Volume 61, Issue 3 pp. 403-410
Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease

Percutaneous closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects with the Amplatzer device: Technical and morphological considerations

Carlos A.C. Pedra MD

Corresponding Author

Carlos A.C. Pedra MD

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Av. Dr. Dante Pazzanese 500, CEP 04012-180, São Paulo, BrazilSearch for more papers by this author
Simone R.F. Pedra MD

Simone R.F. Pedra MD

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Cesar A. Esteves MD

Cesar A. Esteves MD

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Sérgio C. Pontes Jr. MD

Sérgio C. Pontes Jr. MD

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Sérgio L.N. Braga MD

Sérgio L.N. Braga MD

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
S. Raul Arrieta MD

S. Raul Arrieta MD

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
M. Virgínia T. Santana MD

M. Virgínia T. Santana MD

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Valmir F. Fontes MD

Valmir F. Fontes MD

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Jozef Masura MD

Jozef Masura MD

Children's Cardiac Center, University Children's Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 February 2004
Citations: 106

Abstract

Percutaneous closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects (VSDs) has been feasible, safe, and effective with the new Amplatzer membranous septal occluder. We report further experience with this device with emphasis on morphological aspects of the VSDs and technical issues. Ten patients (median age and weight, 14 years and 34.5 kg, respectively) with volume-overloaded left ventricles underwent closure under general anesthesia and transesophageal guidance (TEE). The VSD diameter was 7.1 ± 4.0 mm by angiography and 7.8 ± 3.7 mm by TEE. Three patients had defects associated with aneurysm-like formations (two with multiple exit holes), four had defects shrouded by extensive tricuspid valve tissue, two had defects with little or no tricuspid valve involvement, and one had a right aortic cusp prolapse with trivial aortic regurgitation. Implantation was successful in all patients, although in two the initial device had to be changed for a larger one. Kinkings in the delivery sheath, inability to position the sheath near the left ventricular apex, and device prolapse through the VSD prompted modifications in the standard technique of implantation. Device orientation was excellent except in one case. Nine patients had complete occlusion within 1–3 months. Device-related aortic or tricuspid insufficiency, arrhythmias, and embolization were not observed. Two patients had slight gradients across the left ventricular outflow tract, normalizing after 3 months. The Amplatzer membranous septal occluder was suitable to close a wide range of perimembranous VSD sizes and morphologies with good short-term outcomes. Longer follow-up is required. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:403–410. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.