Effect of Drought Stress on Certain Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of a Resistant and a Sensitive Canola Cultivar
Ghorban Khodabin
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1411713116 Iran
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Zeinolabedin Tahmasebi-Sarvestani
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1411713116 Iran
Search for more papers by this authorAmir Hossein Shirani Rad
Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, 3135933151 Iran
Search for more papers by this authorSeyed Ali Mohammad Modarres-Sanavy
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1411713116 Iran
Search for more papers by this authorGhorban Khodabin
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1411713116 Iran
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Zeinolabedin Tahmasebi-Sarvestani
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1411713116 Iran
Search for more papers by this authorAmir Hossein Shirani Rad
Seed and Plant Improvement Institute (SPII), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, 3135933151 Iran
Search for more papers by this authorSeyed Ali Mohammad Modarres-Sanavy
Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 1411713116 Iran
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Water stress is one of the main abiotic factors that reduces plant growth, mainly due to high evaporative demand and low water availability. In order to evaluate the effects of drought stress on certain morphological and physiological characteristics of two canola cultivars, we conducted a factorial experiment based on a completely randomized design. The findings show that drought stress exacerbations result in the plant's response to stress due to increased canola resistance caused by changes in plant pigments, proline, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and malondialdehyde, glucose, galactose, rhamnose and xylose. These in turn ultimately influence the morphological characteristics of canola. Drought stress reduces the concentration of carotenoids, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls; however, glucose, galactose, rhamnose, xylose, proline, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde (in leaves and roots) and the chlorophyll a and b ratios were increased. Reduction of plant height, stem height, root length, fresh and dry weight of canola treated with 300 g/l PEG compared to non-treatment were 0.264, 0.236, 0.394, 0.183 and 0.395, respectively. From the two canola cultivars, the morphological characteristics of the NIMA increased compared to the Ks7 cultivar. Interaction effects of cultivar and drought stress showed that NIMA cultivar without treatment had the highest number of morphological characteristics such as carotenoid concentration, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophylls a and b, whereas the cultivar with 300 g/l PEG (drought stress) had the highest amount of proline, malondialdehyde, soluble sugars and enzymes in leaves and roots. Increasing activity of oxidative enzymes and soluble sugars in canola under drought stress could be a sign of their relative tolerance to drought stress.
Graphical Abstract
References
- 1M. S. Lum, M. M. Hanafi, Y. M. Rafii, A. S. N. Akmar, ‘Effect of Drought Stress on Growth, Proline and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Upland Rice’, J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 24, 1487–1493.
- 2C. A. Jaleel, P. Manivannan, A. Wahid, M. Farooq, H. J. Al-Juburi, R. Somasundaram, R. Panneerselvam, ‘Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition’, Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2009, 11, 100–105.
- 3H. Keshavarz, S. A. M. Modares-Sanavy, M. Mahdipour Afra, ‘Organic and Chemical Fertilizer Affected Yield and Essential Oil of Two Mint Species’, J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2018, 21, 1674–1681.
- 4H. Keshavarz, R. Sadegh Ghol Moghadam, ‘Seed priming with cobalamin (vitamin B12) provides significant protection against salinity stress in the common bean’, Rhizosphere 2016, 3, 143–149.
10.1016/j.rhisph.2017.04.010 Google Scholar
- 5O. Azarpanah, Alizadeh, H. Dehghanzadeh, ‘Investigation on proline and carbohydrates accumulation in Zea mays L. under water stress condition’, ELBA Bioflux. 2013, 5, 47–54.
- 6H. R. Balouchi, S. A. M. M. Sanavy, Y. Emam, A. Dolatabadian, ‘UV radiation, elevated CO2 and water stress effect on growth and photosynthetic characteristics in durum wheat’, Plant Soil Environ. 2009, 55, 443–453.
