A game theoretic analysis of a closed-loop water-energy nexus: The effect of technology efficiency and market competition on the market equilibrium and social welfare
Corresponding Author
Nabeel Hamoud
Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Correspondence
Nabeel Hamoud, Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJaejin Jang
Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Nabeel Hamoud
Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Correspondence
Nabeel Hamoud, Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJaejin Jang
Department of Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Water and energy are two scarce and concerning resources interconnected in the closed-loop water-energy nexus, exemplifying the co-dependence of water and energy production. In this article, we investigate the interaction between the industries of these two resources and model it as a simultaneous game. We consider a supply chain that consists of water suppliers (WSs), power suppliers (PSs), and consumers of these commodities. In the supply chain, WSs purchase power from the power market, and PSs purchase water from the water market. Other consumers can also buy these resources at the water and power markets. The prices of these commodities depend on their quantities supplied to the markets. Each firm tries to maximize its own profit, in doing so the suppliers of water and power decide their production quantities. In this research, the Nash equilibria of the firms are determined and a comparative statics is performed on various economic measures. When there are multiple equilibria, the analysis finds the Pareto optimal equilibrium. We find that when there is sufficient supply to meet the demand of both industries and consumers, improvement of production technology improves social welfare and other economic measures of the supply chain. We also find that higher competition in either industry improves all economic measures. However, when either water or power supply is solely consumed by the firms in the cross industry, improvement of technology and higher competition can have a negative effect on some measures.
REFERENCES
- 1 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050 technical report. OECD Publishing; 2012.
- 2International Energy Agency (IEA). Water for energy. World Energy Outlook 2012; 2012.
- 3 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report. In: Core Writing Team, RK Pachauri, LA Meyer, eds. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Technical Report. Geneva, Switzerland; 2014.
- 4Dieter CA, Maupin M, Caldwell. Estimated Use of Water in the United States in 2015. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey; 2018; 35p. https://doi.org/10.3133/cir1441.
- 5 U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). Energy-Water Nexus: Improvements to Federal Water Use Data Would Increase Understanding of Trends in Power Plant Water Use. Technical Report; 2009.
- 6Gjorgiev B, Sansavini G. Electrical power generation under policy constrained water-energy nexus. Appl Energy. 2018; 210: 568-579.
- 7Murrant D, Quinn A, Chapman L. The water-energy nexus: Future water resource availability and its implications on UK thermal power generation. Water Environ J. 2015; 29(3): 307-319.
- 8Stillwell AS. Sustainability of Public Policy: Example from the Energy–Water Nexus. J Water Resour Plan Manag. 2015; 141(12): A4015001. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29WR.1943-5452.0000522
- 9Pan SY, Snyder SW, Packman AI, Lin YJ, Chiang PC. Cooling water use in thermoelectric power generation and its associated challenges for addressing water-energy nexus. Water-Energy Nexus. 2018; 1(1): 26-41.
10.1016/j.wen.2018.04.002 Google Scholar
- 10Duan C, Chen B. Driving factors of water-energy nexus in China. Appl Energy. 2020; 257:113984.
- 11Ackerman F, Fisher J. Is there a water-energy nexus in electricity generation? Long-term scenarios for the western United States. Energy Policy. 2013; 59: 235-241.
- 12DeNooyer TA, Peschel JM, Zhang Z, Stillwell AS. Integrating water resources and power generation: The energy–water nexus in Illinois. Appl Energy. 2016; 162: 363-371.
- 13Liu L, Hejazi M, Patel P, et al. Water demands for electricity generation in the U.S.: Modeling different scenarios for the water-energy nexus. Technol Forecast Social Change. 2015; 94: 318-334.
- 14Nogueira Vilanova MR, Perrella Balestieri JA. Exploring the water-energy nexus in Brazil: The electricity use forwater supply. Energy. 2015; 85: 415-432.
- 15Schoonbaert B. The water-energy nexus in the UK: Assessing the impact of UK energy policy on future water use in thermoelectric power generation [PhD thesis]. Kings College, University of London; 2012.
- 16 The Great Lakes Commission. Integrating energy and water resources decision making in the Great Lakes Basin: an examination of future power generation scenarios and water resource impacts. Technical Report; 2011.
- 17Mounir A, Mascaro G, White DD. A metropolitan scale analysis of the impacts of future electricity mix alternatives on the water-energy nexus. Appl Energy. 2019; 256:113870.
- 18Khalkhali M, Westphal K, Mo W. The water-energy nexus at water supply and its implications on the integrated water and energy management. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 636: 1257-1267.
- 19Mohammed Ali SW, Vahedi N, Romero C, Banerjee A. Water usage and energy penalty of different hybrid cooling system configurations for a natural gas combined cycle power plant–Effect of carbon capture unit integration. Int J Energy Res. 2019; 43(11): 5879-5896.
- 20Chang Y, Li G, Yao Y, Zhang L, Yu C. Quantifying the water-energy-food nexus: Current status and trends. Energies. 2016; 9(2): 1-17.
- 21Feng K, Hubacek K, Siu YL, Li X. The energy and water nexus in Chinese electricity production: A hybrid life cycle analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014; 39: 342-355.
- 22Li X, Feng K, Siu YL, Hubacek K. Energy-water nexus of wind power in China: The balancing act between CO2 emissions and water consumption. Energy Policy. 2012; 45: 440-448.
