Integrated genetic and epigenetic analysis of bladder cancer reveals an additive diagnostic value of FGFR3 mutations and hypermethylation events
Reza R. Serizawa
Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorUlrik Ralfkiær
Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorKenneth Steven
Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorGitte W. Lam
Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorSven Schmiedel
Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorJoachim Schüz
Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorAlastair B. Hansen
Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorThomas Horn
Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Per Guldberg
Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
Fax: 45-3525-7721
Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen DK2100, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorReza R. Serizawa
Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorUlrik Ralfkiær
Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorKenneth Steven
Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorGitte W. Lam
Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorSven Schmiedel
Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorJoachim Schüz
Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorAlastair B. Hansen
Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorThomas Horn
Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Per Guldberg
Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
Fax: 45-3525-7721
Institute of Cancer Biology, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, Copenhagen DK2100, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this authorAbstract
The bladder cancer genome harbors numerous oncogenic mutations and aberrantly methylated gene promoters. The aim of our study was to generate a profile of these alterations and investigate their use as biomarkers in urine sediments for noninvasive detection of bladder cancer. We systematically screened FGFR3, PIK3CA, TP53, HRAS, NRAS and KRAS for mutations and quantitatively assessed the methylation status of APC, ARF, DBC1, INK4A, RARB, RASSF1A, SFRP1, SFRP2, SFRP4, SFRP5 and WIF1 in a prospective series of tumor biopsies (N = 105) and urine samples (N = 113) from 118 bladder tumor patients. We also analyzed urine samples from 33 patients with noncancerous urinary lesions. A total of 95 oncogenic mutations and 189 hypermethylation events were detected in the 105 tumor biopsies. The total panel of markers provided a sensitivity of 93%, whereas mutation and methylation markers alone provided sensitivities of 72% and 70%, respectively. In urine samples, the sensitivity was 70% for all markers, 50% for mutation markers and 52% for methylation markers. FGFR3 mutations occurred more frequently in tumors with no methylation events than in tumors with one or more methylation events (78% vs. 33%; p < 0.0001). FGFR3 mutation in combination with three methylation markers (APC, RASSF1A and SFRP2) provided a sensitivity of 90% in tumors and 62% in urine with 100% specificity. These results suggest an inverse correlation between FGFR3 mutations and hypermethylation events, which may be used to improve noninvasive, DNA-based detection of bladder cancer.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
IJC_25651_sm_suppTable-S1.doc44.5 KB | Supporting Table S1 |
IJC_25651_sm_suppTable-S2.doc98 KB | Supporting Table S2 |
IJC_25651_sm_suppTable-S3.xls113 KB | Supporting Table S3 |
IJC_25651_sm_suppTable-S4.doc86 KB | Supporting Table S4 |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1 Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55: 74–108.
- 2 Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA. World Health Organisation classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. Lyon: IARC Press, 2004.
- 3 Varkarakis MJ, Gaeta J, Moore RH, Murphy GP. Superficial bladder tumor. Aspects of clinical progression. Urology 1974; 4: 414–20.
- 4 Avritscher EB, Cooksley CD, Grossman HB, Sabichi AL, Hamblin L, Dinney CP, Elting LS. Clinical model of lifetime cost of treating bladder cancer and associated complications. Urology 2006; 68: 549–53.
- 5 Liou LS. Urothelial cancer biomarkers for detection and surveillance. Urology 2006; 67: 25–33.
- 6 Knowles MA. Molecular subtypes of bladder cancer: Jekyll and Hyde or chalk and cheese? Carcinogenesis 2006; 27: 361–73.
- 7 Stratton MR, Campbell PJ, Futreal PA. The cancer genome. Nature 2009; 458: 719–24.
- 8 Maruyama R, Toyooka S, Toyooka KO, Harada K, Virmani AK, Zochbauer-Muller S, Farinas AJ, Vakar-Lopez F, Minna JD, Sagalowsky A, Czerniak B, Gazdar AF. Aberrant promoter methylation profile of bladder cancer and its relationship to clinicopathological features. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 8659–63.
- 9 Chan MW, Chan LW, Tang NL, Tong JH, Lo KW, Lee TL, Cheung HY, Wong WS, Chan PS, Lai FM, To KF. Hypermethylation of multiple genes in tumor tissues and voided urine in urinary bladder cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8: 464–70.
- 10 Dulaimi E, Uzzo RG, Greenberg RE, Al Saleem T, Cairns P. Detection of bladder cancer in urine by a tumor suppressor gene hypermethylation panel. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 1887–93.
- 11 Hoque MO, Begum S, Topaloglu O, Chatterjee A, Rosenbaum E, Van Criekinge W, Westra WH, Schoenberg M, Zahurak M, Goodman SN, Sidransky D. Quantitation of promoter methylation of multiple genes in urine DNA and bladder cancer detection. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 996–1004.
