Volume 27, Issue 8 pp. 747-756
Research Article

Effect of surfactants and liquid hydrocarbons on gas hydrate formation rate and storage capacity

Zhigao Sun

Corresponding Author

Zhigao Sun

Department of Environment Engineering, South Campus of Jiangyang Road, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China

Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China

Department of Environmental Engineering, South Campus of Jiangyang Road, Yangzhou University, 31 Middle Jiangyang Road, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, 225009, P. R. ChinaSearch for more papers by this author
Ruzhu Wang

Ruzhu Wang

Institute of Refrigeration and Cryogenics, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200030, China

Search for more papers by this author
Rongsheng Ma

Rongsheng Ma

Department of Environment Engineering, South Campus of Jiangyang Road, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China

Search for more papers by this author
Kaihua Guo

Kaihua Guo

Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China

Search for more papers by this author
Shuanshi Fan

Shuanshi Fan

Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510070, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 April 2003
Citations: 53

Abstract

Hydrate formation rate plays an important role in making hydrates for the storage and transport of natural gas. Micellar surfactant solutions were found to increase gas hydrate formation rate and storage capacity. With the presence of surfactant, hydrate could form quickly in a quiescent system and the energy costs of hydrate formation reduced. Surfactants (an anionic surfactant, a non-ionic surfactant and their mixtures) and liquid hydrocarbons (cyclopentane and methylcyclohexane) were used to improve hydrate formation. The experiments of hydrate formation were carried out in the pressure range 3.69–6.82 MPa and the temperature range 274.05–277.55 K. The experimental pressures were kept constant during hydrate formation in each experimental run. The effect of anionic surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)) on natural gas storage in hydrates is more pronounced compared to a non-ionic surfactant (dodecyl polysaccharide glycoside (DPG)). The induction time of hydrate formation was reduced with the presence of cyclopentane (CP). Cyclopentane and methylcyclohexane (MCH) could increase hydrate formation rate, but reduced hydrate storage capacity The higher methylcyclohexane concentration, the lower the hydrate storage capacity. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.