- 23Yang J, Chen B. Energy-water nexus of wind power generation systems. Appl Energy. 2016; 169: 1-13.
- 24Xie X, Jia B, Han G, Wu S, Dai J, Weinberg J. A historical data analysis of water-energy nexus in the past 30 years urbanization of Wuxi city, China. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2018; 37(1): 46-55.
- 25Barker ZA, Stillwell AS. Implications of transitioning from de Facto to engineered water reuse for power plant cooling. Environ Sci Technol. 2016; 50(10): 5379-5388.
- 26Clayton ME, Stillwell AS, Webber ME. Implementation of brackish groundwater desalination using wind-generated electricity: a case study of the energy-water nexus in Texas. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2014; 6(2): 758-778.
- 27Sovacool BK, Sovacool KE. Identifying future electricity–water tradeoffs in the United States. Energy Policy. 2009; 37: 2763-2773.
- 28Wong KV, Johnston J. Cooling systems for power plants in an energy-water nexus era. J Energy Resour Technol. 2013; 136(1):012001.
- 29Gabriel KJ, El-Halwagi MM, Linke P. Optimization across the water-energy nexus for integrating heat, power, and water for industrial processes, coupled with hybrid thermal-membrane desalination. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2016; 55(12): 3442-3466.
- 30Gold G, Webber M. The Energy-Water Nexus: an analysis and comparison of various configurations integrating desalination with renewable power. Resources. 2015; 4(2): 227-276.
10.3390/resources4020227 Google Scholar
- 31Martín M, Grossmann IE. Water-energy nexus in biofuels production and renewable based power. Sustain Prod Consumption. 2015; 2: 96-108.
- 32Santhosh A, Farid AM, Youcef-Toumi K. The impact of storage facility capacity and ramping capabilities on the supply side economic dispatch of the energy-water nexus. Energy. 2014; 66: 363-377.
- 33Stillwell AS, Webber ME. Geographic, technologic, and economic analysis of using reclaimed water for thermoelectric power plant cooling. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48(8): 4588-4595.
- 34Zhang X, Vesselinov VV. Energy-water nexus: balancing the tradeoffs between two-level decision makers. Appl Energy. 2016; 183: 77-87.
- 35Zhang Y, Fang J, Wang S, Yao H. Energy-water nexus in electricity trade network: a case study of interprovincial electricity trade in China. Appl Energy. 2020; 257:113685.
- 36Lv J, Li YP, Shan BG, Jin SW, Suo C. Planning energy-water nexus system under multiple uncertainties – a case study of Hebei province. Appl Energy. 2018; 229: 389-403.
- 37Tsolas SD, Karim MN, Hasan MM. Optimization of water-energy nexus: a network representation-based graphical approach. Appl Energy. 2018; 224: 230-250.
- 38Bhaduri A, Liebe J. Cooperation in transboundary water sharing with issue linkage: game-theoretical case study in the Volta Basin. J Water Resour Plan Manag. 2013; 139(3): 235-245.
- 39He L, Chen Y, Zhao H, Tian P, Xue Y, Chen L. Game-based analysis of energy-water nexus for identifying environmental impacts during Shale gas operations under stochastic input. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 627: 1585-1601.
- 40Madani K. Game theory and water resources. J Hydrol. 2010; 381(3–4): 225-238.
- 41Madani K. Hydropower licensing and climate change: insights from cooperative game theory. Adv Water Resour. 2011; 34(2): 174-183.
- 42Nanduri V, Otieno W. A new water and carbon conscious electricity market model for the electricity-water-climate change nexus. Electr J. 2011; 24(9): 64-74.
10.1016/j.tej.2011.09.021 Google Scholar
- 43Nanduri V, Saavedra-Antolínez I. A competitive Markov decision process model for the energy–water–climate change nexus. Appl Energy. 2013; 111: 186-198.
- 44Harto CB, Finster M, Schroeder J, Clark C. Saline water for power plant cooling: challenges and opportunities. Technical Report. Argonne National Laboratory; 2014.
- 45Macknick J, Newmark R, Heath G, Hallett K. Operational water consumption and withdrawal factors for electricity generating technologies: a review of existing literature. Environ Res Lett. 2012; 7(4):045802.
- 46 U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA). Today in Energy. 2011. https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=790. Accessed June 10, 2020.
- 47Pulido-Velazquez M, Alvarez-Mendiola E, Andreu J. Design of efficient water pricing policies integrating basinwide resource opportunity costs. J Water Resour Plan Manag. 2012; 139(5): 583-592.
- 48Craig RK. Adapting water federalism to climate change impacts: energy policy, food security, and the allocation of water resources. Environ Energy Law Policy J. 2010; 5: 183-236.
- 49 Murray–Darling Basin Authority. Water markets in the Murray – Darling Basin. Technical Report. Australian Government; 2015.
- 50Dreves A, Facchine F, Kanzow C, Sagratella S. On the solution of the KKT conditions of generalized Nash equilibrium problems. SIAM J Optim. 2011; 21(3): 1082-1108.
- 51Church J, Ware R. Industrial Organization: A Strategic Approach; 12. New York City, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
- 52LaValle SM. Planning Algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
10.1017/CBO9780511546877 Google Scholar