Early View
ORIGINAL ARTICLE - CLINICAL SCIENCE

Discontinuation of Antithrombotic Management Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in High Bleeding Risk Patients

Siu-Fung Wong

Corresponding Author

Siu-Fung Wong

Department of Cardiology, Sussex Cardiac Centre, University Hospitals Sussex, Brighton, UK

Correspondence: Siu-Fung Wong ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
James W. McCready

James W. McCready

Department of Cardiology, Sussex Cardiac Centre, University Hospitals Sussex, Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
James Cockburn

James Cockburn

Department of Cardiology, Sussex Cardiac Centre, University Hospitals Sussex, Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher Broyd

Christopher Broyd

Department of Cardiology, Sussex Cardiac Centre, University Hospitals Sussex, Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Timothy Bagnall

Timothy Bagnall

Department of Cardiology, Sussex Cardiac Centre, University Hospitals Sussex, Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Sandeep Arunothayaraj

Sandeep Arunothayaraj

St Vincent's Heart Centre, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Arionilson Gomes

Arionilson Gomes

Department of Cardiology, Sussex Cardiac Centre, University Hospitals Sussex, Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew Hill

Andrew Hill

Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
David Hildick-Smith

David Hildick-Smith

Department of Cardiology, Sussex Cardiac Centre, University Hospitals Sussex, Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 July 2025

ABSTRACT

Background

Antithrombotic therapy is required after left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) whilst endothelialization of the device occurs. LAAO patients are usually at high bleeding risk and the optimal antithrombotic regimen post-implantation remains debated.

Aims

We aimed to study the efficacy of using maximum of 6-month antithrombotic treatment post-LAAO in high bleeding risk patients with atrial fibrillation.

Methods

Data from patients who had LAAO at our center between 2015 and 2024 were examined. Those who were discharged on a plan of 6 months antithrombotic therapy were included. Incidence of stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), major bleeding or death during follow-up was measured.

Results

A total of 128 patients met the analysis criteria. One hundred and six (82.8%) patients had a previous major bleeding event with or without oral anticoagulation. Seventy-eight (60.9%) patients had a previous stroke. The median CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4 and 3 respectively. Complete closure of the left atrial appendage was achieved in 116 (90.6%) patients with no peri-device flow. Follow-up was obtained for 484 patient-years (median follow-up time 3.6 years). Post-procedure, 126 (98.4%) patients had antiplatelet therapy only, for 6 months or less. Stroke or TIA occurred in 5.5% of patients (1.45 per 100 patient-years)—a 69% reduction compared to the predicted risk. 10.2% of patients suffered from major bleeding (2.69 per 100 patient-years). 36.7% (9.71 per 100 patient-years) of patients died.

Conclusion

Complete cessation of antithrombotic treatment 6 months after LAAO was associated with a low incidence of subsequent stroke or TIA in patients at high bleeding risk.

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. James Cockburn reports he is a proctor/advisory for Boston and Medtronic. Dr. Sandeep Arunothayaraj reports he is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. Prof David Hildick-Smith reports he is a proctor/advisory for Boston, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic and Abbott. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.