Volume 49, Issue 7 pp. 1401-1420
RESEARCH ARTICLE

What is threatening about refugees? Identifying different types of threat and their association with emotional responses and attitudes towards refugee migration

Helen Landmann

Corresponding Author

Helen Landmann

Department of Psychology, Community Psychology, FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany

Correspondence

Helen Landmann, Department of Psychology, Community Psychology, FernUniversität in Hagen, 58084 Hagen, Germany.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Robert Gaschler

Robert Gaschler

Department of Psychology, Experimental Psychology—Learning, Motivation, Emotion, FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Anette Rohmann

Anette Rohmann

Department of Psychology, Community Psychology, FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 April 2019
Citations: 89

Abstract

Threat is one of the most important predictors for attitudes towards refugees and migration. The current research addresses the role of different threat types and emotional reactions in the context of refugee migration with a multi-method approach. Using qualitative (Study 1, = 202) and quantitative (Studies 2–4, = 873) methods, we identified six types of threat that majority group members in Germany experience in the face of refugee migration: Concerns about cultural differences (symbolic threat), financial strain (realistic threat), criminal acts (safety threat), conflicts within society (cohesion threat), increasing xenophobia (prejudice threat), and refugee care (altruistic threat). All these threat types elicited negative emotions and were associated with negative attitudes towards refugees and support for restrictive migration policies. Paradoxically, concerns about refugee care predicted support for restrictive migration policies particularly well (altruistic threat paradox), which can be explained by a lack of emotional responses to this type of threat. Based on these findings, we propose a bidirectional model of intergroup threat.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

There are no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.