Volume 56, Issue 2 pp. 281-288
Board Review

Intracoronary brachytherapy

Phong Nguyen-Ho MD

Phong Nguyen-Ho MD

The Methodist DeBakey Heart Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Grzegorz L. Kaluza MD, PhD

Grzegorz L. Kaluza MD, PhD

The Methodist DeBakey Heart Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Pawel T. Zymek MD

Pawel T. Zymek MD

The Methodist DeBakey Heart Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Albert E. Raizner MD

Corresponding Author

Albert E. Raizner MD

The Methodist DeBakey Heart Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

The Methodist DeBakey Heart Center, 6535 Fannin, Room FB 1034, Houston, TX 77030Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 May 2002
Citations: 11

Abstract

Patients presenting with in-stent restenosis have an increased risk of need for repeat intervention. Intracoronary brachytherapy is indicated for these patients to prevent recurrent in-stent restenosis. Three intravascular brachytherapy systems are currently FDA-approved for use in patients: one utilizing gamma-radiation (Cordis) and two using beta-radiation (Novoste and Guidant). Current evidence and labeling do not support using intracoronary brachytherapy for prevention of restenosis in de novo lesions. Brachytherapy is absolutely contraindicated in patients unable to take prolonged combination antiplatelet drugs. Aspirin and a thienopyridine should be taken for 6 months if no new stent is placed and 12 months if a new stent is placed. If possible, new stent implementation should be avoided. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2002;56:281–288. © 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.