The Development of Expertise in Scientific Research
Special Areas of Interdisciplinary Study
Applications of Social Science Knowledge to Policy
Abstract
Scientific research is a fundamental mechanism for both advancing human knowledge about the natural world and facilitating technological innovations that fuel economic development. As such, understanding and optimizing the pathways to expertise and professional success in this endeavor is vital to ensure sustained intellectual and financial benefits of scientific research. This essay summarizes the research on the development of expertise in the sciences from the psychology of science and research on graduate education. Examining new research trends that present an emerging picture of a specific trajectory for the development of research skills and frame the development of scientific research skills as direct outcomes of specific training practices, new directions for research that bridge the cognitive and socialization lenses are identified.
References
- Anderson, W. A., Banerjee, U., Drennan, C. L., Elgin, S. C. R., Epstein, I. R., Handelsman, J. . . . Warner, I. M. (2011). Changing the culture of science education at research universities. Science , 331 , 153.
-
Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 397–456). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
10.1007/1-4020-4512-3_8 Google Scholar
- Bauer, H. H. (1992). Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
- Bianchini, J. A., Whitney, D. J., Breton, T. D., & Hilton-Brown, B. A. (2001). Toward inclusive science education: University scientists' views of students, instructional practices, and the nature of science. Science Education, 86, 42–78.
- Cheng, P., & Simon, H. A. (1995). Scientific discovery and creative reasoning with diagrams. In S. Smith, T. Ward & R. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Christensen, B. T., & Schunn, C. C. (2009). The role and impact of mental simulation in design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 327–344.
- Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6, 38–46.
- Delamont, S., & Atkinson, P. (2001). Doctoring uncertainty: Mastering craft knowledge. Social Studies of Science, 31, 87–107.
- Feldon, D. F., Maher, M. A., Hurst, M., & Timmerman, B. (2015). Faculty mentors', graduate students', and performance-based assessments of students' research skill development. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 334–370.
- Feldon, D. F., Maher, M., Roksa, J., & Peugh, J. (2016). Cumulative advantage in the skill development of STEM graduate students: A mixed methods study. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 132–161.
- Feldon, D. F., Maher, M., & Timmerman, B. (2010). Performance-based data in the study of STEM graduate education. Science, 329, 282–283.
- Feldon, D. F., Peugh, J., Timmerman, B. E., Maher, M. A., Hurst, M., Strickland, D., . . . Stiegelmeyer, C. (2011). Graduate students' teaching experiences improve their methodological research skills. Science , 333(6045), 1037–1039.
-
Feldon, D. F., Shukla, K., & Maher, M. A. (2016). Faculty–student coauthorship as a means to enhance STEM graduate students' research skills. International Journal of Researcher Development.
10.1108/IJRD-10-2015-0027 Google Scholar
-
Frodeman, R., & Mitcham, C. (2007). New directions in interdisciplinarity: Broad, deep, and critical. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 27, 506–514.
10.1177/0270467607308284 Google Scholar
- Gardner, S. K. (2010). Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high- and low-completing departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 81, 61–81.
- Gilmore, J. A., Vieyra, M., Timmerman, B. E., Feldon, D. F., & Maher, M. A. (2015). The relationship between undergraduate research participation and subsequent research performance of early career STEM graduate students. The Journal of Higher Education, 86, 834–863.
- Golde, C. M., Conklin Bueschel, A., Jones, L., & Walker, G. E. (2009). Advocating apprenticeship and intellectual community: Lessons from the Carnegie initiative on the doctorate. In R. G. Ehrenberg & C. V. Kuh (Eds.), Doctoral education and faculty of the future (pp. 53–64). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Golde, C. M., & Dore, T. M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trusts. www.phd-survey.org.
- Green, S., & Bauer, T. (1995). Supervisory mentoring by advisers: Relationships with doctoral student potential, productivity, and commitment. Personnel Psychology, 48, 537–562.
- Holley, K. (2009). Animal research practices and doctoral student identity development in a scientific community. Studies in Higher Education, 34, 577–591.
- Johnson, L., Lee, A., & Green, B. (2000). The Ph.D. and the autonomous self: Gender, rationality, and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 25, 135–147.
- Kademani, B. S., Kalyane, V. L., Kumar, V., & Mohan, L. (2005). Nobel laureates: Their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status. Scientometrics, 62, 261–268.
- Kamler, B. (2008). Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 284–294.
- Kardash, C. (2000). Evaluation of undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and the faculty mentors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 191–201.
- Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 431–441.
- Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. J. (2009). Student–faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50, 437–459.
- Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1–55.
- Klahr, D., & Simon, H. A. (2001). What have psychologists (and others) discovered about the process of scientific discovery? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 75–79.
- Knorr-Cetina, K. (1997). What scientists do. In T. Ibáñez & L. Íñiguez (Eds.), Critical social psychology. London, England: Sage Publications.
- Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Lattuca, L. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinarity: Interdisciplinary research and teaching among college and university faculty. New York, NY: Vanderbilt University Press.
- Lovitts, B. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Lovitts, B. E. (2007). Making the implicit explicit: Creating performance expectations for the dissertation. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
- Maher, M. A., Gilmore, J. A., Feldon, D. F., & Davis, T. E. (2013). Cognitive apprenticeship and the supervision of science and engineering research assistants. Journal of Research Practice, 9(2, Article M5).
- Nersessian, N. J., & Chandrasekharan, S. (2009). Hybrid analogies in conceptual innovation in science. Cognitive Systems Research, 10, 178–188.
- Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Paglis, L., Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47, 451–476.
- Pearson, M., & Brew, A. (2002). Research training and supervision development. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 135–150.
- Rhoten, D. (2004). Interdisciplinary research: Trend or transition. Items & Issues (Social Science Research Council), 5, 6–11.
- Schraagen, J. (1993). How experts solve a novel problem in experimental design. Cognitive Science, 17, 285–305.
- Timmerman, B., Feldon, D. F., Maher, M., Strickland, D., & Gilmore, J. A. (2013). Performance-based assessment of graduate student research skills: Timing, trajectory, and potential thresholds. Studies in Higher Education, 38, 693–710.
-
Vanstone, M., Hibbert, K., Kinsella, E. A., McKenzie, P., Lingard, L., Pitman, A., & Wilson, T. (2013). Interdisciplinary doctoral research supervision: A scoping review. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43(2), 42–67.
10.47678/cjhe.v43i2.2403 Google Scholar
- Weidman, J. C. (2010). Doctoral student socialization for research. In S. K. Gardner & P. Mendoza (Eds.), On becoming a scholar: Socialization and development in doctoral education (pp. 29–44). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing Inc.
Citing Literature
Browse other articles of this reference work:
