Performance assessment of a 10 kW pressurized solid oxide fuel cell integrated with glycerol supercritical water reforming
Corresponding Author
Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot
Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand
Correspondence
Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorNarissara Chatrattanawet
Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand
Search for more papers by this authorDang Saebea
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand
Search for more papers by this authorAmornchai Arpornwichanop
Center of Excellence in Process and Energy Systems Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot
Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand
Correspondence
Yaneeporn Patcharavorachot, Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorNarissara Chatrattanawet
Department of Chemical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand
Search for more papers by this authorDang Saebea
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand
Search for more papers by this authorAmornchai Arpornwichanop
Center of Excellence in Process and Energy Systems Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: National Research Council of Thailand, Grant/Award Number: NRCT5-RSA63024-02
Summary
In this work, the integrated system of pressurized solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and supercritical water reforming of glycerol was proposed. The syngas from the reforming process has high temperature and pressure and thus, it can be used as fuel for the SOFC. The performance of an integrated system was determined through the Aspen Plus simulator in which the electrochemical equations were also included. The developed model was employed to examine the performance of the integrated system with respect to the wider ranges of operation of the reformer and SOFC. In this work, the desired power output of an SOFC stack is set as 10 kW and thus, the area of an SOFC is determined. A smaller area is required as it normally leads to a lower fabrication cost for the SOFC. The simulation results revealed that the smallest SOFC area can be provided when the reformer is operated at 800°C and 240 atm with a ratio of supercritical water to glycerol as 50 whereas the SOFC operation is at 900°C and 4 atm with the current density as 7000 A/m2. Under these operating conditions, the integrated system can provide the cell voltage, required area, fuel utilization, and SOFC efficiency as 1 V, 1.42 m2, 75% and 61%, respectively. From the exergy analysis, it was found that the compressor, heater, and turbine are the highest exergy destruction units whereas the reformer has the lowest exergy destruction, followed by the SOFC stack.
REFERENCES
- 1Al-Zareer M, Dincer I, Rosen MA. Effects of various gasification parameters and operating conditions on syngas and hydrogen production. Chem Eng Res Des. 2016; 115: 1-18.
- 2Adhikari D, Fernando SD, Haryanto A. Hydrogen production from glycerol: an update. Energ Conver Manage. 2009; 50: 2600-2604.
- 3Senseni AZ, Rezaei M, Meshkani F. Glycerol steam reforming over noble metal nanocatalysts. Chem Eng Res des. 2017; 123: 360-366.
- 4Nwosu C, Ayodele O, Ibrahim H. Optimization of hydrogen production via catalytic autothermal reforming of crude glycerol using response surface methodology and artificial neural network. Int J Energy Res. 2021; 45(13): 1-15.
- 5Patcharavorachot Y, Chery-rod N, Nudchapong S, Authayanun S, Arpornwichanop A. Hydrogen production form glycerol steam reforming in supercritical water with CO2 absorption unit. Chem Eng Trans. 2014; 39: 349-354.
- 6Reddy SN, Nanda S, Kozinski JA. Supercritical water gasification of glycerol and methanol mixtures as model waste residues from biodiesel refinery. Chem Eng Res Des. 2016; 113: 17-27.
- 7Authayanun S, Arpornwichanop A, Paengjuntuek W, Assabumrungrat S. Thermodynamic study of hydrogen production from crude glycerol autothermal reforming for fuel cell applications. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010; 35: 6617-6623.
- 8Adhikari S, Fernando S, Gwaltney S, et al. A thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production by steam reforming of glycerol. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2007; 32: 2875-2880.
- 9Rossi CCRS, Alonso CG, Antunes OAC, Guirardello R, Cardozo-Filho L. Thermodynamic analysis of steam reforming of ethanol and glycerine for hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009; 34: 323-332.
- 10Chen H, Ding Y, Cong NT, et al. A comparative study on hydrogen production from steam-glycerol reforming: thermodynamics and experimental. Renew Energy. 2011; 36: 779-788.
- 11Wang W. Thermodynamic analysis of glycerol partial oxidation for hydrogen production. Fuel Process Technol. 2010; 91: 1401-1408.
- 12Wang H, Wang X, Li M, Li S, Wang S, Ma X. Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen production from glycerol autothermal reforming. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009; 34: 5683-5690.
- 13Menezes AO, Rodrigues MT, Zimmaro S, Borges LEP, Frag MA. Production of renewable hydrogen from aqueous-phase reforming of glycerol over Pt catalysts supported on different oxides. Renew Energy. 2011; 36: 595-599.
- 14Gangadharan P, Kanchi KC, Lou HH. Evaluation of the economic and environmental impact of combining dry reforming with steam reforming of methane. Chem Eng Res Des. 2012; 90: 1956-1968.
- 15Byrd AJ, Pant KK, Gupta RB. Hydrogen production from glycerol by reforming in supercritical water over Ru/Al2O3 catalyst. Fuel. 2008; 87: 2956-2960.
