Volume 129, Issue 1 pp. 78-87
Cancer Genetics

Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis of bladder cancer reveals an additive diagnostic value of FGFR3 mutations and hypermethylation events

Reza R. Serizawa

Reza R. Serizawa

Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark

Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Ulrik Ralfkiær

Ulrik Ralfkiær

Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Kenneth Steven

Kenneth Steven

Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Gitte W. Lam

Gitte W. Lam

Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Sven Schmiedel

Sven Schmiedel

Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Joachim Schüz

Joachim Schüz

Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Alastair B. Hansen

Alastair B. Hansen

Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas Horn

Thomas Horn

Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Per Guldberg

Corresponding Author

Per Guldberg

Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark

Fax: 45-3525-7721

Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen DK2100, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 07 September 2010
Citations: 76

Abstract

The bladder cancer genome harbors numerous oncogenic mutations and aberrantly methylated gene promoters. The aim of our study was to generate a profile of these alterations and investigate their use as biomarkers in urine sediments for noninvasive detection of bladder cancer. We systematically screened FGFR3, PIK3CA, TP53, HRAS, NRAS and KRAS for mutations and quantitatively assessed the methylation status of APC, ARF, DBC1, INK4A, RARB, RASSF1A, SFRP1, SFRP2, SFRP4, SFRP5 and WIF1 in a prospective series of tumor biopsies (N = 105) and urine samples (N = 113) from 118 bladder tumor patients. We also analyzed urine samples from 33 patients with noncancerous urinary lesions. A total of 95 oncogenic mutations and 189 hypermethylation events were detected in the 105 tumor biopsies. The total panel of markers provided a sensitivity of 93%, whereas mutation and methylation markers alone provided sensitivities of 72% and 70%, respectively. In urine samples, the sensitivity was 70% for all markers, 50% for mutation markers and 52% for methylation markers. FGFR3 mutations occurred more frequently in tumors with no methylation events than in tumors with one or more methylation events (78% vs. 33%; p < 0.0001). FGFR3 mutation in combination with three methylation markers (APC, RASSF1A and SFRP2) provided a sensitivity of 90% in tumors and 62% in urine with 100% specificity. These results suggest an inverse correlation between FGFR3 mutations and hypermethylation events, which may be used to improve noninvasive, DNA-based detection of bladder cancer.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.