PQ decoupled 3-phase numerical observability analysis and critical data identification for distribution systems
Corresponding Author
Shouxiang Wang
Key Laboratory of Smart Grid of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
Correspondence
Shouxiang Wang, Key Laboratory of Smart Grid of Ministry of Education (Tianjin University), Tianjin 300072, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorDong Liang
Key Laboratory of Smart Grid of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
Search for more papers by this authorLeijiao Ge
Key Laboratory of Smart Grid of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
Search for more papers by this authorLei Wu
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York, 13699 USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Shouxiang Wang
Key Laboratory of Smart Grid of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
Correspondence
Shouxiang Wang, Key Laboratory of Smart Grid of Ministry of Education (Tianjin University), Tianjin 300072, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorDong Liang
Key Laboratory of Smart Grid of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
Search for more papers by this authorLeijiao Ge
Key Laboratory of Smart Grid of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072 China
Search for more papers by this authorLei Wu
Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, New York, 13699 USA
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Emerging active distribution systems are operated under more complicated and uncertain conditions. Because of frequent topology changes or temporary malfunctions of data acquisition, the network may lose observability and in turn may lead to the failure of distribution system state estimation. Without distribution system state estimation, the distribution system operator may not be able to make secure decisions, and the system may face with risk of serious damages. In this paper, a new real/reactive (PQ) decoupled 3-phase numerical observability analysis method and a new critical data identification method for distribution systems are proposed. The methods can efficiently identify all unobservable branches and critical data in a non-iterative manner. In addition to the 3-phase decoupling, the normal equation is also PQ decoupled, and the computation burden is greatly reduced. Furthermore, all entries in the Jacobian matrix are non-negative integers and the proposed methods present good numerical performance. Strict theoretical proofs on the performance of the proposed methods are provided and numerical results on different scales of test systems illustrate their validities.
REFERENCES
- 1Nick M, Cherkaoui R, Paolone M. Optimal allocation of dispersed energy storage systems in active distribution networks for energy balance and grid support. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2014; 29: 2300–2310.
- 2Chowdhury S, Chowdhury SP, Crossley P. Microgrids and Active Distribution Networks. London: The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET); 2009.
10.1049/PBRN006E Google Scholar
- 3Madani V, Das R, Aminifar F, et al. Distribution automation strategies challenges and opportunities in a changing landscape. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2015; 6: 2157–2165.
- 4Pegoraro P, Sulis S. Robustness-oriented meter placement for distribution system state estimation in presence of network parameter uncertainty. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2013; 62: 954–962.
- 5Huang YF, Werner S, Huang J, Kashyap N, Gupta V. State estimation in electric power grids: meeting new challenges presented by the requirements of the future grid. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 2012; 29: 33–43.
- 6Abur A, Exposito AG. Power System State Estimation: Theory and Implementation. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004.
10.1201/9780203913673 Google Scholar
- 7Souza JCS, Do Coutto Filho MB, Schilling MT, de Capdeville C. Optimal metering systems for monitoring power networks under multiple topological scenarios. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2005; 20: 1700–1708.
- 8Clements KA, Krumpholz GR, Davis PW. Power system state estimation with measurement deficiency: an algorithm that determines the maximal observable subnetwork. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus and Systems. 1982; 101: 3044–3052.
- 9Nucera RR, Gilles ML. Observability analysis: a new topological algorithm. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1991; 6: 466–475.
- 10Mori H, Tsuzuki S. A fast method for topological observability analysis using a minimum spanning tree technique. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1991; 6: 491–500.
- 11Monticelli A, Wu FF. Network observability: theory. IEEE Trans Power App Syst. 1985; PAS-104: 1042–1048.
- 12Gou B. Jacobian matrix-based observability analysis for state estimation. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2006; 21: 348–356.
- 13Pruneda R, Solares C, Conejo A, Castillo E. An efficient algebraic approach to observability analysis in state estimation. Electr Pow Syst Res. 2010; 80: 277–286.
- 14Korres GN. Observability analysis based on Echelon form of a reduced dimensional Jacobian matrix. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2011; 26: 2572–2573.
- 15Castillo E, Conejo AJ, Pruneda RE, Solares C. State estimation observability based on the null space of the measurement Jacobian matrix. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2005; 20: 1656–1658.
- 16Castillo E, Conejo AJ, Pruneda RE, Solares C. Observability analysis in state estimation: a unified numerical approach. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2006; 21: 877–886.
