Corporate sustainability, ecological modernization and the policy process in the South African automotive industry
Corresponding Author
Anderson Gwanyebit Kehbila
Department of Industrial Sustainability, Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus, Germany
Environmental and Resource Management Ph.D Program, Department of Industrial Sustainability, Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorJürgen Ertel
Department of Industrial Sustainability, Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAlan Colin Brent
Life Cycle Engineering, Department of Engineering and Technology Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Anderson Gwanyebit Kehbila
Department of Industrial Sustainability, Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus, Germany
Environmental and Resource Management Ph.D Program, Department of Industrial Sustainability, Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus, GermanySearch for more papers by this authorJürgen Ertel
Department of Industrial Sustainability, Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorAlan Colin Brent
Life Cycle Engineering, Department of Engineering and Technology Management, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In the past decade, the plea for corporate sustainability has gathered momentum and protecting the environment is one aspect for organizations to address if they are to conduct business in a sustainable manner. In this paper, we present the results of a questionnaire survey on the state of corporate sustainability within the South African automotive industry. The survey focused on the meaning and relevance of sustainability to South African automotive companies, and their use of different approaches to implement sustainability in corporate practice. On this score, the paper seeks to analyze and compare the levels of voluntary environmental initiatives between large and small and medium-sized enterprises within the automotive milieu. Survey results reveal that a majority of automotive companies have sought to improve their environmental performance by integrating environmental considerations into their core activities. Although the majority of these companies have standardized EMSs, our analysis reveals considerable differences between companies' approaches to corporate sustainability. In particular, they varied in the extent to which procedures were formalized and documented behind the corporate rhetoric of a high commitment to sustainability. The paper concludes by prescribing a number of recommendations as to how to engage and promote more widely the South African automobile manufacturing companies in environmental change. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
REFERENCES
- Alemagi D, Ertel J, Oben PM. 2005. A survey of environmental management systems initiatives in industries along the Atlantic Coast of Cameroon. Corporate Environmental Strategy: International Journal for Sustainable Business 12: 5–6.
-
Ammenberg J, Hjelm O, Quotes P. 2002. The connection between Environmental Management Systems and continual environmental performance improvements. Corporate Environmental Strategy 9(2): 183–192.
10.1016/S1066-7938(02)00011-8 Google Scholar
-
Ayuso S. 2006. Adoption of voluntary environmental tools for sustainable tourism: analysing the experience of Spanish hotels. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13: 207–220.
10.1002/csr.103 Google Scholar
- Bansal P, Bogner WC. 2002. Deciding on ISO 14001: economics, institutions, and context. Long Range Planning 35(3): 269–290.
- Belz FM, Schmidt-Riediger B. 2009. Marketing strategies in the age of sustainable development: evidence from the food industry. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.1002/bse.649
- Birkin F, Cashman AA, Koh SCL, Liu Z. 2007. New sustainable business models in China. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(1): 64–77.
- Brent AC, Labuschagne C. 2003. Evaluating environmental performances for supply chain management in the manufacturing industry. Business Strategy and the Environment Conference Proceedings, Leicester; 52–60.
-
Cockrean B. 2000. Success and failures: national guidance on ISO 14001 for New Zealand local authorities. In ISO 14001 Case Studies and Practical Experiences, R Hillary (ed.). Greenleaf: Sheffield; 39–49.
10.9774/GLEAF.978-1-909493-16-2_5 Google Scholar
- Collins E, Roper J, Lawrence S. 2009. Sustainability practices: trends in New Zealand businesses. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.1002/bse.653
- Del Brio J. 2000. Actitudes de las empresas industriales espanolas hacia el medio ambiente: factores de influencia, Ph.D Thesis, Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.
- Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT). 2002. Drivers of Environmental Change: Environmental Information and Reporting. www.environment.gov.za/soer/nsoer/drivers/index.htm [11 November 2006].
- Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). 2003. National Small Business Amendment Act. DTI: Pretoria.
