Hybrid model of generative adversarial network and Takagi-Sugeno for multidimensional incomplete hydrological big data prediction
Xiaoli Li
School of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorGuomei Song
School of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Zhenlong Du
School of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China
Correspondence Zhenlong Du, School of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorXiaoli Li
School of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorGuomei Song
School of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Zhenlong Du
School of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, China
Correspondence Zhenlong Du, School of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorFunding information: National Natural Science Foundation of China, 61672279
Summary
The processing of rainfall-runoff transmission in the catchment area is a very complex phenomenon, such as temporal and spatial changes of the catchment characteristics and uncertainties of rainfall patterns. To handle this challenge, data-driven hydrologic models emerge rapidly for the rainfall runoff prediction. However, the incomplete hydrological data constrain the development of digital hydrologic model. This article proposes a rainfall-runoff prediction method of coupling generative adversarial network (GAN) and Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy model, in which the GAN is used to generate the data for completing the incomplete hydrological data, and the T-S fuzzy model is utilized for forecasting the rainfall runoff. The presented method is examined by real data in Huaihe basin just considering the precipitation and streamflow. Experiments show that the model combined GAN and T-S can achieve satisfactory prediction results.
References
- 1Fiore U, Santis AD, Perla F, Zanetti P, Palmieri F. Using generative adversarial networks for improving classification effectiveness in credit card fraud detection. Inform Sci. 2019; 479: 448-455.
- 2Hashim R, Roy C, Motamedi S, Shamshirband S, Petkovic D. Selection of climatic parameters affecting wave height prediction using an enhanced Takagi-Sugeno-based fuzzy methodology. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016; 60: 246-257.
- 3Zhu X, Pedrycz W, Li Z. A design of granular Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy model through the synergy of fuzzy subspace clustering and optimal allocation of information granularity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2018; 26(5): 2499-2509.
- 4Shafaei S, Loghavi M, Kamgar S. Appraisal of Takagi-Sugeno-Kang type of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for draft force prediction of chisel plow implement. Comput Electron Agr. 2017; 142: 406-415.
- 5Lu H, Li Y, Chen M, Kim H, Serikawa S. Brain Intelligence: go beyond artificial intelligence. Mobile Netw Appl. 2018; 23(4): 368-375.
- 6AICHOURI I, HANI A, BOUGHERIRA N, DJABRI L, CHAFFAI H, LALLAHEM S. River flow model using artificial neural networks. ScienceDirect. 2015; 74: 1007-1014.
- 7Asadi S, Shahrabi J, Abbaszadeh P, Tabanmehr S. A new hybridartificial neural networks for rainfall–runoff process modeling. Neurocomputing. 2013; 121: 470-480.
- 8Shoaib M, Shamseldin AY, Melville BW. Comparative study of different wavelet based neural network models for rainfall–runoff modeling. J Hydrol. 2014; 515: 47-58.
- 9Senaviratne GA, Udawatta RP, Anderson SH, Baffaut C, Thompson A. Use of fuzzy rainfall-runoff predictions for claypan watersheds with conservation buffers in northeast Missouri. J Hydrol. 2014; 517: 1008-1018.
- 10Chang TK, Talei A, Alaghmand S, Chua LHC. Rainfall-runoff modeling using dynamic evolving neural fuzzy inference system with online learning. ScienceDirect. 2016; 154: 1103-1109.
- 11Chang TK, Talei A, Quek C, Pauwels VR. Rainfall-runoff modelling using a self-reliant fuzzy inference network with flexible structure. J Hydrol. 2018; 564: 1179-1193.
- 12Cho JH, Lee JH. Watershed model calibration framework developed using an influence coefficient algorithm and a genetic algorithm and analysis of pollutant discharge characteristics and load reduction in a TMDL planning area. J Env Manag. 2015; 163: 2-10.
- 13Chadalawada J, Havlipek V, Babovic V. Genetic programming based approach towards understanding the dynamics of urban rainfall-runoff process. ScienceDirect. 2016; 154: 1093-1102.
- 14Mehr AD, Nourani V. A Pareto-optimal moving average-multigene genetic programming model for rainfall-runoff modelling. Env Modell Softw. 2017; 92(C): 239-251.
- 15Behzad M, Asghari K, Eazi M, Palhang M. Generalization performance of support vector machines and neural networks in runoff modeling. Expert Syst Appl. 2009; 36(4): 7624-7629.
- 16Hosseini SM, Mahjouri N. Integrating support vector regression and a geomorphologic artificial neural network for daily rainfall-runoff modeling. Appl Soft Comput. 2016; 38: 329-345.
