Volume 70, Issue 5 pp. 641-645
Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical relevance of coronary angiography at the time of percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale

Andreas Wahl MD

Andreas Wahl MD

Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Fabien Praz MD

Fabien Praz MD

Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Christian Seiler MD

Christian Seiler MD

Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Stephan Windecker MD

Stephan Windecker MD

Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Bernhard Meier MD

Corresponding Author

Bernhard Meier MD

Cardiology, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Swiss Cardiovascular Center Bern, University Hospital, 3010 Bern, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 09 July 2007
Citations: 8

Abstract

Background:

The value of incidental coronary angiography during percutaneous shunt closure to screen for asymptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) is unknown.

Methods:

On the occasion of percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale (PFO), incidental coronary angiography routinely offered to men >40 and women >50 years, or younger patients with particular risk patterns, was performed in 575 patients (64% men, mean age 55 ± 10 years, mean 1.5 ± 1.1 cardiovascular risk factors) without overt history, signs, or symptoms of CAD.

Results:

CAD was found in 164 patients (29%); 53 (9%) had ≥50% diameter stenoses. Thirty patients (5%) had one-vessel, 13 (2%) two-vessel, and 10 (2%) three-vessel disease. Patients with CAD (n = 164) were older (60 ± 9 vs. 53 ± 10 years; P < 0.0001), more frequently male (76% vs. 59%; P = 0.0002), and had a higher body mass index (26.5 ± 4.0 vs. 25.4 ± 4.6; P = 0.006) and more cardiovascular risk factors (2.0 ± 1.1 vs. 1.2 ± 1.0; P < 0.0001). There were six procedural complications (1%). Two were unequivocally related to coronary angiography: one minor stroke (diplopia), and one iatrogenic dissection of the right coronary ostium requiring stenting. Furthermore, four arteriovenous fistulae at the puncture site requiring elective surgical closure were possibly related to coronary angiography. Forty-five patients (8% of total) underwent percutaneous (n = 43) or surgical (n = 2) revascularization.

Conclusions:

In selected asymptomatic patients referred for percutaneous PFO closure, incidental coronary angiography discloses a rather high prevalence of clinically unsuspected CAD. These findings are relevant not only for timely revascularization but also for maintenance of long-term antiplatelet therapy beyond the few months recommended after PFO closure. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.