Optimal integration of a biomass-based polygeneration system in an iron production plant for negative carbon emissions
Aristotle T. Ubando
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
Mechanical Engineering Department, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Wei-Hsin Chen
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
Research Center for Energy Technology and Strategy, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
Correspondence
Wei-Hsin Chen, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorRaymond R. Tan
Chemical Engineering Department, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Search for more papers by this authorSalman Raza Naqvi
School of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
Search for more papers by this authorAristotle T. Ubando
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
Mechanical Engineering Department, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Wei-Hsin Chen
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
Research Center for Energy Technology and Strategy, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
Correspondence
Wei-Hsin Chen, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorRaymond R. Tan
Chemical Engineering Department, De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines
Search for more papers by this authorSalman Raza Naqvi
School of Chemical and Materials Engineering, National University of Sciences and Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: Ministry of Science and Technology, Grant/Award Numbers: MOST 108-3116-F-006-007-CC1, MOST 107-2811-E-006-529, MOST 106-2923-E-006-002-MY3
Summary
The iron industry is an energy-intensive sector and a major contributor to global carbon dioxide emissions. With the projected increase in the demand for iron as raw material, the industry seeks ways to improve sustainability. The incorporation of a biomass-based polygeneration system (BBPS) is a sustainable approach to generate the needed utilities of the iron plant. Biomass can be converted thermochemically into fuel gas for use in the plant, while the resulting biochar can be utilized for carbon sequestration. A multiobjective optimization model using fuzzy linear programming (FLP) is developed to seamlessly integrate a BBPS in an iron plant while obtaining negative carbon emissions. The FLP model simultaneously satisfied the product demands while maximizing the annual profit and minimizing the carbon footprint of the iron manufacturing plant. A sensitivity study is performed to gauge the effects of uncertainties of the prices of product streams and capital costs together. The best configuration of the integrated BBPS and the iron production plant are determined using this approach, resulting in 2.7 million tons CO2 y−1 of negative carbon emission. The reduction of the carbon footprint upper threshold target by 80% has shown a 34.15% improvement on the negative carbon footprint and 1.81% enhancement on the annualized capital cost of the plant. The change in the biomass price had a significant effect on the Pareto frontier of the level of satisfaction compared with the change in the coal and iron ore prices. The varied capital cost of the gasification had a relatively significant influence to the annualized profit of the plant compared with the varied capital cost of the other polygeneration processes.
REFERENCES
- 1Gonzalez IH, Kamiński J. The iron and steel industry: a global market perspective. Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi - Mineral Resources Management. 2011; 27: 5-28.
- 2Mirmoshtaghi G, Skvaril J, Campana PE, Li H, Thorin E, Dahlquist E. The influence of different parameters on biomass gasification in circulating fluidized bed gasifiers. Energy Conversion and Management. 2016; 126: 110-123.
- 3Mousa E, Wang C, Riesbeck J, Larsson M. Biomass applications in iron and steel industry: an overview of challenges and opportunities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016; 65: 1247-1266.
- 4Karali N, Xu T, Sathaye J. Reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions by energy efficiency measures and international trading: a bottom-up modeling for the U.S. iron and steel sector. Applied Energy. 2014; 120: 133-146.
- 5Loh SK. The potential of the Malaysian oil palm biomass as a renewable energy source. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017; 141: 285-298.
- 6Gutiérrez AS, Eras JJ, Huisingh D, Vandecasteele C, Hens L. The current potential of low-carbon economy and biomass-based electricity in Cuba. The case of sugarcane, energy cane and marabu (Dichrostachys cinerea) as biomass sources. Journal of cleaner production. 2018; 172: 2108-2122.
- 7Ubando AT, Chen WH, Ashokkumar V, Chang JS. Iron oxide reduction by torrefied microalgae for CO2 capture and abatement in chemical-looping combustion. Energy. 2019; 186:115903.
- 8Ubando AT, Chen WH, Ong HC. Iron oxide reduction by graphite and torrefied biomass analyzed by TG-FTIR for mitigating CO2 emissions. Energy. 2019; 180: 968-977.
- 9Suopajärvi H, Umeki K, Mousa E, et al. Use of biomass in integrated steelmaking—status quo, future needs and comparison to other low-CO 2 steel production technologies. Applied Energy. 2018; 213: 384-407.
- 10Adams TA, Ghouse JH. Polygeneration of fuels and chemicals. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering. 2015; 10: 87-93.
- 11Serra LM, Lozano MA, Ramos J, Ensinas AV, Nebra SA. Polygeneration and efficient use of natural resources. Energy. 2009; 34(5): 575-586.
- 12Jana K, Ray A, Majoumerd MM, Assadi M, de S. Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution—a comprehensive review. Applied Energy. 2017; 202: 88-111.
- 13Bin C, Hongguang J, Lin G. System study on natural gas-based polygeneration system of DME and electricity. International Journal of Energy Research. 2008; 32(8): 722-734.
- 14Ren J. Selection of sustainable prime mover for combined cooling, heat, and power technologies under uncertainties: an interval multicriteria decision-making approach. International Journal of Energy Research. 2018; 42(8): 2655-2669.
- 15Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature. 2009; 461(7263): 472-475.
- 16Haszeldine RS, Flude S, Johnson G, Scott V. Negative emissions technologies and carbon capture and storage to achieve the Paris Agreement commitments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 2018; 376(2119):20160447.
- 17Smith P. Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies. Global Change Biology. 2016; 22(3): 1315-1324.
- 18Du S-W, Yeh CP, Chen WH, Tsai CH, Lucas JA. Burning characteristics of pulverized coal within blast furnace raceway at various injection operations and ways of oxygen enrichment. Fuel. 2015; 143: 98-106.
