Volume 45, Issue 1 pp. 120-134
Research article

Human values, legal regulation, and approval of homosexuality in Europe: A cross-country comparison

Anabel Kuntz

Corresponding Author

Anabel Kuntz

University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Correspondence to: Anabel Kuntz, Research Training Group SOCLIFE, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauß-Straße 2, 50931 Cologne, Germany.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Eldad Davidov

Eldad Davidov

University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

The second and the third authors are listed in alphabetical order and contributed equally.

Search for more papers by this author
Shalom H. Schwartz

Shalom H. Schwartz

Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

National Research University—Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

The second and the third authors are listed in alphabetical order and contributed equally.

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Schmidt

Peter Schmidt

National Research University—Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 October 2014
Citations: 63

Abstract

Although research has revealed a trend toward liberalization of attitudes toward homosexuality in Western countries, acceptance of homosexuality differs remarkably among individuals and across countries. We examine the roles of individual value priorities and of national laws regarding homosexuality and the interaction between them in explaining approval of homosexuality. Data are drawn from the European Social Survey and include representative national samples of 27 European countries in 2010. As hypothesized, individuals who prioritized openness to change and universalism values approved of homosexuality more, whereas those who prioritized conservation and power values exhibited more disapproval. Approval was greater in countries whose laws regarding homosexuality were more progressive. In addition, legal regulation of homosexuality moderated the associations of individual value priorities. In countries with more progressive laws, both the positive effect of openness to change values and the negative effect of conservation values on approval of homosexuality were weaker. However, the positive effect of universalism values and the negative effect of power values did not vary as a function of national laws regarding homosexuality. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.