-
Emilsson S, Hjelm O. 2002. Implementation of standardized environmental management systems in Swedish local authorities: reasons, expectations and some outcomes. Environmental Science and Policy 5: 443–448.
10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00090-4 Google Scholar
- Energy Information Administration (eia). 2004. South Africa: Energy and Environmental Issues. US Department of Energy. http://www.eia.doe.gov/cabs/safrenv.html [11 November 2006].
- Engineering News. 2002. Car maker's suppliers to be ISO 14001 accredited by 2005. www.engineeringnews.co.za/eng/sector/automotive/ [11 November 2006].
-
Evangelinos KI, Halkos GE. 2002. Implementation of environmental management systems standards: important factors in corporate decision making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 4: 311–328.
10.1142/S1464333202001030 Google Scholar
- Fraj-Andrés E, Martínez-Salinas E, Matute-Vallejo J. 2008. Factors affecting corporate environmental strategy in Spanish industrial firms. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.1002/bse.611
- Fowler FJ. 1993. Survey Research Methods, 2nd edn. Sage: Newbury Park, CA.
- Gavronski I, Ferrer G, Paiva EL. 2006. ISO 14001 certification in Brazil: motivations and benefits. Journal of Cleaner Production 16(1): 87–94.
- Goodchild E. 1998. The Business Benefits of EMS Approaches, PhD Dissertation, Salford: Salford University.
- Guerin TF. 2007. An assessment and ranking of barriers to doing environmental business with China. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(6): 380–396.
- Haddock-Fraser J, Fraser I. 2007. Assessing corporate environmental reporting motivations: differences between close-to-market and business-to-business companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15: 140–155.
-
Hahn T, Scheermesser M. 2006. Approaches to corporate sustainability among German companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13: 50–165.
10.1002/csr.100 Google Scholar
- Hillary R. 1997. Environmental Management Standards, what do SMEs think? In ISO 14001 and Beyond, C Sheldon (ed.). Greenleaf: Sheffield; 19–44.
- Hillary R. 1998. An Assessment of the Implementation Status of Council Regulation (No 1836/93) Eco-Management and Audit Scheme in the Member States (AIMS-EMAS). Imperial College: London.
- Hillary R. 2000. Small and medium sized enterprises and eco-management systems: barriers, opportunities and drivers. In CD Papers of the European Environmental Conference. World Business Council for Sustainable Development: Aalborg.
- Hillary R. 2004. Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. Journal of Cleaner Production 12(6): 561–569.
- Kehbila AG, Ertel J, Brent AC. 2009. Strategic corporate environmental management within the South African automotive industry: motivations, benefits hurdles. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 16(6): 310–323.
- KPMG Environmental Consulting. 1997. The Environmental Challenge and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Europe. The Hague: KPGM.
-
Küskü F. 2006. From necessity to responsibility: evidence for corporate environmental citizenship activities from a developing country perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 14: 74–84.
10.1002/csr.119 Google Scholar
- Labuschagne C, Brent AC, van Erck RPG. 2005. Assessing the sustainability performances of industries. Journal of Cleaner Production 13: 373–385.
- Melnyk SA, Sroufe RP, Calantone R. 2002. Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. Journal of Operations Management 21: 329–351.
- Mohammed M. 2000. The ISO 14001 EMS implementation process and its implications. A case study of central Japan. Eco-Management and Auditing 25: 177–188.
- Nakamura M, Takahashi T, Vertinsky I. 2001. Why Japanese firms choose to certify: a study of managerial responses to environmental issues. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 42(1): 23–52.
- National Association of Automobile Manufacturers of South Africa (NAAMSA). 2006. Annual Report. Balgair: Kwazulu Natal.
- National Association of Automotive Component and Allied Manufacturers (NAACAM). 2005. NAACAM 2005 Directory. http://www.naacam.co.za [10 April 2006].
- National Association of Local Authorities in Denmark (NALAD). 1997. Guide for the Promotion of Cleaner Technology and Responsible Entrepreneurship. NALAD: Copenhagen.
