Volume 35, Issue 2 pp. 281-290
Short Communication

Biases in self-evaluation: moderating effects of attribute controllability

Klaus Rothermund

Corresponding Author

Klaus Rothermund

University of Trier, Germany

University of Trier, Department of Psychology, D-54286, Trier, Germany.Search for more papers by this author
Peter M. Bak

Peter M. Bak

University of Trier, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Jochen Brandtstädter

Jochen Brandtstädter

University of Trier, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 March 2005
Citations: 17

Abstract

This study investigated moderating effects of attribute controllability on self-evaluation biases. Students of psychology rated the degree to which they possessed attributes that were described as having either positive or negative implications for academic success. For attributes that were perceived as trait-like or stable, self-ratings were higher when the attributes were presented as positive predictors of achievement than when the same attributes were presented as risk factors, indicating a self-enhancement bias. An opposite tendency emerged for attributes that were perceived as open to personal control: Here, self-ratings were higher for attributes that were presented as risk factors, indicating an enhanced tendency for self-critique and self-correction. This asymmetry of effects is explained in terms of a dual-process model of action regulation (Brandtstädter & Rothermund, 2002a, 2002b). Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.