- 7B. Mahdavi, S. A. M. Modarres Sanavy, M. Aghaalikhani, M. Sharifi, A. Dolatabadian, ‘Chitosan Improves Osmotic Potential Tolerance in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Seedlings’, J. Crop Improv. 2011, 25, 728–741.
- 8H. Hassanpour, V. Niknam, ‘Effect of water deficit stress on growth and antioxidant enzyme activity of Mentha pulegium L. at flowering stage’, Plant Proc. Funct. J. 2014, 3, 25–34.
- 9W.-B. Wang, Y.-H. Kim, H−S Lee, K.-Y. Kim, X.-P. Deng, ‘Analysis of antioxidant enzyme activity during germination of alfalfa under salt and drought stresses’, Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2009, 47, 570–577.
- 10U. Ozgen, A. Mavi, Z. Terzi, A. Yildirim, M. Coskun, P. J. Houghton, ‘Antioxidant properties of some medicinal Lamiaceae (Labiatae) species’, Pharm. Biol. 2006, 44, 107–112.
- 11M. Farooq, M. Hussain, K. H. M. Siddique, ‘Drought stress in wheat during flowering and grain-filling periods’, Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2014, 33, 331–349.
- 12F. Tian, J. Gong, J. Zhang, M. Zhang, G. Wang, A. Li, W. Wang, ‘Enhanced stability of thylakoid membrane proteins and antioxidant competence contribute to drought stress resistance in the tasg1 wheat stay-green mutant’, J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 1509–1520.
- 13K. Taïbi, F. Taïbi, L. A. Abderrahim, A. Ennajah, M. Belkhodja, J. M. Mulet, ‘Effect of salt stress on growth, chlorophyll content, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defense systems in Phaseolus vulgaris L.’, S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 105, 306–312.
- 14Sh. Keyvan, ‘The effects of drought stress on yield, relative water content, proline, soluble carbohydrates and chlorophyll of bread wheat cultivars’, J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 8, 1051–1060.
- 15S. K. Singh, K. Raja Reddy, ‘Regulation of photosynthesis, fluorescence, stomatal conductance and water-use efficiency of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) under drought stress’, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2011, 105, 40–50.
- 16A. Ali, N. Ali, N. Ullah, F. Ullah, M. Adnan, Z. A. Swati, ‘Effect of Drought Stress on the Physiology and Yield of the Pakistani Wheat Germplasms’, Int. J. Adv. Res. Technol. 2013, 7, 419–430.
- 17M. Gholamhoseini, A. Ghalavand, A. Khodaei-Joghan, A. Dolatabadian, H. Zakikhani, E. Farmanbar, ‘Zeolite-amended cattle manure effects on sunflower yield, seed quality, water use efficiency and nutrient leaching’, Soil Tillage Res. 2013, 126, 193–202.
- 18I. Yavas, A. Unay, ‘Effects of zinc and salicylic acid on wheat under drought stress’, J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 26, 1012–1018.
- 19M. Zabet, A. H. Hoseinzadeh, ‘Determinatin of the most effective traits on yield in mung bean (vigna radiata L. Wilczek) by multivariate analysis in stress and non-stress conditions’, Iran. J. Pulses Res. 2011, 2, 87–98.
- 20S. Lack, A. Naderi, S. A. Siadat, A. Ayenehband, G. H. Nourmohammadi, S. H. Moosavi, ‘The effects of different levels of irrigation, nitrogen and plant population on yield, yield components and dry matter remobilization of corn at climatic conditions of Khuzestan’, J. Sci. Technol. 2008, 11, 1–14.
- 21S. Chegah, M. Chehrazi, M. Albaji, ‘Effects of drought stress on growth and development Frankenia plant (Frankenia Leavis)’, Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 2013, 19, 659–666.
- 22A. Mafakheri, A. Siosemardeh, B. Bahramnejad, P. C. Struik, Y. Sohrabi, ‘Effect of drought stress and subsequent recovery on protein, carbohydrate contents, catalase and peroxidase activities in three chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars’, Aust. J. Sci. 2011, 5, 1255–1260.