- 16Bennekom JG, Venderbosch RH, Assink D, Heeres HJ. Reforming of methanol and glycerol in supercritical water. J Supercrit Fluid. 2011; 58: 99-113.
- 17Ortiz FJG, Ollero P, Serrera A, Sanz A. Thermodynamic study of the supercritical water reforming of glycerol. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2011; 36: 8994-19013.
- 18Ortiz FJG, Serrera A, Galera S, Ollero P. Experimental study of the supercritical water reforming of glycerol without the addition of a catalyst. Energy. 2013; 56: 193-206.
- 19Pairojpiriyakul T, Croiset E, Kiatkittipong K, Kiatkittipong W, Arpornwichanop A, Assabumrungrat S. Catalytic reforming of glycerol in supercritical water with nickel-based catalysts. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2014; 39: 14739-14750.
- 20Wang Y, Zhu Y, Liu Z, et al. Effect of ammonia on gasification performances of phenol in supercritical water. Chem Eng Res Des. 2018; 136: 242-250.
- 21Yang F, Hanna MA, Marx DB, Sun R. Optimization of hydrogen production from supercritical water gasification of crude glycerol-byproduct of biodiesel production. Int J Energy Res. 2012; 37(13): 1600-1609.
- 22Arpornwichanop A, Patcharavorachot Y, Assabumrungrat S. Analysis of a proton-conducting SOFC with direct internal reforming. Chem Eng Sci. 2010; 65: 581-589.
- 23Patcharavorachot Y, Arpornwichanop A, Chuachuensuk A. Electrochemical study of a planar solid oxide fuel cell: role of support structures. J Power Sources. 2008; 177: 254-261.
- 24Khalili M, Karimian Bahnamiri F, Mehrpooya M. An integrated process configuration of solid oxide fuel/electrolyzer cells (SOFC-SOEC) and solar organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for cogeneration applications. Int J Energy Res. 2021; 45(7): 11018-11040.
- 25Saebea D, Authayanun S, Patcharavorachot Y, Paengjuntuek W, Arpornwichanop A. Use of different renewable fuels in a steam reformer integrated into a solid oxide fuel cell: theoretical analysis and performance comparison. Energy. 2013; 51: 305-313.
- 26Silva AL, Mülle IL. Thermodynamic study on glycerol-fuelled intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFCs) with different electrolytes. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010; 35: 5580-5593.
- 27Silva AL, Mülle IL. Operation of solid oxide fuel cells on glycerol fuel: a thermodynamic analysis using the Gibbs free energy minimization approach. J Power Sources. 2010; 195: 5637-5644.
- 28Arpornwichanop A, Chalermpanchai N, Patcharavorachot Y, Assabumrungrat S, Tade M. Performance of an anode-supported solid oxide fuel cell with direct-internal reforming of ethanol. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009; 34: 7780-7788.
- 29Saebea D, Patcharavorachot Y, Assabumrungrat S, Arpornwichanop A. Analysis of a pressurized solid oxide fuel cell–gas turbine hybrid power system with cathode gas recirculation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2013; 38: 4748-4759.
- 30Georgis D, Jogwar SS, Almansoori AS, Daoutidis P. Design and control of energy integrated SOFC systems for in situ hydrogen production and power generation. Comput Chem Eng. 2011; 35: 1691-1704.
- 31Seidlera S, Henkea M, Kalloa J, Besslera GW, Maierb U, Friedricha KA. Pressurized solid oxide fuel cells: experimental studies and modeling. J Power Sources. 2011; 196: 7195-7202.
- 32Doherty W, Reynolds A, Kennedy D. Computer simulation of a biomass gasification-solid oxide fuel cell power system using Aspen plus. Energy. 2010; 35: 4545-4555.
- 33Wiranarongkorn K, Patcharavorachot Y, Panpranot J, Assabumrungrat S, Arpornwichanop A. Hydrogen and power generation via integrated bio-oil sorption-enhanced steam reforming and solid oxide fuel cell systems: economic feasibility analysis. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2020; 46: 11482-11493.
- 34Videau N, Fontes G, Flumian D, et al. High ratio non-isolated DC-DC converter for hydrogen battery using a 50 kW PEM fuel cell. Fuel Cells. 2016; 17(2): 187-195.
- 35Hosseini M, Dincer I, Ahmadi P, Avval HB, Ziaasharhagh M. Thermodynamic modelling of an integrated solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine system for desalination purposes. Int J Energy Res. 2011; 37(5): 426-434.
- 36Zhao F, Virkar AV. Dependence of polarization in anode-supported solid oxide fuel cells on various cell parameters. J Power Sources. 2005; 141: 79-95.
- 37Guo S, Guo L, Cao C, Yin J, Lu Y, Zhang X. Hydrogen production from glycerol by supercritical water gasification in a continuous flow tubular reactor. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2012; 37: 5559-5568.
- 38Markočič E, Kramberger B, van Bennekom JG, Jan Heeres H, Vos J, Knez Ž. Glycerol reforming in supercritical water; a short review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013; 23: 40-48.