Volume 59, Issue 10 pp. 897-918
Research Article

Process evaluation of two participatory approaches: Implementing total worker health® interventions in a correctional workforce

Alicia G. Dugan PhD

Corresponding Author

Alicia G. Dugan PhD

Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut

Correspondence to: Alicia G. Dugan, PhD, Department of Medicine, UConn Health, 263 Farmington Ave, Farmington, CT 06030. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Dana A. Farr MA

Dana A. Farr MA

Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut

Search for more papers by this author
Sara Namazi MA

Sara Namazi MA

Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut

Search for more papers by this author
Robert A. Henning PhD

Robert A. Henning PhD

Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut

Search for more papers by this author
Kelly N. Wallace MS

Kelly N. Wallace MS

Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut

Search for more papers by this author
Mazen El Ghaziri PhD, MPH, BSN

Mazen El Ghaziri PhD, MPH, BSN

School of Nursing, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Laura Punnett ScD

Laura Punnett ScD

Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey L. Dussetschleger DDS, MPH

Jeffrey L. Dussetschleger DDS, MPH

Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut

Search for more papers by this author
Martin G. Cherniack MD, MPH

Martin G. Cherniack MD, MPH

Department of Medicine, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 July 2016
Citations: 28
Institution where work was performed: UConn Health.

Abstract

Background

Correctional Officers (COs) have among the highest injury rates and poorest health of all the public safety occupations. The HITEC-2 (Health Improvement Through Employee Control-2) study uses Participatory Action Research (PAR) to design and implement interventions to improve health and safety of COs.

Method

HITEC-2 compared two different types of participatory program, a CO-only “Design Team” (DT) and “Kaizen Event Teams” (KET) of COs and supervisors, to determine differences in implementation process and outcomes. The Program Evaluation Rating Sheet (PERS) was developed to document and evaluate program implementation.

Results

Both programs yielded successful and unsuccessful interventions, dependent upon team-, facility-, organizational, state-, facilitator-, and intervention-level factors.

Conclusions

PAR in corrections, and possibly other sectors, depends upon factors including participation, leadership, continuity and timing, resilience, and financial circumstances. The new PERS instrument may be useful in other sectors to assist in assessing intervention success. Am. J. Ind. Med. 59:897–918, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.