- 23N. Jangpromma, S. Thammasirirak, P. Jaisil, P. Songsri, ‘Effects of drought and recovery from drought stress on above ground and root growth, and water use efficiency in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)’, Aust. J. Sci. 2012, 6, 1298–1304.
- 24B. A. Fakheri, S. M. Mousavi Nick, R. Mohammadpour Vashvaei, ‘Effect of drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol on germination and morphological properties of fennel and ajowan’, J. Crop. Sci. Res. Arid Regions 2017, 1, 35–50.
- 25M. B. Khan, M. Hussain, A. Raza, S. Farooq, K. Jabran, ‘Seed priming with CaCl2 and ridge planting for improved drought resistance in maize’, Turk. J. Agric. For. 2015, 39, 193–203.
- 26M. Khayatnezhad, M. Zaeifizadeh, R. Gholamin, ‘Effect of end-season drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence and content of antioxidant enzyme superoxide dismutase enzyme (SOD) in susceptible and tolerant genotypes of durum wheat’, Afr. J. Agri. Res. 2011, 6, 6397–6406.
- 27N. Bibi, A. Hameed, H. Ali, N. Iqbal, M. A. Haq, B. M. Atta, T. M. Shah, S. S. Alam, ‘Water stress induced variations in protein profiles of germinating cotyledons from seedlings of chickpea genotypes’, Pak. J. Bot. 2009, 41, 731–736.
- 28R. Mathobo, D. Marais, J. M. Steyn, ‘The effect of drought stress on yield, leaf gaseous exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)’, Agric. Water Manage. 2017, 180, 118–125.
- 29A. Mafakheri, A. Siosemardeh, B. Bahramnejad, P. C. Struik, Y. Sohrabi, ‘Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars’, Aust. J. Sci. 2010, 4, 580–585.
- 30M. Lonbani, A. Arzani, ‘Morpho-physiological traits associated with terminal drought-stress tolerance in triticale and wheat’, Agric. Res. 2011, 9, 315–329.
- 31R. Guo, W. P. Hao, D. Z. Gong, X. L. Zhong, F. X. Gu, ‘Effects of Water Stress on Germination and Growth of Wheat, Photosynthetic Efficiency and Accumulation of Metabolites’, Chapter 13, in Soil Processes and Current Trends in Quality Assessment, M. C. Hernandez Soriano, Ed., IntechOpen, 2013, pp. 367–380; DOI: 10.5772/51205.
- 32M. Y. Ashraf, A. R. Azmi, A. H. Khan, S. A. Ala, ‘Effect of water stress on total phenols, peroxidase activity and chlorophyll content in wheat’, Acta Physiol. Plant. 1994, 16, 185–191.
- 33S. Navabpour, S. S. Ramezanpour, A. Mazandarani, ‘Evaluation of Enzymatic and Non-enzymatic Defense Mechanism in Response to Drought Stress During Growth Stage in Soybean’, Plant Prod. Tec. 2016, 15, 63–73.
- 34P. Sharifi, N. Mohammad Khani, ‘Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis factors in wheat genotypes during anthesis’, Cereal Res. Commun. 2016, 44, 229–239.
- 35P. Shivakrishna, K. A. Reddy, D. M. Rao, ‘Effect of PEG-6000 imposed drought stress on RNA content, relative water content (RWC), and chlorophyll content in peanut leaves and roots’, Saudi. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 25, 285–289.
- 36X. Liang, L. Zhang, S. K. Natarajan, D. F. Becker, ‘Proline Mechanisms of Stress Survival’, Antioxid. Redox Signaling 2013, 19, 998–1011.
- 37P. Allah Moradi, C. Mansourifar, M. Saidi, S. J. Honarmand, ‘Water deficiency and its effects on grain yield and some physiological traits during different growth stages in lentil (Lens culinaris L.) cultivars’, Ann. Biol. 2013, 4, 139–145.
