Ther 2012; 13: 61–8.
- 3Bartkova J, Horejsi Z, Koed K, et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature 2005; 434: 864–70.
- 4Fong PC, Boss DS, Yap TA, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 123–34.
- 5Turner N, Tutt A, Ashworth A. Hallmarks of 'BRCAness' in sporadic cancers. Nat Rev Cancer 2004; 4: 814–9.
- 6Lord CJ, Ashworth A. BRCAness revisited. Nat Rev Cancer 2016; 16: 110–20.
- 7Mateo J, Carreira S, Sandhu S, et al. DNA-Repair Defects and Olaparib in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1697–708.
- 8Lord CJ, Ashworth A. The DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Nat 2012; 481: 287–94.
- 9Baumann P, West SC. Role of the human RAD51 protein in homologous recombination and double-stranded-break repair. Trends Biochem Sci 1998; 23: 247–51.
- 10Henning W, Sturzbecher HW. Homologous recombination and cell cycle checkpoints: Rad51 in tumour progression and therapy resistance. Toxicology 2003; 193: 91–109.
- 11Krejci L, Altmannova V, Spirek M, et al. Homologous recombination and its regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: 5795–818.
- 12Vispe S, Defais M. Mammalian Rad51 protein: a RecA homologue with pleiotropic functions. Biochimie 1997; 79: 587–92.
- 13Tarsounas M, Davies AA, West SC. RAD51 localization and activation following DNA damage. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2004; 359: 87–93.
- 14Haaf T, Golub EI, Reddy G, et al. Nuclear foci of mammalian Rad51 recombination protein in somatic cells after DNA damage and its localization in synaptonemal complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1995; 92: 2298–302.
- 15Tashiro S, Walter J, Shinohara A, et al. Rad51 accumulation at sites of DNA damage and in postreplicative chromatin. J Cell Biol 2000; 150: 283–91.
- 16Arias-Lopez C, Lazaro-Trueba I, Kerr P, et al. p53 modulates homologous recombination by transcriptional regulation of the RAD51 gene. EMBO Rep 2006; 7: 219–24.
- 17Scully R, Chen J, Plug A, et al. Association of BRCA1 with Rad51 in mitotic and meiotic cells. Cell 1997; 88: 265–75.
- 18Carreira A, Hilario J, Amitani I, et al. The BRC repeats of BRCA2 modulate the DNA-binding selectivity of RAD51. Cell 2009; 136: 1032–43.
- 19Feng Z, Zhang J. A dual role of BRCA1 in two distinct homologous recombination mediated repair in response to replication arrest. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40: 726–38.
- 20Nakada S, Yonamine RM, Matsuo K. RNF8 regulates assembly of RAD51 at DNA double-strand breaks in the absence of BRCA1 and 53BP1. Cancer Res 2012; 72: 4974–83.
- 21Klein HL. The consequences of Rad51 overexpression for normal and tumor cells. DNA Repair 2008; 7: 686–93.
- 22Ward A, Khanna KK, Wiegmans AP. Targeting homologous recombination, new pre-clinical and clinical therapeutic combinations inhibiting RAD51. Cancer Treat Rev 2015; 41: 35–45.
- 23Adam-Zahir S, Plowman PN, Bourton EC, et al. Increased gamma-H2AX and Rad51 DNA repair biomarker expression in human cell lines resistant to the chemotherapeutic agents nitrogen mustard and cisplatin. Chemotherapy 2014; 60: 310–20.
- 24Wiegmans AP, Yap PY, Ward A, et al. Differences in expression of key DNA damage repair genes after epigenetic-induced BRCAness dictate synthetic lethality with PARP1 inhibition. Mol Cancer Ther 2015; 14: 2321–31.
- 25Yang Z, Waldman AS, Wyatt MD. Expression and regulation of RAD51 mediate cellular responses to chemotherapeutics. Biochem Pharmacol 2012; 83: 741–6.
- 26Ito M, Yamamoto S, Nimura K, et al. Rad51 siRNA delivered by HVJ envelope vector enhances the anti-cancer effect of cisplatin. J Gene Med 2005; 7: 1044–52.
