Volume 8, Issue 8 pp. 922-927
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Activation of the rat olfactory bulb by direct ventral stimulation after nerve transection

Daniel H. Coelho MD, FACS

Corresponding Author

Daniel H. Coelho MD, FACS

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA

Correspondence to: Daniel H. Coelho, MD, FACS, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 3298-0146; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Leandro D. Socolovsky BS

Leandro D. Socolovsky BS

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA

Search for more papers by this author
Richard M. Costanzo PhD

Richard M. Costanzo PhD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 May 2018
Citations: 7

Funding source for the study: the Medarva Foundation.

Potential conflict of interest: None provided.

Presented at the American Rhinologic Society Spring Meeting at the COSM, April 21, 2018, in National Harbor, MD.

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to demonstrate how direct electrical stimulation can activate the olfactory bulb after denervation of the olfactory nerve input.

Methods

Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 5) were anesthetized and olfactory bulbs exposed. Olfactory nerves were transected by passing a Teflon blade between the cribriform plate and ventral surface of the bulb. A cochlear implant electrode array was used to stimulate 6 different positions along the ventral surface of the olfactory bulb. Biphasic constant-current pulses were used (50-1000 μA, 50–1000 μs) to stimulate the bulb, and a 16-electrode paddle array was used to record localized negative field potential responses at the dorsal surface of the bulb.

Results

Localized negative field potentials were reliably obtained using biphasic, 500-μA, 200-μs pulses. A shift in stimulating position by 1 mm resulted in a significant change in the dorsal field potential.

Conclusion

Direct stimulation of the deafferented olfactory bulb was effective in generating localized field potential responses. These findings support the potential use of direct electrical stimulation for the treatment of anosmia.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.