- 19Bach QV, Chen WH, Chu YS, Skreiberg Ø. Predictions of biochar yield and elemental composition during torrefaction of forest residues. Bioresource Technology. 2016; 215: 239-246.
- 20Chen WH, Huang MY, Chang JS, Chen CY. Torrefaction operation and optimization of microalga residue for energy densification and utilization. Applied Energy. 2015; 154: 622-630.
- 21Roy P, Dias G. Prospects for pyrolysis technologies in the bioenergy sector: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017; 77: 59-69.
- 22Spokas K, Novak JM, Stewart CE, et al. Qualitative analysis of volatile organic compounds on biochar. Chemosphere. 2011; 85(5): 869-882.
- 23McGlashan N, Shah N, Caldecott B, Workman M. High-level techno-economic assessment of negative emissions technologies. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2012; 90(6): 501-510.
- 24Galinato SP, Yoder JK, Granatstein D. The economic value of biochar in crop production and carbon sequestration. Energy Policy. 2011; 39(10): 6344-6350.
- 25Tan RR. Data challenges in optimizing biochar-based carbon sequestration. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2019; 104: 174-177.
- 26Ubando AT, Culaba AB, Aviso KB, Ng DKS, Tan RR. Fuzzy mixed-integer linear programming model for optimizing a multi-functional bioenergy system with biochar production for negative carbon emissions. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 2014; 16(8): 1537-1549.
- 27Belmonte BA, Benjamin MFD, Tan RR. Optimization-based decision support methodology for the synthesis of negative-emissions biochar systems. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2019; 19: 105-116.
- 28Ghanbari H, Helle M, Pettersson F, Saxén H. Optimization study of steelmaking under novel blast furnace operation combined with methanol production. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2011; 50(21): 12103-12112.
- 29Ghanbari H, Helle M. Steelmaking integrated with a polygeneration plant for improved sustainability. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2012; 29: 1033-1038.
- 30Ghanbari H, Saxén H, Grossmann IE. Optimal design and operation of a steel plant integrated with a polygeneration system. AIChE Journal. 2013; 59(10): 3659-3670.
- 31Ghanbari H, Helle M, Saxén H. Optimization of an integrated steel plant with carbon capturing and utilization processes. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2015; 28: 12-17.
10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.10.069 Google Scholar
- 32Bellman RE, Zadeh LA. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science. 1970; 17: B-141-B-164.
- 33Zimmermann HJ. Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 1978; 1(1): 45-55.
10.1016/0165-0114(78)90031-3 Google Scholar
- 34Ubando AT, Chen WH. Multi-objective design of a biomass-based polygeneration for iron and steel manufacturing. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2019; 268: 012085-012085.
10.1088/1755-1315/268/1/012085 Google Scholar
- 35Javadian N, Maali Y, Mahdavi-Amiri N. Fuzzy linear programming with grades of satisfaction in constraints. Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 2009; 6: 17-35.
- 36Nogami H, Yagi JI, Kitamura SY, Austin PR. Analysis on material and energy balances of ironmaking systems on blast furnace operations with metallic charging, top gas recycling and natural gas injection. ISIJ International. 2006; 46(12): 1759-1766.
- 37Kostúr K, Kačur J. Indirect measurement of syngas calorific value. Proceedings of the 2015 16th International Carpathian Control Conference, ICCC 20152015: 229-234.
- 38You S, Ok YS, Tsang DCW, Kwon EE, Wang CH. Towards practical application of gasification: a critical review from syngas and biochar perspectives. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 2018; 48(22-24): 1165-1213.
- 39Stelte W. Energy & climate centre for renewable energy and transport section for biomass torrefaction of unutilized biomass resources and characterization of torrefaction gasses. Danish Technological Institute. 2012; 1-12.
- 40Ubando AT, Culaba AB, Aviso KB, et al. Fuzzy mixed integer non-linear programming model for the design of an algae-basedeco-industrial park with prospective selection of support tenants under product price variability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016; 136: 183-196.
- 41Sy CL, Aviso KB, Ubando AT, Tan RR. Target-oriented robust optimization of polygeneration systems under uncertainty. Energy. 2016; 116: 1334-1347.
- 42Ubando AT, Rivera DRT, Chen WH, Culaba AB. A comprehensive review of life cycle assessment (LCA) of microalgal and lignocellulosic bioenergy products from thermochemical processes. Bioresource Technology. 2019; 291: 121837-121837.
- 43Lisienko VG, Chesnokov YN, Lapteva AV, Noskov VY. Types of greenhouse gas emissions in the production of cast iron and steel. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2016; 150: 012023.
10.1088/1757-899X/150/1/012023 Google Scholar
- 44 International Renewable Energy Agency. Renewable power generation costs in 2017. 2018. Available at: https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2018/Jan/IRENA_2017_Power_Costs_2018.pdf.
- 45Henrich E et al. The international logistics of wood pellets for heating and power production in Europe. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 2010; 132-153.
- 46Tiffany DG, Lee WF, Morey V, Kaliyan N. Economic analysis of biomass torrefaction plants integrated with corn ethanol plants and coal-fired power plants. Advances in Energy Research. 2015; 1: 127-146.
10.12989/eri.2013.1.2.127 Google Scholar
- 47Larsson M, Grip CE, Ohlsson H, Rutqvist S, Wikström JO, Ångström S. Comprehensive study regarding greenhouse gas emission from iron ore based production at the integrated steel plant SSAB Tunnplåt AB. International Journal of Green Energy. 2006; 3(2): 171-183.
- 48Budzianowski WM. Negative carbon intensity of renewable energy technologies involving biomass or carbon dioxide as inputs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012; 16(9): 6507-6521.
- 49Bridgwater AV. Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2003; 91(2-3): 87-102.