Impact of optimization algorithms on hybrid indoor positioning based on GSM and Wi-Fi signals
Corresponding Author
Juraj Machaj
University of Zilina, FEE, Department of Telecommunications and Multimedia, Zilina, Slovakia
Correspondence to: Juraj Machaj, University of Zilina, FEE, Department of Telecommunications and Multimedia, Zilina, Slovakia.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Brida
University of Zilina, FEE, Department of Telecommunications and Multimedia, Zilina, Slovakia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Juraj Machaj
University of Zilina, FEE, Department of Telecommunications and Multimedia, Zilina, Slovakia
Correspondence to: Juraj Machaj, University of Zilina, FEE, Department of Telecommunications and Multimedia, Zilina, Slovakia.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorPeter Brida
University of Zilina, FEE, Department of Telecommunications and Multimedia, Zilina, Slovakia
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
In the recent time indoor positioning becomes an extremely hot topic between researchers worldwide. This is mainly because of lack of available positioning solutions in the indoor environment and possibility to offer novel services based on location of users. Such services can also open new markets for service providers and thus increase their income. In this paper we will focus on application of optimization algorithms on performance of hybrid indoor positioning system, which utilize radio signals from both Global System for Mobile communication and Wi-Fi networks simultaneously. The system is based on fingerprinting framework, which is widely used for indoor positioning because of its performance in strong multipath environment. Tests of the optimization algorithms were performed via simulations that were performed using simulation model created in Matlab environment. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
- 1Andreotti M, Aquino M, Woolfson M, Walker J, Moore T. Signal propagation analysis and signature extraction for GNSS indoor positioning. 2006 IEEE/ION Position, Location, And Navigation Symposium, pp. 913–919, doi: 10.1109/PLANS.2006.1650691
- 2Wen YH, Chang HS, Kao HW, Ju GH. Location-aware services based on Wi-Fi network. 16th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium (APNOMS), 2014, pp. 1–4., doi: 10.1109/APNOMS.2014.6996533
- 3Horalek J, Sobeslav V, Krejcar O, Balik L. Communications and security aspects of smart grid networks design. Communications in Computer and Information Science 2014; 465: 35–46. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11958-8_4.
- 4Lategahn J, Muller M, Rohrig C. Robust pedestrian localization in indoor environments with an IMU aided TDoA system, 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), pp. 465–472, doi: 10.1109/IPIN.2014.7275518
- 5Mautz R, Tilch S. Survey of optical indoor positioning systems, 2011 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), pp. 1–7, doi: 10.1109/IPIN.2011.6071925
- 6Shen HM, Hu L, Qin LH, Fu X. Real-time orientation-invariant magnetic localization and sensor calibration based on closed-form models. IEEE Magnetics Letters 2015; 6: 1–4. doi:10.1109/LMAG.2015.2460211.
- 7Fang SH, Wang CH, Huang TY, Yang CH, Chen YS. An enhanced ZigBee indoor positioning system with an ensemble approach. IEEE Communications Letters April 2012; 16(4): 564–567. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2012.022112.120131.
- 8Jianyong Z, Haiyong L, Zili Ch, Zhaohui L. RSSI based Bluetooth low energy indoor positioning. 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), 2014, pp. 526–533, doi: 10.1109/IPIN.2014.7275525
- 9Muller P, Wymeersch H, Piche R. UWB positioning with generalized Gaussian mixture filters. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing Oct. 2014; 13(10): 2406–2414. doi:10.1109/TMC.2014.2307301.
- 10Grzenda M. Reduction of signal strength data for fingerprinting-based indoor positioning. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning–IDEAL 2015, Springer International Publishing, 2015. p. 387–394, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-24834-9_45
- 11Ibrahim M, Youssef M. CellSense: an accurate energy-efficient GSM positioning system. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology Jan. 2012; 61(1): 286–296. doi:10.1109/TVT.2011.2173771.
