Volume 61, Issue 3 pp. 293-305
Peripheral Vascular Disease

Carotid angioplasty under cerebral protection with the percusurge guardwire system

Michel Henry MD

Corresponding Author

Michel Henry MD

Cabinet de CardioLogie, Nancy, France

Global Research Institute, Apollo Clinic, Hyderabad, India

80 rue Raymond Poìncaré, 54000 Nancy, FranceSearch for more papers by this author
Antonios Polydorou MD

Antonios Polydorou MD

General Hospital St. Panteleimon, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Isabelle Henry MD

Isabelle Henry MD

Polyclinique de Bois Benard, Rouvroy, France

Search for more papers by this author
Adamantia Polydorou MD

Adamantia Polydorou MD

General Hospital St. Panteleimon, Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Michel Hugel

Michel Hugel

Cabinet de CardioLogie, Nancy, France

Global Research Institute, Apollo Clinic, Hyderabad, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 February 2004
Citations: 36

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the possible beneficial effect of the PercuSurge GuardWire cerebral protection device based on balloon occlusion of the distal internal carotid artery and debris aspiration for patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). A total of 268 CAS procedures were attempted under cerebral protection using the PercuSurge GuardWire system in 242 patients (194 men; mean age, 71.2 ± 9.4 years; range, 40–91). The lesions were mainly atherosclerotic; 64% were symptomatic. Technical success was 99.3%. All lesions were stented except three postangioplasty restenoses. Prophylactic occlusion during balloon dilatation and stenting was well tolerated in 255 patients (95.9%). Microscopic analysis of the aspirated blood showed different types of particles numbering between 7 and 145 per procedure, with a mean diameter of 250 μm (mean, 56–2,652 μm). The 30-day stroke and death rate was 2.3%, with four periprocedural complications at < 48 hr (one retinal embolism and three transient ischemic attacks), one intracerebral hemorrhage at 3 days, and one death of cardiac failure at 3 weeks. This technique appears safe and efficient with a low rate of periprocedural embolic events. Protection devices seem indispensable to perform CAS and expand the applicability of the procedure. Randomized studies (surgery vs. CAS with and without cerebral protection) are awaited. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004;61:293–305. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.