- 27Birkelbach M, Ferraiolo N, Gheorghiu L, et al. Detection of impaired homologous recombination repair in NSCLC cells and tissues. J Thorac Oncol 2013; 8: 279–86.
- 28Shah MM, Dobbin ZC, Nowsheen S, et al. An ex vivo assay of XRT-induced Rad51 foci formation predicts response to PARP-inhibition in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 134: 331–7.
- 29Zhang BB, Wang DG, Xuan C, et al. Genetic 135G/C polymorphism of RAD51 gene and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis of 28,956 cases and 28,372 controls. Familial Cancer 2014; 13: 515–26.
- 30Zhao M, Chen P, Dong Y, et al. Relationship between Rad51 G135C and G172T variants and the susceptibility to cancer: a meta-analysis involving 54 case-control studies. PloS One 2014; 9: e87259.
- 31Levy-Lahad E, Lahad A, Eisenberg S, et al. A single nucleotide polymorphism in the RAD51 gene modifies cancer risk in BRCA2 but not BRCA1 carriers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 3232–6.
- 32Nogueira A, Catarino R, Coelho A, et al. Influence of DNA repair RAD51 gene variants in overall survival of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first line chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2010; 66: 501–6.
- 33Marsden CG, Jensen RB, Zagelbaum J, et al. The tumor-associated variant RAD51 G151D induces a hyper-recombination phenotype. PLoS Genet 2016; 12: e1006208.
- 34Soderlund Leifler K, Asklid A, Fornander T, et al. The RAD51 135G>C polymorphism is related to the effect of adjuvant therapy in early breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2015; 141: 797–804.
- 35Jiang YH, Xu XL, Ruan HH, et al. The impact of functional LIG4 polymorphism on platinum-based chemotherapy response and survival in non-small cell lung cancer. Med Oncol (Northwood, London, England) 2014; 31: 959.
- 36Osti MF, Nicosia L, Agolli L, et al. Potential role of single nucleotide polymorphisms of XRCC1, XRCC3, and RAD51 in predicting acute toxicity in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol 2015.
- 37Gonzalez R, Silva JM, Dominguez G, et al. Detection of loss of heterozygosity at RAD51, RAD52, RAD54 and BRCA1 and BRCA2 loci in breast cancer: pathological correlations. Br J Cancer 1999; 81: 503–9.
- 38Schmutte C, Tombline G, Rhiem K, et al. Characterization of the human Rad51 genomic locus and examination of tumors with 15q14–15 loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Cancer Res 1999; 59: 4564–9.
- 39Wick W, Petersen I, Schmutzler RK, et al. Evidence for a novel tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 15 associated with progression to a metastatic stage in breast cancer. Oncogene 1996; 12: 973–8.
- 40Cerami E, Gao J, Dogrusoz U, et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov 2012; 2: 401–4.
- 41Gao J, Aksoy BA, Dogrusoz U, et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci Signal 2013; 6: pl1.
- 42Mitra A, Jameson C, Barbachano Y, et al. Overexpression of RAD51 occurs in aggressive prostatic cancer. Histopathology 2009; 55: 696–704.
- 43Maacke H, Jost K, Opitz S, et al. DNA repair and recombination factor Rad51 is over-expressed in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Oncogene 2000; 19: 2791–5.
- 44Maacke H, Opitz S, Jost K, et al. Over-expression of wild-type Rad51 correlates with histological grading of invasive ductal breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2000; 88: 907–13.
- 45Qiao GB, Wu YL, Yang XN, et al. High-level expression of Rad51 is an independent prognostic marker of survival in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Br J Cancer 2005; 93: 137–43.
- 46Tennstedt P, Fresow R, Simon R, et al. RAD51 overexpression is a negative prognostic marker for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer 2013; 132: 2118–26.
- 47Li Y, Yu H, Luo RZ, et al. Elevated expression of Rad51 is correlated with decreased survival in resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2011; 104: 617–22.
- 48Nakanoko T, Saeki H, Morita M, et al. Rad51 expression is a useful predictive factor for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21: 597–604.
- 49Soderlund K, Skoog L, Fornander T, et al. The BRCA1/BRCA2/Rad51 complex is a prognostic and predictive factor in early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 2007; 84: 242–51.