- 12Veletic M, Šunjevarić M. Optimal positioning in UMTS using least mean squares algorithm on circular lateration. 20th Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR), 2012, Belgrade, 2012, pp. 334–337, doi: 10.1109/TELFOR.2012.6419215
- 13Kangas A, Wigren T. Angle of arrival localization in LTE using MIMO pre-coder index feedback. IEEE Communications Letters August 2013; 17(8): 1584–1587. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2013.062113.130870.
- 14Baniukevic A, Jensen CS, Lu H. Hybrid indoor positioning with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth: architecture and performance. 2013 IEEE 14th International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM), Milan, 2013, pp. 207–216, doi: 10.1109/MDM.2013.30
- 15Galván-Tejada CE, Carrasco-Jiménez JC, Brena RF. Bluetooth-WiFi based combined positioning algorithm, implementation and experimental evaluation. Procedia Technology 7:2013, 37-45, ISSN 2212-0173, doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2013.04.005
- 16Machaj J, Brida P. Using GSM and Wi-Fi signals for indoor positioning based on fingerprinting algorithm. Advances in Electrical and Electronics Engineering 2015; 13(3): 242–248. doi:10.15598/aeeev13i31241.
10.15598/aeeev13i31241 Google Scholar
- 17Machaj J, Brida P, Benikovsky J. Scalability optimization of seamless positioning service. Mobile information systems (in review)
- 18Honkavirta V, Perälä T, Ali-Löytty S, Piché R. A comparative survey of WLAN location fingerprinting methods, 6th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication, WPNC 2009, pp: 243– 251, 2009, doi: 10.1109/WPNC.2009.4907834
- 19Saha S, Chauhuri K, Sanghi D, Bhagwat P. Location determination of a mobile device using IEEE 802.11b access point signals. 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, WCNC 2003, vol. 3, pp. 1987–1992, 2003, doi: 10.1109/WCNC.2003.1200692
- 20Bahl P, Padmanabhan VN. RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, INFOCOM 2000, ISBN: 0-7803-5880-5, 2000, doi: 0.1109/INFCOM.2000.832252
- 21Machaj J, Brida P. Performance comparison of similarity measurements for database correlation localization method. 3rd Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems, ACIIDS 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 2011, vol. 6592, ch. 46, pp. 452–461, ISBN 978-3-642-20041-0, 2011, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20042-7_46
- 22Tsung-Nan L, Po-Chiang L. Performance comparison of indoor positioning techniques based on location fingerprinting in wireless networks. 2005 International Conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing, Vol. 2, 2005, doi: 10.1109/WIRLES.2005.1549647
- 23Machaj J, Brida P, Benikovsky J. Impact of APs removal on accuracy of fingerprinting localization algorithms. 2015 38th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP), 2015, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.7296384
- 24Brida P, Machaj J, Benikovsky J. A modular localization system as a positioning service for road transport. Sensors 2014; 14(11): 20274–20296. doi:10.3390/s141120274.
- 25Machaj J, Brida P. Performance investigation of the RBF localization algorithm. Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 100–107, ISSN 1336-1376, 2013, doi: 10.15598/aeee.v11i2.761
- 26Lott M, Forkel I. A multi-wall-and-floor model for indoor radio propagation. 53rd IEEE VTS Vehicular Technology Conference, 2001. VTC 2001 Spring, vol.1, pp.464–468, 2001 doi: 10.1109/VETECS.2001.944886
- 27Ata OW, Shahateet AM, Jawadeh MI, Amro AI. An indoor propagation model based on a novel multi wall attenuation loss formula at frequencies 900 MHz and 2.4 GHz. Wireless Personal Communications, Vol. 69, Issue: 1, pp. 23-36, ISSN: 0929-6212, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11277-012-0558-x
10.1007/s11277-012-0558-x Google Scholar
- 28 ETSI/TC: digital cellular telecommunications system (phase 2); AT command set for GSM Mobile Equipment (ME), ETS 300 642, GSM 07.07 version 4.4.1, 1999
Citing Literature
10 December 2017
e3911
