Editorial Comment
Closure devices: Case closed?
First published: 20 December 2001
No abstract is available for this article.
REFERENCES
- 1
Khoukaz S,
Kern MJ,
Bitar SR,
Azrak E,
Eisenhauer M,
Wolford T,
El-Shafei A.
Coronary angiography using 4 Fr catheters with acisted power injection: a randomized comparison to 6 Fr manual technique and early ambulation.
Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent
2001;
52:
393–398.
- 2
Kahn MK,
Kumar M,
Hollander G,
Shani J,
Frankel R.
Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture mediated closure device after diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in a large consecutive population.
Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent
2002;
55:
8–13.
- 3
Takagi T,
Finci G,
Stankovic G,
Corvaja N,
Albiero R,
Vaghetti M,
Di Mario C,
Colombo A.
Infectious complications following usage of a suture based closure device after percutaneous vascular interventions.
Eur Heart J
2001;
22:
662.
- 4
Dangas G,
Mehran R,
Kokolis S,
Feldman D,
Satler LF,
Pichard AD,
Kent KM,
Lansky AJ,
Stone GW,
Leon MB.
Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices.
J Am Coll Cardiol
2001;
38:
638–641.