- 17Roy A, Manna R, Chakraborty S. Support vector regression based metamodeling for structural reliability analysis. Probab Eng Mech. 2019; 55: 78-89.
- 18Khaki M, Ait-El-Fquih B, Hoteit I, Forootan E, Awange J, Kuhn M. A two-update ensemble Kalman filter for land hydrological data assimilation with an uncertain constraint. J Hydrol. 2017; 555(C): 447-462.
- 19Zou L, Zhan C, Xia J, Wang T, Gippel CJ. Implementation of evapotranspiration data assimilation with catchment scale distributed hydrological model via an ensemble Kalman filter. J Hydrol. 2017; 549: 685-702.
- 20Kashani MH, Ghorbani MA, Dinpashoh Y, Shahmorad S. Integration of Volterra model with artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff simulation in forested catchment of northern Iran. J Hydrol. 2016; 540: 340-354.
- 21Bartoletti N, Casagli F, Marsili-Libelli S, Nardi A, Palandri L. Data-driven rainfall/runoff modelling based on a neuro-fuzzy inference system. Env Modell Softw. 2018; 106: 1-13.
- 22Chlumecky M, Buchtele J, Richta K. Application of random number generators in genetic algorithms to improve rainfall-runoff modelling. J Hydrol. 2017; 553: 350-355.
- 23Karaca E, Tunga MA. A method for inpainting rectangular missing regions using high dimensional model representation and lagrange interpolation. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2016 24th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference (SIU); 2016:1349-1352.
- 24Ishak F, Ahmad SN. Solving delay differential equations by predictor-corrector method using Lagrange and Hermite interpolations. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Colloquium on Humanities, Science and Engineering; 2011:932-934; IEEE.
- 25Rokhman N. Solving non-linear equations containing spline interpolation function by relaxing the Newton method. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2017 2nd International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC); 2017:1-5.
- 26Colalongo L, Richelli A, Kovács-Vajna ZM. Hermite interpolation method (HiM): compact surface potential MOSFET model based on the Hermite polynomial. IET J Mag. 2016; 52: 1490-1492.
- 27Li Y, Xiao N, Ouyang W. Improved generative adversarial networks with reconstruction loss. Neurocomputing. 2019; 323: 363-372.
- 28Han C, Hayashi H, Rundo L, et al. Gan-based synthetic brain Mr image generation. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI 2018); 2018:734-738; IEEE.
- 29Yang H, Li Y, Yan X, Cao F. ContourGAN: image contour detection with generative adversarial network. Knowl-Based Syst. 2019; 164: 21-28.
- 30Salgado CM, Viegas JL, Azevedo CS, Ferreira MC, Vieira SM, Sousa JMC. Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy modeling using mixed fuzzy clustering. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2016; 25(6): 1417-1429.
- 31Soares E Jr, Costa PC, Costa B, Leite D. Ensemble of evolving data clouds and fuzzy models for weather timeseries prediction. Appl Soft Comput. 2018; 64: 445-453.
- 32Xie X, Lin L, Zhong S. Process Takagi–Sugeno model: a novel approach for handling continuous input and output functions and its application to time series prediction. Know-Based Syst. 2014; 63: 46-58.
- 33Guo F, Lin L, Wang C. Novel continuous function prediction model using an improved Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy rule and its application based on chaotic time series. Eng Appl Art Intell. 2016; 55: 155-164.
- 34Talei A, Chua LHC, Quek C, Jansson PE. Runoff forecasting using a Takagi–Sugeno neuro-fuzzy model with online learning. J Hydrol. 2013; 488: 17-32.
- 35Chang PC, Wu JL, Lin JJ. A Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy model combined with a support vector regression for stock trading forecasting. Appl Soft Comput. 2016; 38: 831-842.
- 36Marin LG, Cruz N, Saez D, Sumner M, Núñez A. Prediction interval methodology based on fuzzy numbers and its extension to fuzzy systems and neural networks. Expert Syst Appl. 2019; 119: 128-141.
- 37Zhao B, Ren Y, Gao D, Xu L. Prediction of service life of large centrifugal compressor remanufactured impeller based on clustering rough set and fuzzy Bandelet neural network. Appl Soft Comput J. 2019; 78: 132-140.
- 38Meng S, Xie X, Liang S. Assimilation of soil moisture and streamflow observations to improve flood forecasting with considering runoff routing lags. J Hydrol. 2017; 550: 568-579.
- 39Jacquin AP, Shamseldin AY. Development of rainfall–runoff models using Takagi–Sugeno fuzzy inference systems. J Hydrol. 2006; 329: 154-173.