Biases in self-evaluation: moderating effects of attribute controllability
Corresponding Author
Klaus Rothermund
University of Trier, Germany
University of Trier, Department of Psychology, D-54286, Trier, Germany.Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Klaus Rothermund
University of Trier, Germany
University of Trier, Department of Psychology, D-54286, Trier, Germany.Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This study investigated moderating effects of attribute controllability on self-evaluation biases. Students of psychology rated the degree to which they possessed attributes that were described as having either positive or negative implications for academic success. For attributes that were perceived as trait-like or stable, self-ratings were higher when the attributes were presented as positive predictors of achievement than when the same attributes were presented as risk factors, indicating a self-enhancement bias. An opposite tendency emerged for attributes that were perceived as open to personal control: Here, self-ratings were higher for attributes that were presented as risk factors, indicating an enhanced tendency for self-critique and self-correction. This asymmetry of effects is explained in terms of a dual-process model of action regulation (Brandtstädter & Rothermund, 2002a, 2002b). Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621–1630.
- Alicke, M. D. (1999). Self-orientations in self and social judgment. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 35–39.
- Aspinwall, L. G., & Brunhart, S. M. (1996). Distinguishing optimism from denial: Optimistic beliefs predict attention to health threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 993–1003.
- Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator/mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
- Baumeister, R. F., & Newman, L. S. (1994). How stories make sense of personal experiences: Motives that shape autobiographical narratives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 676–690.
- Brandtstädter, J., & Rothermund, K. (2002a). Intentional self-development: Exploring the interfaces between development, intentionality, and the self. In L. J. Crockett (Ed.), Agency, motivation, and the life course (Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 48, pp. 31–75). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
- Brandtstädter, J., & Rothermund, K. (2000b). The life-course dynamics of goal pursuit and goal adjustment: A two-process framework. Developmental Review, 22, 117–150.
- Brandtstädter, J., Wentura, D., & Rothermund, K. (1999). Intentional self-development through adulthood and later life: Tenacious pursuit and flexible adjustment of goals. In J. Brandtstädter, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Action and self-development: Theory and research through the life span (pp. 373–400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.4135/9781452204802.n13 Google Scholar
- Brandtstädter, J., Voss, A., & Rothermund, K. (2004). Perception of danger signals: The role of control. Experimental Psychology, 51, 24–32.
- Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353–376.
- Costa, P. T. Jr., Herbst, J. H., McCrae, R. R., & Siegler, I. C. (2000). Personality at midlife: Stability, intrinsic maturation, and response to life events. Assessment, 7, 365–378.
- Cross, P. (1977). Not can but will college teaching be improved? New Directions for Higher Education, 17, 1–15.
10.1002/he.36919771703 Google Scholar
- Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568–584.
- Dunning, D. (1995). Trait importance and modifiability as factors influencing self-assessment and self-enhancement motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1297–1306.
- Dunning, D. (1999). A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 1–11.
- Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082–1090.
- Duval, T. S., & Silvia, P. J. (2002). Self-awareness, probability of improvement, and the self-serving bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 49–61.
- Fazio, R. H., Effrein, E. A., & Falender, V. J. (1981). Self-perceptions following social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 232–242.
- Gilbert, D. T., & Ebert, J. E. (2002). Decisions and revisions: The affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 503–514.
- Klein, W. M., & Kunda, Z. (1993). Maintaining self-serving social comparisons: Biased reconstruction of one's past behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 732–739.
- Klein, W. M., & Kunda, Z. (1994). Exaggerated self-assessments and the preference for controllable risks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 410–427.
- Krueger, J. (1998). Enhancement bias in descriptions of self and others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 505–516.
- Kuhl, J., & Helle, P. (1986). Motivational and volitional determinants of depression: The degenerated-intention hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 247–251.
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498.
- Kunda, Z., & Sanitioso, R. (1989). Motivated changes in the self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 272–285.
- Martin, L. L., & Tesser, A. (1989). Toward a motivational and structural theory of ruminative thought. In J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 306–326). New York: Guilford.
- McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., Terracciano, A., Parker, W. D., Mills, C. J., De Fruyt, F., & Mervielde, I. (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and cross-cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1456–1468.
- Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1998). Ruminative coping with depression. In J. Heckhausen, & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulation across the life-span (pp. 237–256). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511527869.011 Google Scholar
- Rothermund, K., & Meiniger, C. (2004). Stress-buffering effects of self-complexity: Reduced affective spillover or self-regulatory processes? Self and Identity, 3, 263–281.
- Rothermund, K., Brandtstädter, J., Meiniger, C., & Anton, F. (2002). Nociceptive sensitivity and control: Hypo- and hyperalgesia under two different modes of coping. Experimental Psychology, 49, 57–66.
- Sedikides, C. (1999). A multiplicity of motives: The case of self-improvement. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 64–65.
- Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 209–269). New York: Academic Press.
- Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.
- Taylor, S. E., Neter, E., & Wayment, H. A. (1995). Self-evaluation processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1278–1287.
- Ward, A., Lyubomirsky, S., Sousa, L., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003). Can't quite commit: Rumination and uncertainty. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 96–107.
- Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806–820.
- Weinstein, N. D. (1984). Why it won't happen to me: Perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility. Health Psychology, 3, 431–457.