Insulation failure of lightweight composite sandwich panels exposed to flame
Ehsan Negahban
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Science Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ali Bagheri
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Science Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
Correspondence
Ali Bagheri, Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Science Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAli Al-Dujaili
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Science Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorJay Sanjayan
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Science Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorEhsan Negahban
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Science Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Ali Bagheri
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Science Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
Correspondence
Ali Bagheri, Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Science Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAli Al-Dujaili
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Science Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorJay Sanjayan
Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Faculty of Science Engineering and Technology, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
A critical consideration for the serviceability of composite sandwich panels is their thermal behaviour during fire incidents. This research aims to observe the thermal performance and investigate the insulation failure of the lightweight concrete sandwich panels (LCSPs) in non-load bearing wall systems. Six standard one-sided coupling fire tests on LCSPs in accordance with Australian standard AS 1530.4 were conducted via an electrical furnace; measured by thermocouples and a thermal camera, to assess the insulation capacity and their behaviour during fire events. The results indicated that the sandwich panels have insulation capacity for 75 to 110 minutes depending on the thickness and density. The bowing of the panels due to the expansion of the exposed steel shield and the consequent de-bonding and cracking of concrete was one of the primary reasons of insulation failure. Additionally, this bowing led to the opening of the joints between the panels, which could allow the heat flows towards the unexposed surface. Moreover, the propagation of accelerated drying shrinkage cracks in the restrained concrete core was another reason for the failure. Lastly, the results suggested the benefits of increasing the thickness and density on thermal performance and insulation failure of the composite sandwich panels.
REFERENCES
- 1Hulin T et al. Experimental studies on the fire behaviour of high performance concrete thin plates. Fire Technol. 2016; 52(3): 683-705.
- 2Maluk C, Bisby L, Krajcovic M, Torero JL. A heat-transfer rate inducing system (H-TRIS) test method. Fire Saf J. 2019; 105: 307-319.
- 3Memon NA, Sumadi SR, Ramli M. Ferrocement encased lightweight aerated concrete: a novel approach to produce sandwich composite. Mater Lett. 2007; 61(19–20): 4035-4038.
- 4Chen A. Strength evaluation of honeycomb FRP sandwich panels with sinusoidal core geometry. Civil and Environmental Engineering. Morgantown, West Virginia, USA: West Virginia University; 2004.
- 5Khalaf J, Huang Z. The bond behaviour of reinforced concrete members at elevated temperatures. Fire Saf J. 2019; 103: 19-33.
- 6Narayanan N, Ramamurthy K. Structure and properties of aerated concrete: a review. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2000; 22(5): 321-329.
- 7Hamad AJ. Materials, production, properties and application of aerated lightweight concrete. International Journal of Materials Science and Engineering. 2014; 2(2): 152-157.
- 8 Comité euro-international du, b. Autoclaved Aerated Concrete: CEB Manual of Design and Technology. Vol 122. Madison, Wisconsin: Construction Press; 1978.
- 9Formosa J, Chimenos JM, Lacasta AM, Haurie L, Rosell JR. Novel fire-protecting mortars formulated with magnesium by-products. Cem Concr Res. 2011; 41(2): 191-196.
- 10Othuman MA, Wang YC. Elevated-temperature thermal properties of lightweight foamed concrete. Construct Build Mater. 2011; 25(2): 705-716.
- 11Al-Sibahy, A.F.H., Thermo-mechanical behaviour of a novel lightweight concrete and its applicationin masonry walls. 2012.
- 12Vilches J, Ramezani M, Neitzert T. Experimental investigation of the fire resistance of ultra lightweight foam concrete. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Applications. 2012; 1(4): 15-22.
- 13Khoury GA. Compressive strength of concrete at high temperatures: a reassessment. Magazine of Concrete Research. 1992; 44(161): 291-309.
- 14Rostasy FS, Weiβ R, Wiedemann G. Changes of pore structure of cement mortars due to temperature. Cem Concr Res. 1980; 10(2): 157-164.
- 15Kodur VKR, Phan L. Critical factors governing the fire performance of high strength concrete systems. Fire Saf J. 2007; 42(6–7): 482-488.
