High definition cytogenetics and oligonucleotide aCGH analyses of cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cells
Mona Prasad
Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Agilent Technologies Inc. Headquarters, Santa Clara, CA
Search for more papers by this authorMarcus Bernardini
Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAnya Tsalenko
Agilent Technologies Inc. Headquarters, Santa Clara, CA
Search for more papers by this authorPaula Marrano
Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorJana Paderova
Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorChung-Hae Lee
Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAmir Ben-Dor
Agilent Technologies Inc. Headquarters, Santa Clara, CA
Search for more papers by this authorMichael T. Barrett
Agilent Technologies Inc. Headquarters, Santa Clara, CA
Pharmaceutical Genomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Scottsdale, AZ
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jeremy A. Squire
Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Room 9-721, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9Search for more papers by this authorMona Prasad
Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Agilent Technologies Inc. Headquarters, Santa Clara, CA
Search for more papers by this authorMarcus Bernardini
Division of Gynaecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAnya Tsalenko
Agilent Technologies Inc. Headquarters, Santa Clara, CA
Search for more papers by this authorPaula Marrano
Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorJana Paderova
Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorChung-Hae Lee
Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAmir Ben-Dor
Agilent Technologies Inc. Headquarters, Santa Clara, CA
Search for more papers by this authorMichael T. Barrett
Agilent Technologies Inc. Headquarters, Santa Clara, CA
Pharmaceutical Genomics Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Scottsdale, AZ
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jeremy A. Squire
Division of Applied Molecular Oncology, Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Ontario Cancer Institute, Princess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, Room 9-721, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2M9Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) is a key platform to assess cancer genomic profiles. Many structural genomic aberrations cannot be detected by aCGH alone. We have applied molecular cytogenetic analyses including spectral karyotyping, multicolor banding, and fluorescence in situ hybridization with aCGH to comprehensively investigate the genomic aberrations associated with cisplatin resistance in A2780 ovarian cancer cells. A2780 is a well-established model of chemotherapeutic resistance with distinct karyotypic abnormalities in the parental and cisplatin-resistant cells. Cytogenetic analysis revealed that two unbalanced translocations, der(8)t(1;8) and der(X)t(X;1), and loss of chromosome 13 were present only in the resistant line. Our aCGH analyses detected imbalances affecting an additional 10.59% of the genome in the cisplatin-resistant cells compared with the parental. DNA copy number changes included deletions at 1p10–p22.1, 8p23.3, and Xq13.1-pter, and a duplication of 8q11.22-q23. Cryptic genomic aberrations associated with concurrent localized changes of specific gene expression included a homozygous deletion of 0.38 Mb at 1p21.3 adjacent to SNX7, and an insertional transposition of 0.85 Mb from 13q12.12 into chromosome 22. This latter rearrangement led to an overexpression of four contiguous genes that flanked one of the breakpoint regions in chromosome 13. Furthermore, 17 genes showed differential expression correlating with genomic gain or loss between the resistant and parent lines, validated by a second expression array platform. These results highlight the integration of comprehensive profiling to determine relationships of genomic aberrations and genes associated with an in vitro drug resistance model in ovarian cancer. This article contains Supplementary Material available at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/1045-2257/suppmat. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
gcc20547-PrasadSupplementaryFigure1.tif13.5 MB | Supplementary Figure 1. A. A2780par aCGH profile for chromosome 6. (ii) A2780par SKY (inverted DAPI in the left and pseudo color on right) and (iii) XCyte 1mBAND in for the derivative chromosome der(6)t(1;6)(q24;q22) contains the 1q22 region of chromosome 1. B. A2780cis aCGH profile for chromosome 6. (ii) A2780cis SKY (inverted DAPI in the left and pseudo color on right) and (iii) XCyte 1 mBAND for the same derivative chromosome der(6)t(1;6)(q21.2;q22) as in A2780par which also contains the 1q22-pter region of chromosome 1. |