- 50Sosinska-Mielcarek K, Duchnowska R, Winczura P, et al. Immunohistochemical prediction of brain metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: the role of Rad51. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 2013; 22: 1178–83.
- 51Woditschka S, Evans L, Duchnowska R, et al. DNA double-strand break repair genes and oxidative damage in brain metastasis of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014; 106.
- 52Connell PP, Jayathilaka K, Haraf DJ, et al. Pilot study examining tumor expression of RAD51 and clinical outcomes in human head cancers. Int J Oncol 2006; 28: 1113–9.
- 53Mullane SA, Werner L, Guancial EA, et al. Expression levels of DNA damage repair proteins are associated with overall survival in platinum-treated advanced urothelial carcinoma. Clin Genitourinary Cancer 2016; 14: 352–9.
- 54Ihara K, Yamaguchi S, Ueno N, et al. Expression of DNA double-strand break repair proteins predicts the response and prognosis of colorectal cancer patients undergoing oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Oncol Rep 2016; 35: 1349–55.
- 55Honrado E, Osorio A, Palacios J, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of DNA repair proteins in familial breast cancer differentiate BRCA2-associated tumors. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 7503–11.
- 56Alshareeda AT, Negm OH, Aleskandarany MA, et al. Clinical and biological significance of RAD51 expression in breast cancer: a key DNA damage response protein. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 159: 41–53.
- 57Gachechiladze M, Škarda J, Kolek V, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of loss of nuclear RAD51 immunoreactivity in resected non-small cell lung cancer patients. Lung Cancer 2017; 105: 31–38.
- 58Graeser M, McCarthy A, Lord CJ, et al. A marker of homologous recombination predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2010; 16: 6159–68.
- 59Willers H, Taghian AG, Luo CM, et al. Utility of DNA repair protein foci for the detection of putative BRCA1 pathway defects in breast cancer biopsies. Mol Cancer Res 2009; 7: 1304–9.
- 60Mukhopadhyay A, Plummer ER, Elattar A, et al. Clinicopathological features of homologous recombination-deficient epithelial ovarian cancers: sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, platinum, and survival. Cancer Res 2012; 72: 5675–82.
- 61Naipal KA, Verkaik NS, Ameziane N, et al. Functional ex vivo assay to select homologous recombination-deficient breast tumors for PARP inhibitor treatment. Clin Cancer Res 2014; 20: 4816–26.
- 62Patterson MJ, Sutton RE, Forrest I, et al. Assessing the function of homologous recombination DNA repair in malignant pleural effusion (MPE) samples. Br J Cancer 2014; 111: 94–100.
- 63Takenaka T, Yoshino I, Kouso H, et al. Combined evaluation of Rad51 and ERCC1 expressions for sensitivity to platinum agents in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer 2007; 121: 895–900.
- 64Nickoloff JA. DNA Repair Dysregulation in Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Synthetic Lethal Opportunities. The Netherlands: Springer, 2015. 7–28.
- 65Furuta T, Ueda T, Aune G, et al. Transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair as a determinant of cisplatin sensitivity of human cells. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 4899–902.
- 66Hine CM, Seluanov A, Gorbunova V. Use of the Rad51 promoter for targeted anti-cancer therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 20810–5.
- 67Nagathihalli NS, Nagaraju G. RAD51 as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011; 1816: 209–18.
- 68Hannay JA, Liu J, Zhu QS, et al. Rad51 overexpression contributes to chemoresistance in human soft tissue sarcoma cells: a role for p53/activator protein 2 transcriptional regulation. Mol Cancer Ther 2007; 6: 1650–60.
- 69Raderschall E, Stout K, Freier S, et al. Elevated levels of Rad51 recombination protein in tumor cells. Cancer Res 2002; 62: 219–25.
- 70Martin RW, Orelli BJ, Yamazoe M, et al. RAD51 up-regulation bypasses BRCA1 function and is a common feature of BRCA1-deficient breast tumors. Cancer Res 2007; 67: 9658–65.
- 71Welsh JW, Ellsworth RK, Kumar R, et al. Rad51 protein expression and survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74: 1251–5.