The mean operation times between 2 neighboring groups were 33.9 minutes longer in group 1 than in group 2 (p = .01) and 25.8 minutes longer in group 3 than in group 4 (p = .002). The conversion rate for technical difficulties in group 1 was 6% (3 of 50). The definitive complication rate was 2% (1 of 50).

Conclusions

In terms of operative time, 10 patients represented the early stage of the learning curve, and 30 patients represented the number of procedures required to reach an advanced level of skill. Considering the low conversion and complication rates, improved aesthetic results and postoperative course, MIVAT should become a tool in the repertoire of high-volume thyroid surgeons. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2013

REFERENCES

1 Miccoli P, Berti P, Raffaelli M, Conte M, Materazzi G, Gallieri D. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Am J Surg 2001; 181: 567–570.
10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00625-0
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2 Radford PD, Ferguson MS, Magill JC, Karthikesalingham AP, Alusi G. Meta-analysis of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope 2011; 121: 1675–1681.
10.1002/lary.21864
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
3 Miccoli P, Berti P, Materazzi G, Minuto M, Barellini L. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: five years of experience. J Am Coll Surg 2004; 199: 243–248.
10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.03.025
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4 Del Rio P, Sommaruga L, Cataldo S, Robuschi G, Arcuri MF, Sianesi M. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: the learning curve. Eur Surg Res 2008; 41: 33–36.
10.1159/000127404
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5 Dionigi G, Boni L, Rovera F, Annoni M, Villa F, Dionigi R. Defining the learning curve for video-assisted thyroidectomy. Int J Surg 2008; 6 Suppl 1: S1–3.
10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.12.004
PubMed Google Scholar
6 Samy AK, Ridgway D, Orabi A, Suppiah A. Minimally invasive, video-assisted thyroidectomy: first experience from the United Kingdom. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2010; 92: 379–384.
10.1308/003588410X12628812459977
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
7 Kania RE, Parodi M, Coste A, Herman P, Tran Ba Huy P, Papon JF. Endoscopic thyroid surgery using video-assisted and totally endoscopic techniques. [Article in French] Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 2009; 126: 82–93.
10.1016/j.aorl.2009.01.006
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
8 El–Labban GM. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional thyroidectomy: a single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial. J Minim Access Surg 2009; 5: 97–102.
10.4103/0972-9941.59307
PubMed Google Scholar
9 Sahm M, Schwarz B, Schmidt S, Pross M, Lippert H. Long-term cosmetic results after minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3202–3208.
10.1007/s00464-011-1693-2
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10 Miccoli P, Rago R, Massi M, et al. Standard versus video-assisted thyroidectomy: objective postoperative pain evaluation. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2415–2417.
10.1007/s00464-010-0964-7
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11 Terris DJ, Gourin CG, Chin E. Minimally invasive thyroidectomy: basic and advanced techniques. Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 350–356.
10.1097/01.mlg.0000191462.58630.e4
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
12 Miccoli P, Bellantone R, Mourad M, Walz M, Raffaelli M, Berti P. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: multiinstitutional experience. World J Surg 2002; 26: 972–975.
10.1007/s00268-002-6627-7
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13 Del Rio P, Arcuri MF, Pisani P, De Simone B, Sianesi M. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT): what is the real advantage? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010; 395: 323–326.
10.1007/s00423-009-0589-2
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
14 Miccoli P, Berti P, Frustaci GL, Ambrosini CE, Materazzi G. Video-assisted thyroidectomy: indications and results. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2006; 391: 68–71.
10.1007/s00423-006-0027-7
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
15 Kim AJ, Liu JC, Ganly I, Kraus DH. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy 2.0: expanded indications in a tertiary care cancer center. Head Neck 2010; 33: 1557–1560.
10.1002/hed.21633
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
16 Miccoli P, Materazzi G, Berti P. Minimally invasive thyroidectomy in the treatment of well differentiated thyroid cancers: indications and limits. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 18: 114–118.
10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283378239
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
17 Neidich MJ, Steward DL. Safety and feasibility of elective minimally invasive video-assisted central neck dissection for thyroid carcinoma. Head Neck 2012; 34: 354–358.
10.1002/hed.21733
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18 Liu S, Qiu M, Jiang DZ, et al. The learning curve for endoscopic thyroidectomy: a single surgeon's experience. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1802–1806.
10.1007/s00464-009-0332-7
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
19 Lee J, Lee JH, Nah KY, Soh EY, Chung WY. Comparison of endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 1439–1446.
10.1245/s10434-010-1486-1
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume35, Issue8

August 2013

Pages 1078-1082

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: Learning curve in terms of mean operative time and conversion and complication rates

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: Learning curve in terms of mean operative time and conversion and complication rates

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information