Volume 24, Issue 12 pp. 1730-1741
Special Issue Article

Assessing the impact of mixing assumptions on the estimation of streamwater mean residence time

Fabrizio Fenicia

Corresponding Author

Fabrizio Fenicia

Centre de Recherche Public—Gabriel Lippmann, Department Environment and Agro-Biotechnologies, L-4422 Belvaux, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Centre de Recherche Public—Gabriel Lippmann, Department Environment and Agro-Biotechnologies, L-4422 Belvaux, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg.===Search for more papers by this author
Sebastian Wrede

Sebastian Wrede

Centre de Recherche Public—Gabriel Lippmann, Department Environment and Agro-Biotechnologies, L-4422 Belvaux, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Water Resources Section, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, NL-2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Dmitri Kavetski

Dmitri Kavetski

Environmental Engineering, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Laurent Pfister

Laurent Pfister

Centre de Recherche Public—Gabriel Lippmann, Department Environment and Agro-Biotechnologies, L-4422 Belvaux, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Search for more papers by this author
Lucien Hoffmann

Lucien Hoffmann

Centre de Recherche Public—Gabriel Lippmann, Department Environment and Agro-Biotechnologies, L-4422 Belvaux, Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg

Search for more papers by this author
Hubert H. G. Savenije

Hubert H. G. Savenije

Water Resources Section, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5048, NL-2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey J. McDonnell

Jeffrey J. McDonnell

Institute for Water and Watersheds, Department of Forest Engineering, Resources and Management, Oregon State University, 015 Peavy Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331-5706, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 February 2010
Citations: 79

Abstract

Catchment streamwater mean residence time (Tmr) is an important descriptor of hydrological systems, reflecting their storage and flow pathway properties. Tmr is typically inferred from the composition of stable water isotopes (oxygen-18 and deuterium) in observed rainfall and discharge. Currently, lumped parameter models based on convolution and sinewave functions are usually used for tracer simulation. These traditional models are based on simplistic assumptions that are often known to be unrealistic, in particular, steady flow conditions, linearity, complete mixing and others. However, the effect of these assumptions on Tmr estimation is seldom evaluated. In this article, we build a conceptual model that overcomes several assumptions made in traditional mixing models. Using data from the experimental Maimai catchment (New Zealand), we compare a complete-mixing (CM) model, where rainfall water is assumed to mix completely and instantaneously with the total catchment storage, with a partial-mixing (PM) model, where the tracer input is divided between an ‘active’ and a ‘dead’ storage compartment. We show that the inferred distribution of Tmr is strongly dependent on the treatment of mixing processes and flow pathways. The CM model returns estimates of Tmr that are well identifiable and are in general agreement with previous studies of the Maimai catchment. On the other hand, the PM model—motivated by a priori catchment insights—provides Tmr estimates that appear exceedingly large and highly uncertain. This suggests that water isotope composition measurements in rainfall and discharge alone may be insufficient for inferring Tmr. Given our model hypothesis, we also analysed the effect of different controls on Tmr. It was found that Tmr is controlled primarily by the storage properties of the catchment, rather than by the speed of streamflow response. This provides guidance on the type of information necessary to improve Tmr estimation. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.