Volume 30, Issue 10 pp. 1056-1067
Research Article

Machine learning approaches for integrating clinical and imaging features in late-life depression classification and response prediction

Meenal J. Patel

Corresponding Author

Meenal J. Patel

Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Correspondence to: M. Patel, BS, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Carmen Andreescu

Carmen Andreescu

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Julie C. Price

Julie C. Price

Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kathryn L. Edelman

Kathryn L. Edelman

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Charles F. Reynolds III

Charles F. Reynolds III

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA

Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Howard J. Aizenstein

Howard J. Aizenstein

Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 February 2015
Citations: 152

Abstract

Objective

Currently, depression diagnosis relies primarily on behavioral symptoms and signs, and treatment is guided by trial and error instead of evaluating associated underlying brain characteristics. Unlike past studies, we attempted to estimate accurate prediction models for late-life depression diagnosis and treatment response using multiple machine learning methods with inputs of multi-modal imaging and non-imaging whole brain and network-based features.

Methods

Late-life depression patients (medicated post-recruitment) (n = 33) and older non-depressed individuals (n = 35) were recruited. Their demographics and cognitive ability scores were recorded, and brain characteristics were acquired using multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging pretreatment. Linear and nonlinear learning methods were tested for estimating accurate prediction models.

Results

A learning method called alternating decision trees estimated the most accurate prediction models for late-life depression diagnosis (87.27% accuracy) and treatment response (89.47% accuracy). The diagnosis model included measures of age, Mini-mental state examination score, and structural imaging (e.g. whole brain atrophy and global white mater hyperintensity burden). The treatment response model included measures of structural and functional connectivity.

Conclusions

Combinations of multi-modal imaging and/or non-imaging measures may help better predict late-life depression diagnosis and treatment response. As a preliminary observation, we speculate that the results may also suggest that different underlying brain characteristics defined by multi-modal imaging measures—rather than region-based differences—are associated with depression versus depression recovery because to our knowledge this is the first depression study to accurately predict both using the same approach. These findings may help better understand late-life depression and identify preliminary steps toward personalized late-life depression treatment. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.