Research article
Sexual objectification pushes women away: The role of decreased likability
Fei Teng,
Zhansheng Chen, Kai-Tak Poon, Denghao Zhang,
Corresponding Author
Fei Teng
South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
Correspondence to: Fei Teng, School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Denghao Zhang, Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Denghao Zhang
Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
Correspondence to: Fei Teng, School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Denghao Zhang, Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFei Teng,
Zhansheng Chen, Kai-Tak Poon, Denghao Zhang,
Corresponding Author
Fei Teng
South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China
Correspondence to: Fei Teng, School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Denghao Zhang, Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Denghao Zhang
Renmin University of China, Beijing, China
Correspondence to: Fei Teng, School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Denghao Zhang, Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The present investigation examined the effect of sexual objectification on women's intention to affiliate with men. We predicted that women would perceive an objectifier as less likable following sexual objectification and thus would distance themselves from the perpetrator. Study 1 found that objectification led female participants to perceive their male partner as less likable and to be less willing to affiliate with the partner. Study 2 replicated Study 1 in a concurrent interpersonal interaction and extended these effects to a man having a similar background with the perpetrator. Study 3 showed that power moderated the effect of sexual objectification on women's interaction intention such that only women with equal or low power (as compared to the objectifier) decreased their affiliation intention toward the objectifier, whereas high-power women did not show this effect. Implications of these findings were discussed. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Anderson, C., & Berdahl, J. L. (2002). The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1362–1377.
- Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536.
- Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression. New York: Routledge.
- Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529.
- Bloom, B. L., White, S. W., & Asher, S. J. (1979). Marital disruption as a stressful life event. In G. Levinger, & O. C. Moles (Eds.), Divorce and separation: Context, causes and consequences (pp. 184–200). New York: Basic Books.
- Bodenhausen, G. V., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., & Wänke, M. (1995). Effects of atypical exemplars on racial beliefs: Enlightened racism or generalized appraisals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 48–63.
- Breines, J., Crocker, J., & Garcia, J. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being in women's daily lives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 583–598.
- Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull, & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in Social Cognition (Vol 1, pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
- Calogero, R. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21.
- Calogero, R., Herbozo, S., & Thompson, J. (2009). Complimentary weightism: The potential costs of appearance-related commentary for women's self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 120–132.
- Chen, E., & Matthews, K. A. (2001). Cognitive appraisal biases: An approach to understanding the relation between socioeconomic status and cardiovascular reactivity in children. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 23, 101–111.
- Chen, Z., Poon, K.-T., Bernstein, M. J., & Teng, F. (2014). Rejecting another pains the self: The impact of perceived future rejection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 225–233.
- Chen, Z., Teng, F., & Zhang, H. (2013). Sinful flesh: Sexual objectification threatens women's moral self. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 1042–1048.
- Czopp, A. M. (2008). When is a compliment not a compliment? Evaluating expressions of positive stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 413–420.
- DeWall, C., Twenge, J., Gitter, S., & Baumeister, R. (2009). It's the thought that counts: The role of hostile cognition in shaping aggressive responses to social exclusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 45–59.
- Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.
- Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1–74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Forbes, G. B., Collinsworth, L. L., Jobe, R. L., Braun, K. D., & Wise, L. M. (2007). Sexism, hostility toward women, and endorsement of beauty ideals and practices: Are beauty ideals associated with oppressive beliefs? Sex Roles, 56, 265–273.
- Fredrickson, B., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.
- Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M., Reynard, K., Skouteris, H., & McCabe, M. (2012). An examination of the contextual determinants of self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 76–87.
- Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J. A., & Liljenquist, K. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466.
- Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068–1074.
- Gallo, L. C., & Matthews, K. A. (2003). Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and physical health: Do negative emotions play a role? Psychological Bulletin, 129, 10–51.
- Gervais, S., Vescio, T., & Allen, J. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17.
- Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
- Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.
- Glick, P., Larsen, S., Johnson, C., & Branstiter, H. (2005). Evaluations of sexy women in low-and high-status jobs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 389–395.
- Gruenfeld, D., Inesi, M., Magee, J., & Galinsky, A. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127.
- Kawakami, K., Dunn, E., Karmali, F., & Dovidio, J. F. (2009). Mispredicting affective and behavioral responses to racism. Science, 323, 276–278.
- Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265–284.
-
Koss, M. P.,
Goodman, L. A.,
Browne, A.,
Fitzgerald, L. F.,
Keita, G. P., &
Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.1037/10156-000 Google Scholar
- Kraus, M. W., Horberg, E., Goetz, J. L., & Keltner, D. (2011). Social class rank, threat vigilance, and hostile reactivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1376–1388.
- Kurzban, R., & Leary, M. R. (2001). Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: The functions of social exclusion. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 187–208.
-
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1111/j.1432-2277.2005.00183.x Google Scholar
- Leary, M. R. (1990). Responses to social exclusion: Social anxiety, jealousy, loneliness, depression, and low self-esteem. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 221–229.
- Locksley, A., Borgida, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821–831.
- Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., Murnane, T., Vaes, J., Reynolds, C., & Suitner, C. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709–717.
- Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 42–55.
- Manis, M., Nelson, T. E., & Shedler, J. (1988). Stereotypes and social judgment: Extremity, assimilation, and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 28–36.
- Mathieu, M. T., & Gosling, S. D. (2012). The accuracy or inaccuracy of affective forecasts depends on how accuracy is indexed: A meta-analysis of past studies. Psychological Science, 23, 161–162.
- McKee, A. (2005). The objectification of women in mainstream pornographic videos in Australia. Journal of Sex Research, 42, 277–290.
- Mendoza-Denton, R., Downey, G., Purdie, V., Davis, A., & Pietrzak, J. (2002). Sensitivity to status-based rejection: Implications for African-American students' college experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 896–918.
- Mercurio, A. E., & Landry, L. J. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being: The impact of self-objectification on women's overall sense of self-worth and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 58, 458–466.
- Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (1983). The multidimensionality of psychopathology in a community sample. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 573–591.
- Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428.
- Page-Gould, E., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Tropp, L. (2008). With a little help from my cross-group friends: Reducing intergroup anxiety through cross-group friendship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1080–1094.
- Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 36, 717–731.
- Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
- Saguy, T., Quinn, D., Dovidio, J., & Pratto, F. (2010). Interacting like a body: Objectification can lead women to narrow their presence in social interactions. Psychological Science, 21, 178–182.
- Schwartz, D., Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1993). The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups. Child Development, 64, 1755–1772.
- Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification? Sex Roles, 52, 707–712.
- Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.
- Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: Evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53.
- Teng, F., & Chen, Z. (2012). Does social support reduce distress caused by ostracism? It depends on the level of one's self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1192–1195.
- Tiggemann, M., & Boundy, M.. (2008). Effect of environment and appearance compliment on college women's self objectification, mood, body shame, and cognitive performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 399–405.
- Wenze, S. J., Gunthert, K. C., & German, R. E. (2012). Biases in affective forecasting and recall in individuals with depression and anxiety symptoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 895–906.
- Williams, K. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 58, 425–452.
- Williams, K., Cheung, C., & Choi, W. (2000). Cyber ostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762.