- 12 Yates DR, Rehman I, Abbod MF, Meuth M, Cross SS, Linkens DA, Hamdy FC, Catto JW. Promoter hypermethylation identifies progression risk in bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 2046–53.
- 13 Marsit CJ, Karagas MR, Andrew A, Liu M, Danaee H, Schned AR, Nelson HH, Kelsey KT. Epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes and TP53 alteration act jointly as markers of invasive bladder cancer. Cancer Res 2005; 65: 7081–5.
- 14 Knowles MA. Molecular pathogenesis of bladder cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2008; 13: 287–97.
- 15 Malats N, Bustos A, Nascimento CM, Fernandez F, Rivas M, Puente D, Kogevinas M, Real FX. P53 as a prognostic marker for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis and review. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 678–86.
- 16 Bakkar AA, Wallerand H, Radvanyi F, Lahaye JB, Pissard S, Lecerf L, Kouyoumdjian JC, Abbou CC, Pairon JC, Jaurand MC, Thiery JP, Chopin DK, et al. FGFR3 and TP53 gene mutations define two distinct pathways in urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 8108–12.
- 17 Jebar AH, Hurst CD, Tomlinson DC, Johnston C, Taylor CF, Knowles MA. FGFR3 and Ras gene mutations are mutually exclusive genetic events in urothelial cell carcinoma. Oncogene 2005; 24: 5218–25.
- 18 Lopez-Knowles E, Hernandez S, Malats N, Kogevinas M, Lloreta J, Carrato A, Tardon A, Serra C, Real FX. PIK3CA mutations are an early genetic alteration associated with FGFR3 mutations in superficial papillary bladder tumors. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 7401–4.
- 19 Friedrich MG, Weisenberger DJ, Cheng JC, Chandrasoma S, Siegmund KD, Gonzalgo ML, Toma MI, Huland H, Yoo C, Tsai YC, Nichols PW, Bochner BH, et al. Detection of methylated apoptosis-associated genes in urine sediments of bladder cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 7457–65.
- 20 Urakami S, Shiina H, Enokida H, Kawakami T, Kawamoto K, Hirata H, Tanaka Y, Kikuno N, Nakagawa M, Igawa M, Dahiya R. Combination analysis of hypermethylated Wnt-antagonist family genes as a novel epigenetic biomarker panel for bladder cancer detection. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12: 2109–16.
- 21 Friedrich MG, Chandrasoma S, Siegmund KD, Weisenberger DJ, Cheng JC, Toma MI, Huland H, Jones PA, Liang G. Prognostic relevance of methylation markers in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2005; 41: 2769–78.
- 22 Catto JW, Azzouzi AR, Rehman I, Feeley KM, Cross SS, Amira N, Fromont G, Sibony M, Cussenot O, Meuth M, Hamdy FC. Promoter hypermethylation is associated with tumor location, stage, and subsequent progression in transitional cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2903–10.
- 23 Bergkvist A, Ljungqvist A, Moberger G. Classification of bladder tumours based on the cellular pattern. Preliminary report of a clinical-pathological study of 300 cases with a minimum follow-up of eight years. Acta Chir Scand 1965; 130: 371–8.
- 24 Sobin LH, Wittekind C. TNM classification of malignant tumours. New-York: Wiley-Liss, 6th ed. 2002.
- 25 Myers RM, Maniatis T, Lerman LS. Detection and localization of single base changes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Methods Enzymol 1987; 155: 501–27.
- 26
Guldberg P,
Nedergaard T,
Nielsen HJ,
Olsen AC,
Ahrenkiel V,
Zeuthen J.
Single-step DGGE-based mutation scanning of the p53 gene: application to genetic diagnosis of colorectal cancer.
Hum Mutat
1997;
9:
348–55.
10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1997)9:4<348::AID-HUMU8>3.0.CO;2-1 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 27 Guldberg P, Guttler F. A simple method for identification of point mutations using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Nucleic Acids Res 1993; 21: 2261–2.
- 28
Nedergaard T,
Guldberg P,
Ralfkiaer E,
Zeuthen J.
A one-step DGGE scanning method for detection of mutations in the K-, N-, and H-ras oncogenes: mutations at codons 12, 13 and 61 are rare in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Int J Cancer
1997;
71:
364–9.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970502)71:3<364::AID-IJC10>3.0.CO;2-G CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 29 Clark SJ, Harrison J, Paul CL, Frommer M. High sensitivity mapping of methylated cytosines. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22: 2990–7.
- 30 Eads CA, Danenberg KD, Kawakami K, Saltz LB, Blake C, Shibata D, Danenberg PV, Laird PW. MethyLight: a high-throughput assay to measure DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28: E32.
