Volume 35, Issue 8 pp. 1144-1148
Original Article

Concurrent primary and metastatic cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of prognostic factors

Timothy McLean MBBS

Timothy McLean MBBS

Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, The Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Markus Brunner MD

Corresponding Author

Markus Brunner MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

The first 2 authors contributed equally to this work.

Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, The Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaSearch for more papers by this author
Ardalan Ebrahimi MBBS

Ardalan Ebrahimi MBBS

Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, The Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Kan Gao

Kan Gao

Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, The Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Sydney Ch'ng MBBS

Sydney Ch'ng MBBS

Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, The Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Michael J. Veness MD

Michael J. Veness MD

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan R. Clark MBBS

Jonathan R. Clark MBBS

Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, The Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Head and Neck Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 August 2012
Citations: 31

The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Background

There is a small subgroup of patients with head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) in which nodal metastases present concurrently with the primary lesion. There is evidence that these tumors may represent a more aggressive subset of cSCC. The aim of this study was to determine whether alternative clinicopathologic prognostic factors should be applied to this patient cohort.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of data from prospective databases of 2 large head and neck cancer units in Sydney, Australia, was performed. Ninety-five patients with concurrent primary and nodal metastatic head and neck cSCC were suitable for inclusion in the study.

Results

Univariable analysis was performed for overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). OS was adversely affected by immunosuppression (p = .011) and nodal extracapsular spread (ECS) (p = .006). Similarly, immunosuppression (p = .005) and ECS (p = .005) indicated a worse outcome for DSS. ECS and immunosuppression remained significant in the multivariable analysis.

Conclusions

This study found that adverse prognostic factors were similar to the current evidence for nonconcurrent metastatic cSCC. In particular, the primary lesion had no significant influence on survival. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2013

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.