- Natural Resources Canada. 1998. From Mineral Resources to Manufactured Products: Toward a Value-Added Mineral and Metal Strategy for Canada. Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada: Ottawa.
-
Poksinska B, Dahlgaard J, Eklund J. 2003. Implementing ISO 14000 in Sweden: motives, benefits and comparisons with ISO 9000. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 20(5): 585–606.
10.1108/02656710310476543 Google Scholar
- Quazi HA, Khoo YK, Tan CM, Wong PS. 2001. Motivation for ISO 14000 certification: development of a predictive model. Omega. The International Journal of Management Science 29: 525–542.
-
Raines Summers S. 2002. Implementing ISO 14001 – An international survey assessing the benefits of certification. Corporate Environmental Strategy 9(4): 418–426.
10.1016/S1066-7938(02)00009-X Google Scholar
-
Revell A, Rutherfoord R. 2003. UK environmental policy and the small firm: broadening the focus. Business Strategy and the Environment 12: 26–35.
10.1002/bse.347 Google Scholar
- Revell A, Stokes D, Chen H. 2009. Small businesses and the environment: turning over a new leaf. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.1002/bse.628
-
Rondinelli D, Vastag G. 2000. Panacea, common sense, or just a label? – The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. European Management Journal 18(5): 499–510.
10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00039-6 Google Scholar
-
Rowe J, Hollingsworth D. 1996. Improving the environmental performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: a study in Avon. Eco-Management and Auditing 3: 97–107.
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0925(199607)3:2<97::AID-EMA42>3.0.CO;2-L Google Scholar
- Sá de Abreu MC. 2008. How to define an environmental policy to improve corporate sustainability in developing countries. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.1002/bse.625
- Sangle S. 2009. Empirical analysis of determinants of adoption of proactive environmental strategies in India. Business Strategy and the Environment. DOI: 10.1002/bse.651
- Seuring S. 2006. Supply chain controlling – summarizing recent developments in German literature. Supply Chain Management – an International Journal 11(1): 10–14.
- Smink CK, Nielsen EH, Jørgensen TH. 2006. Process and product-oriented environmental policy within the car chain – with examples from BMW and General Motors. In The Business of Sustainable Mobility, P Nieuwenhuis, P Vergragt, P Wells (eds). Greenleaf: Sheffield; 157–170.
- Sroufe R. 2003. Effects of Environmental Management Systems on environmental management practices and operations. Production and Operations Management 12(3): 416–431.
-
Strachan PA. 1999. Is EMAS regulation an effective strategic marketing tool for implementing industrial organizations? Eco-Management and Auditing 6: 42–51.
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0925(199903)6:1<42::AID-EMA88>3.0.CO;2-G Google Scholar
- Tan LP. 2004. Implementing ISO 14001: is it beneficial for firms in newly industrialized Malaysia? Journal of Cleaner Production 13(4): 397–404.
-
Teuscher P, Grüninger B, Ferdinand N. 2005. Risk management in sustainable supply chain management (SSCM): lessons learnt from the case of GMO-free soybeans. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 13: 1–10.
10.1002/csr.81 Google Scholar
- Turk AM. 2008. The benefits associated with ISO 14001 certification for construction firms: Turkish case. Journal of Cleaner Production 17(5): 559–569.
-
Turner CR, Ortmann GF, Lyne MC. 2000. Adoption of ISO 9000 quality assurance standards by South African agribusiness firms. Agribusiness 16(3): 295–307.
10.1002/1520-6297(200022)16:3<295::AID-AGR3>3.0.CO;2-P Google Scholar
- Vormedal I, Ruud A. 2006. Sustainability reporting in Norway – an assessment of performance in the context of legal demands and socio-political drivers. Business Strategy and the Environment 18(4): 207–222.
- Wahba H. 2007. Does the market value corporate environmental responsibility? An empirical examination. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15: 89–99.