- 31 Weisenberger DJ, Campan M, Long TI, Kim M, Woods C, Fiala E, Ehrlich M, Laird PW. Analysis of repetitive element DNA methylation by MethyLight. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: 6823–36.
- 32 Worm J, Aggerholm A, Guldberg P. In-tube DNA methylation profiling by fluorescence melting curve analysis. Clin Chem 2001; 47: 1183–9.
- 33 Varley JM, Evans DG, Birch JM. Li-Fraumeni syndrome - a molecular and clinical review. Br J Cancer 1997; 76: 1–14.
- 34 Petitjean A, Mathe E, Kato S, Ishioka C, Tavtigian SV, Hainaut P, Olivier M. Impact of mutant p53 functional properties on TP53 mutation patterns and tumor phenotype: lessons from recent developments in the IARC TP53 database. Hum Mutat 2007; 28: 622–9.
- 35 van Rhijn BW, Lurkin I, Chopin DK, Kirkels WJ, Thiery JP, van der Kwast TH, Radvanyi F, Zwarthoff EC. Combined microsatellite and FGFR3 mutation analysis enables a highly sensitive detection of urothelial cell carcinoma in voided urine. Clin Cancer Res 2003; 9: 257–63.
- 36 Dahl C, Ralfkiaer U, Guldberg P. Methods for detection of subtle mutations in cancer genomes. Crit Rev Oncog 2006; 12: 41–74.
- 37 Berggren P, Steineck G, Adolfsson J, Hansson J, Jansson O, Larsson P, Sandstedt B, Wijkstrom H, Hemminki K. p53 mutations in urinary bladder cancer. Br J Cancer 2001; 84: 1505–11.
- 38 Knowles MA. Role of FGFR3 in urothelial cell carcinoma: biomarker and potential therapeutic target. World J Urol 2007; 25: 581–93.
- 39 Wu XR. Urothelial tumorigenesis: a tale of divergent pathways. Nat Rev Cancer 2005; 5: 713–25.
- 40 Platt FM, Hurst CD, Taylor CF, Gregory WM, Harnden P, Knowles MA. Spectrum of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway gene alterations in bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 6008–17.
- 41 Urakami S, Shiina H, Enokida H, Kawakami T, Tokizane T, Ogishima T, Tanaka Y, Li LC, Ribeiro-Filho LA, Terashima M, Kikuno N, Adachi H, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of Wnt inhibitory factor-1 plays an important role in bladder cancer through aberrant canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. Clin Cancer Res 2006; 12: 383–91.
- 42 Herman JG, Graff JR, Myohanen S, Nelkin BD, Baylin SB. Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93: 9821–6.
- 43 Yates DR, Rehman I, Meuth M, Cross SS, Hamdy FC, Catto JW. Methylational urinalysis: a prospective study of bladder cancer patients and age stratified benign controls. Oncogene 2006; 25: 1984–8.
- 44 Shen L, Ahuja N, Shen Y, Habib NA, Toyota M, Rashid A, Issa JP. DNA methylation and environmental exposures in human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 755–61.
- 45 Toyooka S, Maruyama R, Toyooka KO, McLerran D, Feng Z, Fukuyama Y, Virmani AK, Zochbauer-Muller S, Tsukuda K, Sugio K, Shimizu N, Shimizu K, et al. Smoke exposure, histologic type and geography-related differences in the methylation profiles of non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Cancer 2003; 103: 153–60.
- 46 Weisenberger DJ, Siegmund KD, Campan M, Young J, Long TI, Faasse MA, Kang GH, Widschwendter M, Weener D, Buchanan D, Koh H, Simms L, et al. CpG island methylator phenotype underlies sporadic microsatellite instability and is tightly associated with BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet 2006; 38: 787–93.
- 47 Yu J, Zhu T, Wang Z, Zhang H, Qian Z, Xu H, Gao B, Wang W, Gu L, Meng J, Wang J, Feng X, et al. A novel set of DNA methylation markers in urine sediments for sensitive/specific detection of bladder cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13: 7296–304.
- 48 Farrow GM. Urine cytology in the detection of bladder cancer: a critical approach. J Occup Med 1990; 32: 817–21.
- 49 Rothacker J, Ramsay RG, Ciznadija D, Gras E, Neylon CB, Elwood NJ, Bouchier-Hayes D, Gibbs P, Rosenthal MA, Nice EC. A novel magnetic bead-based assay with high sensitivity and selectivity for analysis of telomerase in exfoliated cells from patients with bladder and colon cancer. Electrophoresis 2007; 28: 4435–46.
- 50 Zheng S, Lin H, Liu JQ, Balic M, Datar R, Cote RJ, Tai YC. Membrane microfilter device for selective capture, electrolysis and genomic analysis of human circulating tumor cells. J Chromatogr A 2007; 1162: 154–61.