- 38H. Keshavarz, S. A. M. Modarres Sanavy, R. Sadegh Gol Moghadam, ‘Impact of Foliar Application with Salicylic Acid on Biochemical Characters of Canola Plants under Cold Stress Condition’, Not. Sci. Biol. 2016, 8, 98–105.
- 39S. A. Mallick, M. Gupta, S. K. Mondal, B. K. Sinha, ‘Characterization of wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes on the basis of metabolic changes associated with water stress’, Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 81, 767–771.
- 40R. A. Shawon, B. S. Kang, H. C. Kim, S. G. Lee, S. K. Kim, H. J. Lee, J. H. Bae, Y. K. Ku, ‘Changes in Free Amino Acid, Carotenoid, and Proline Content in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa subsp. Pekinensis) in Response to Drought Stress’, Korean J. Plant Res. 2018, 31, 622–633.
- 41H. Keshavarz, G. Khodabin, ‘The Role of Uniconazole in Improving Physiological and Biochemical Attributes of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Subjected to Drought Stress’, J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 2019, 22, 161–168.
10.1007/s12892-019-0050-0 Google Scholar
- 42F. S. Seyed Ebrahimi, H. Hassani Kumleh, A. Alami, M. H. Rezadoost, ‘Effect of Drought Stress on Morphological Traits and Antioxidant Enzymatic Activity in Two canola Varieties’, J. Plant Proc. Func. 2016, 4, 77–91.
- 43M. Johari-Pireivatlou, ‘Effect of soil water stress on yield and proline content of four wheat lines’, Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 9, 36–40.
- 44M. Boroujerdnia, M. Bihamta, K. AlamiSaid, V. Abdossi, ‘Effect of drought tension on proline content, soluble carbohydrates, electrolytes leakage and relative water content of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)’, J. Plant Growth Physiol. 2016, 29, 23–41.
- 45V. H. Lokhande, T. D. Nikam, S. Penna, ‘Biochemical, physiological and growth changes in response to salinity in callus cultures of Sesuvium portulacastrum L.’, Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2010, 102, 17–25.
- 46M. Afsharmohammdian, F. Ghanati, S. Ahmadiani, K. Sadrzamani, ‘Effect of drought stress on the activity of antioxidant enzymes and soluble sugars content of pennyroyal (Mentha pulegium L.)’, Nova Biol. Rep. 2016, 3, 228–237.
10.21859/acadpub.nbr.3.3.228 Google Scholar
- 47D. I. Arnon, ‘Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenoxidase in beta vulgaris’, Plant Physiol. 1949, 24, 1–15.
- 48S. V. Ting, R. L. Rouseff, ‘Proline content in Florida frozen concentrated orange juice and canned grapefruit juice’, P. FLA. State Hort. 1979, 92, 143–145.
- 49D. M. Hodges, J. M. Delong, C. F. Forney, R. K. Prange, ‘Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds’, Planta 1999, 207, 604–611.
- 50H. S. Li, Q. Sun, S. J. Zhao, W. H. Zhang, ‘Principles and techniques of plant physiological biochemical experiment’, Higher Education, Beijing, 2000, 195–197.
- 51Y. Nakano, K. Asada, ‘Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts’, Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880.
- 52J. W. Mac Adam, C. J. Nelson, R. E. Sharp, ‘Peroxidase Activity in the leaf elongation zone of tall fescue’, Plant Physiol. 1992, 99, 872–878.
- 53A. Sarvin, A. P. Seregin, O. A. Shpigun, I. A. Rodin, A. N. Stavrianidi, ‘A novel strategy for isolation and determination of sugars and sugar alcohols from conifers’, J. Chromatogr. B 2018, 1092, 138–144.
- 54SAS Institute Inc. 2002, The SAS System for Windows, Release 9.0. Cary, NC, USA, Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.