- 17Gou B, Abur A. A direct numerical method for observability analysis. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2000; 15: 625–630.
- 18de Almeida M, Asada E, Garcia A. Power system observability analysis based on gram matrix and minimum norm solution. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2008; 23: 1611–1618.
- 19Korres GN, Katsikas PJ. A hybrid method for observability analysis using a reduced network graph theory. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2003; 18: 295–304.
- 20Korres GN, Katsikas PJ, Clements KA, Davis PW. Numerical observability analysis based on network graph theory. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2003; 18: 1035–1045.
- 21Exposito AG, Abur A. Generalized observability analysis and measurement classification. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1998; 13: 1090–1095.
- 22Castillo E, Conejo AJ, Pruneda RE, Solares C, Menéndez JM. m-k Robust observability in state estimation. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems. 2008; 23: 296–305.
- 23Caro E, Arévalo I, García-Martos C, Conejo AJ. Power system observability via optimization. Electr Pow Syst Res. 2013; 104: 207–215.
- 24Korres GN, Manousakis NM. Observability analysis and restoration for systems with conventional and phasor measurements. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst. 2013; 23: 1548–1566.
- 25Korres GN, Manousakis NM. State estimation and observability analysis for phasor measurement unit measured systems. IET Gener Transm Distrib. 2012; 6: 902–913.
- 26Gol M, Abur A. Observability and criticality analyses for power systems measured by phasor measurements. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2013; 28: 3319–3326.
- 27Abiri E, Rashidi F, Niknam T. An optimal PMU placement method for power system observability under various contingencies. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst. 2015; 25: 589–606.
- 28Do Coutto Filho MB, Souza JCS, Schilling MT. Handling critical data and observability. Electr Power Compon Syst. 2007; 35: 553–573.
- 29Do Coutto Filho MB, Souza JCS, Villav-icencio Tafur JE. Quantifying observability in state estimation. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2013; 28: 2897–2906.
- 30Ayres M, Haley PH. Bad data groups in power system state estimation. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1986; 3: 1–7.
- 31Korres GN, Contaxis GC. Identification and updating of minimally dependent sets of measurements in state estimation. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 1991; 6: 999–1005.
- 32Clements KA, Krumpholz GR, Davis PW. Power system state estimation residual analysis: an algorithm using network topology. IEEE Trans Power App Syst. 1981; 100: 1779–1787.
- 33Korres GN. Observability and criticality analysis in state estimation using integer-preserving Gaussian elimination. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst. 2013; 23: 405–422.
- 34Gelagaev R, Vermeyen P, Vandewalle J, Driesen J. Numerical observability analysis of distribution systems. IEEE 14th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power (ICHQP), 2010; 1–6.
- 35Jerome J. Network observability and bad data processing algorithm for distribution networks, 2001 IEEE PES Summer Meeting, Vancouver, July, 2001; 3: 1692-1697.
- 36Toyoshima D, Castillo M, Fantin C, London J. Observability analysis and identification of critical measurements on three-phase state estimation. Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition (T&D), 2012 IEEE PES, Orlando, May, 2012; 1-7.
- 37Magnago F, Zhang L, Nagarkar R. Three phase distribution state estimation utilizing common information model. 2015 IEEE PowerTech, Eindhoven, July, 2015; 1-6.
- 38Magnago F, Zhang L, Celik M. Multiphase observability analysis in distribution systems state estimation, 19th Power Systems Computation (PSCC) Conference, Genoa, June 2016; 20–24.
- 39Gou B, Abur A. An improved measurement placement algorithm for network observability. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2001; 16: 819–824.
- 40Wang H, Schulz NN. A revised branch current-based distribution system state estimation algorithm and meter placement impact. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2004; 19: 207–213.
- 41Zhang H, Zhang B, Sun H, Wu W. Observability analysis in power system state estimation based on the solvable condition of power flow. IEEE International Conference on Power Systems Technology (POWERCON), Kunming, October, 2002, 1: 234-240.
- 42Zhang H, Zhang B, Sun H, Wu W. Observability analysis of power system state estimation based on the solvability condition of power flow. Proc. CSEE. 2003; 23: 54–58.
- 43Zhang H, Zhang B, Sun H, Wu W. Theory analysis about measurement islands' combination in observability analysis in power system state estimation. Proc. CSEE. 2003; 23: 46–49.