gcc20547-PrasadSupplementaryFigure2.tif15.7 MB | Supplementary Figure 2. A. (i) A2780cis SKY (inverted DAPI on left and pseudo color on right) and XCyte X mBAND of the normal chromosome X and (ii) the derivative chromosome X, der(X)t(X;1)(q13.1;q11), which is associated with loss of Xq12-q23 in A2780cis . Two copies of the Xpter-Xq12 region are represented by the purple line. B. (i) A2780cis aCGH view of chromosome X. The blue box is the zoomed in view of the Xq12 breakpoint that was localized to the androgen receptor locus (inset). However, there was no significant enrichment of differentially expressed genes in the A2780cis cells, panel B (ii). All aCGH and gene expression data plotted represent the average of dye flip experiments (materials and methods). All ADM1 settings include a threshold of 10 and a filter of 2 probes with a minimum log2ratio fold change of 0.2. High scoring intervals in A2780cis cells that pass these filters are shaded in pink and their genomic locations denoted by solid red vertical lines in the aCGH plots. C. (i) FISH validation using BAC clone RP11-51D15 which maps to the Xq26.3 region, showing two signals in A2780par cell lines on chromosome X, and (ii) one signal in the A2780cis cell line. The inverted DAPI and real color images are shown. |
gcc20547-PrasadSupplementaryTable1.doc134.5 KB | Supplementary Table 1. High Resolution Drug-Specific Copy Number Aberrations as Detected by ADM1 The table lists the bands as determined by the start and end base pair positions exported from aCGH analytics along with the number of probes present in that region. The blue arrow denotes drug-specific aberrant regions that were detected by SKY, m-BAND, and aCGH. The ADM1 score of each interval, which represents the deviation from the average log2ratios from its expected value, is indicated along with the log2ratios for that region. Where log2ratio>0.5 represents a one or greater copy gain and ratios of <-0.5 represents a one or greater copy loss. All CGH data represent the average of dye-flip experiments for each of the cell lines. |
gcc20547-PrasadSupplementaryTable2.doc149.5 KB | Supplementary Table 2. Relative Percentages of Genomic Imbalance in A2780cis in Comparison to A2780par Sum of the total genomic imbalances based on the regions detected by the ADM1 algorithm for each cell line was tabulated. Cisplatin specific genomic imbalances were calculated by subtracting A2780cis total genomic imbalance from A2780par and divided by the total human genome of 3000 Mb. |
gcc20547-PrasadSupplementaryTable3.doc82.5 KB | Supplementary Table 3. Results of Differential Expression Enrichment Analysis for A2780cis Specific Regions on Chromosomes 1, 8, and 13 Genomic regions on chromosomes 1 and 13 are enriched in genes that are down-regulated in A2780cis compared to the A2780par line; genomic region on chromosome 8 is enriched and up-regulated in the ovarian drug resistant cell line. Genes with larger than 2-fold expression change were considered differentially expressed. Enrichment p-values are calculated based on the hyper-geometric distribution. |
gcc20547-PrasadSupplementaryTable4.doc143.5 KB | Supplementary Table 4. Coordinated Genomic Change and Gene Expression Between A2780 Resistant and Parent Cell Lines using 2 Separate Expression PlatformsThese 17 genes have coordinated down or up regulation with the areas of genomic change. The values are represented as differences in the log normalized expression values using both the Affymertix and Agilent platforms. There was complete concordance for all 17 genes whereby expression differences between the resistant and parent cell lines was dependent of genomic loss or gain. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Albertson DG,Collins C,McCormick F,Gray JW. 2003. Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors. Nat Genet 34: 369–376.
- Barrett MT,Scheffer A,Ben-Dor A,Sampas N,Lipson D,Kincaid R,Tsang P,Curry B,Baird K,Meltzer PS,Yakhini Z,Bruhn L,Laderman S. 2004. Comparative genomic hybridization using oligonucleotide microarrays and total genomic DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 17765–17770.
- Behrens BC,Hamilton TC,Masuda H,Grotzinger KR,Whang-Peng J,Louie KG,Knutsen T,McKoy WM,Young RC,Ozols RF. 1987. Characterization of a cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)-resistant human ovarian cancer cell line and its use in evaluation of platinum analogues. Cancer Res 47: 414–418.
- Berchuck A,Carney M. 1997. Human ovarian cancer of the surface epithelium. Biochem Pharmacol 54: 541–544.
- Bernardini M,Lee CH,Beheshti B,Prasad M,Albert M,Marrano P,Begley H,Shaw P,Covens A,Murphy J,Rosen B,Minkin S,Squire JA,Macgregor PF. 2005. High-resolution mapping of genomic imbalance and identification of gene expression profiles associated with differential chemotherapy response in serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Neoplasia 7: 603–613.
- Cannistra SA. 2004. Cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med 351: 2519–2529.
- Forozan F,Karhu R,Kononen J,Kallioniemi A,Kallioniemi OP. 1997. Genome screening by comparative genomic hybridization. Trends Genet 13: 405–409.
- Hayes JD,Flanagan JU,Jowsey IR. 2005. Glutathione transferases. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 45: 51–88.