- 16Mathey RG, Rossiter WJ. A Review of Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Products. USA: US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards; 1988.
10.6028/NBS.IR.87-3670 Google Scholar
- 17Mydin MAO, Wang YC. Structural performance of lightweight steel-foamed concrete–steel composite walling system under compression. Thin-Walled Structures. 2011; 49(1): 66-76.
- 18Hörold A et al. Structural integrity of sandwich structures in fire: an intermediate-scale approach. Composite Interfaces. 2013; 20(9): 741-759.
- 19Wang YC, Foster A. Experimental and numerical study of temperature developments in PIR core sandwich panels with joint. Fire Saf J. 2017; 90: 1-14.
- 20Looyeh MRE, Rados K, Bettess P. Thermochemical responses of sandwich panels to fire. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. 2001; 37(11): 913-927.
- 21De Boer J et al. Two-way coupled CFD fire and thermomechanical FE analyses of a self-supporting sandwich panel façade system. Fire Saf J. 2019; 105: 154-168.
- 22Anjang A, Chevali VS, Kandare E, Mouritz AP, Feih S. Tension modelling and testing of sandwich composites in fire. Composite Structures. 2014; 113: 437-445.
- 23Feenstra JA, Hofmeyer H, van Herpen RAP, Mahendran M. Automated two-way coupling of CFD fire simulations to thermomechanical FE analyses at the overall structural level. Fire Saf J. 2018; 96: 165-175.
- 24Flores-Johnson EA, Li QM. Structural behaviour of composite sandwich panels with plain and fibre-reinforced foamed concrete cores and corrugated steel faces. Composite Structures. 2012; 94(5): 1555-1563.
- 25Goodrich TW, Lattimer BY. Fire decomposition effects on sandwich composite materials. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2012; 43(5): 803-813.
- 26Greepala V, Nimityongskul P. Structural integrity of ferrocement panels exposed to fire. Cement and Concrete Composites. 2008; 30(5): 419-430.
- 27Gunalan S, Mahendran M. Finite element modelling of load bearing cold-formed steel wall systems under fire conditions. Eng Struct. 2013; 56: 1007-1027.
- 28Gunalan S, Kolarkar P, Mahendran M. Experimental study of load bearing cold-formed steel wall systems under fire conditions. Thin-Walled Structures. 2013; 65: 72-92.
- 29Rizk G, Legrand V, Khalil K, Casari P, Jacquemin F. Durability of sandwich composites under extreme conditions: towards the prediction of fire resistance properties based on thermo-mechanical measurements. Composite Structures. 2018; 186: 233-245.
- 30Standards A. AS 1530.4 – Methods for fire tests on building materials, components and structures in Part 4: Fire-resistance tests for elements of construction. NSW, Australia: Standards Australia; 2014: 165.
- 31Baleshan B, Mahendran M. Experimental study of light gauge steel framing floor systems under fire conditions. Adv Struct Eng. 2017; 20(3): 426-445.
- 32Ariyanayagam AD, Mahendran M. Fire tests of non-load bearing light gauge steel frame walls lined with calcium silicate boards and gypsum plasterboards. Thin-Walled Structures. 2017; 115: 86-99.
- 33Usmani AS et al. Fundamental principles of structural behaviour under thermal effects. Fire Saf J. 2001; 36(8): 721-744.
- 34Lu L, Yuan G, Shu Q, Huang Z, Zhong C, Xu B. Bond behaviour between early age concrete and steel bar subjected to cyclic loading after fire. Fire Saf J. 2019; 105: 129-143.
- 35Villain G, Thiery M, Platret G. Measurement methods of carbonation profiles in concrete: Thermogravimetry, chemical analysis and gammadensimetry. Cem Concr Res. 2007; 37(8): 1182-1192.
- 36Novak J, Kohoutkova A. Mechanical properties of concrete composites subject to elevated temperature. Fire Saf J. 2018; 95: 66-76.
- 37Bagheri A, Nazari A, Hajimohammadi A, et al. Microstructural study of environmentally friendly boroaluminosilicate geopolymers. J Clean Prod. 2018; 189: 805-812.