- Irizarry RA,Bolstad BM,Collin F,Cope LM,Hobbs B,Speed TP. 2003. Summaries of Affymetrix GeneChip probe level data. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 15.
- Iwabuchi H,Sakamoto M,Sakunaga H,Ma YY,Carcangiu ML,Pinkel D,Yang-Feng TL,Gray JW. 1995. Genetic analysis of benign, low-grade, and high-grade ovarian tumors. Cancer Res 55: 6172–6180.
- Kleinjan DJ,van Heyningen V. 1998. Position effect in human genetic disease. Hum Mol Genet 7: 1611–1618.
- Kudoh K,Takano M,Koshikawa T,Hirai M,Yoshida S,Mano Y,Yamamoto K,Ishii K,Kita T,Kikuchi Y,Nagata I,Miwa M,Uchida K. 1999. Gains of 1q21-q22 and 13q12-q14 are potential indicators for resistance to cisplatin-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 5: 2526–2531.
- Kurten RC,Cadena DL,Gill GN. 1996. Enhanced degradation of EGF receptors by a sorting nexin, SNX1. Science 272: 1008–1010.
- Leyland-Jones B,Kelland LR,Harrap KR,Hiorns LR. 1999. Genomic imbalances associated with acquired resistance to platinum analogues. Am J Pathol 155: 77–84.
- Lipson D,Aumann Y,Ben-Dor A,Linial N,Yakhini Z. 2006. Efficient calculation of interval scores for DNA copy number data analysis. J Comput Biol 13: 215–228.
- Loh SY,Mistry P,Kelland LR,Abel G,Harrap KR. 1992. Reduced drug accumulation as a major mechanism of acquired resistance to cisplatin in a human ovarian carcinoma cell line: Circumvention studies using novel platinum (II) and (IV) ammine/amine complexes. Br J Cancer 66: 1109–1115.
- Masuda H,Ozols RF,Lai GM,Fojo A,Rothenberg M,Hamilton TC. 1988. Increased DNA repair as a mechanism of acquired resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) in human ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 48: 5713–5716.
- McGuire WP,Markman M. 2003. Primary ovarian cancer chemotherapy: Current standards of care. Br J Cancer 89 ( Suppl 3): S3–S8.
- Namba R,Maglione JE,Davis RR,Baron CA,Liu S,Carmack CE,Young LJ,Borowsky AD,Cardiff RD,Gregg JP. 2006. Heterogeneity of mammary lesions represent molecular differences. BMC Cancer 6: 275.
- Perez RP. 1998. Cellular and molecular determinants of cisplatin resistance. Eur J Cancer 34: 1535–1542.
- Sasada T,Iwata S,Sato N,Kitaoka Y,Hirota K,Nakamura K,Nishiyama A,Taniguchi Y,Takabayashi A,Yodoi J. 1996. Redox control of resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II) (CDDP): Protective effect of human thioredoxin against CDDP-induced cytotoxicity. J Clin Invest 97: 2268–2276.
- Schrock E,du Manoir S,Veldman T,Schoell B,Wienberg J,Ferguson-Smith MA,Ning Y,Ledbetter DH,Bar-Am I,Soenksen D,Garini Y,Ried T. 1996. Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science 273: 494–497.
- Shaffer LG,Tommerup N. 2005. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Basel, Switzerland: Karger.
- Visakorpi T,Kallioniemi AH,Syvanen AC,Hyytinen ER,Karhu R,Tammela T,Isola JJ,Kallioniemi OP. 1995. Genetic changes in primary and recurrent prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 55: 342–347.
-
Wasenius VM,Jekunen A,Monni O,Joensuu H,Aebi S,Howell SB,Knuutila S.
1997.
Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of chromosomal changes occurring during development of acquired resistance to cisplatin in human ovarian carcinoma cells.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
18:
286–291.
10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199704)18:4<286::AID-GCC6>3.0.CO;2-X CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Willis TG,Jadayel DM,Du MQ,Peng H,Perry AR,Abdul-Rauf M,Price H,Karran L,Majekodunmi O,Wlodarska I,Pan L,Crook T,Hamoudi R,Isaacson PG,Dyer MJ. 1999. Bcl10 is involved in t(1;14)(p22;q32) of MALT B cell lymphoma and mutated in multiple tumor types. Cell 96: 35–45.
- Zhen W,Link CJ,O'Connor PM,Reed E,Parker R,Howell SB,Bohr VA. 1992. Increased gene-specific repair of cisplatin interstrand cross-links in cisplatin-resistant human ovarian cancer cell lines. Mol Cell Biol 12: 3689–3698.