Group Identity and Political Cohesion
Leonie Huddy
State University of New York Stonybrook, Stonybrook, New York, USA
Search for more papers by this authorLeonie Huddy
State University of New York Stonybrook, Stonybrook, New York, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This entry examines the conditions under which group identities become politicized, the psychology underlying this process, and the consequences of political identities for political cohesion and engagement. The political consequences of membership in various demographic and religious groups played a central role in the earliest voting studies and these findings have been theoretically and empirically enriched by an active research focus on social identities within social psychology. Foundational research has identified the underpinnings of cohesive group political behavior in the existence of chronic strong group identities, an established link between the group and politics, and the emergence of group norms fostering a distinct political outlook and political action. Recent research has focused on dynamic aspects of group political cohesion, including threats to the group's status, the convergence of distinct identities, and factors that arouse strong emotions likely to foster collective action. Numerous questions remain unanswered about the conditions under which group political cohesion emerges. One set of questions concerns the origins of chronically strong identities in personality factors such as agreeableness and extraversion. Another set of questions touches on the origins of group identity in situational contexts that promote uncertainty. Finally, the degree to which group leaders can elicit cohesion and conformity, and the situational elements that promote such influence, is a very promising avenue for future research.
References
- Abrams, D. (1994). Political distinctiveness: An identity optimising approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 357–365.
- Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perception. Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–150.
- Bettencourt, B. A., Dorr, N., Charlton, K., & Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 520–542.
- Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36, 1–28.
- Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal inter-group situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.
- Bullock, J. G. (2011). Elite influence on public opinion in an informed electorate. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 496–515.
- Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Bourguignon, D., & Seron, E. (2002). Who may enter? The impact of in-group identification on in-group/out-group categorization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 315–322.
-
Chong, D. (2013). Degrees of rationality in politics. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology ( 2nd ed., pp. 96–129). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.013.0004 Google Scholar
- Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637–655. doi:10.1017/S0003055407070554
- Conejero, S., & Etxebarria, I. (2007). The impact of the Madrid bombing on personal emotions, emotional atmosphere and emotional climate. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 273–287.
- Dawes, C. T., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Partisanship, voting, and the dopamine D2 receptor gene. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1157–1171.
- Fowler, J. H., & Kam, C. D. (2008). Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation. The Journal of Politics, 69(3), 813–827.
- Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2012). Personality and the strength and direction of partisan identification. Political Behavior, 34(4), 653–688.
- Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeded, M., & Kirkland, S. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural world view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308–318.
- Grieve, P. G., & Hogg, M. A. (1999). Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal intergroup situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 926–940.
- Haslam, A. S., & Reicher, S. (2006). Stressing the group: Social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1037–1052.
- Hogg, M. A. (2007). Uncertainty-identity theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 69–126.
- Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social Identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16, 7–30.
- Hohman, Z. P., Hogg, M. A., & Bligh, M. C. (2010). Identity and intergroup leadership: Asymmetrical political and national identification in response to uncertainty. Self and Identity, 9, 113–128.
-
Huddy, L. (2013). From group identity to political cohesion and commitment. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology ( 2nd ed., pp. 737–773). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Huddy, L. (2001). From social to political identity: A critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychology, 22, 127–156.
-
Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Cassese, E. (2007). On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger. In W. Russell Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. Crigler & M. MacKuen (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior (pp. 202–230). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226574431.003.0009 Google Scholar
- Huddy, L., Mason, L., & Aaroe, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review. 109(1) doi:10.1017/S0003055414000604
- Klandermans, B., & van Stekelenburg, J. (2013). Social movements and the dynamics of collective action. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology ( 2nd ed., pp. 774–811). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Lambert, A. J., Scherer, L. D., Schott, J. P., Olson, K. R., Andrews, R. K., O'Brien, T. C., & Zisser, A. R. (2010). Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: An integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 886–903.
- Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14, 144–150.
- Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616.
- Mason, L. (2015). “I Disrespectfully Disagree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science Research, 59(1), 128–145.
-
Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., & Greenberg, J. (2003). In the wake of 9/11: The psychology of terror
. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.1037/10478-000 Google Scholar
- Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88–106.
- Rydell, R. J., Mackie, D. J., Maitner, A. T., Claypool, H. M., Ryan, M. J., & Smith, E. R. (2008). Arousal, processind, and risk-taking: Consequences of intergroup anger. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1141–1152.
- Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2005). When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 192–200.
- Schildkraut, D. J. (2002). The more things change… American identity and mass and elite responses to 9/11. Political Psychology, 23(3), 511–535.
- Schmid, K., Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Hughes, J., & Cairns, E. (2008). The effects of living in segregated vs. mixed areas in Northern Ireland: A simultaneous analysis of contact and threat effects in the context of micro-level neighborhoods. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 2, 56–71.
- Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J., Cirns, E., & Christ, O. (2007). Cross-community contact, perceived status differences, and intergroup attitudes in Northern Ireland: The mediating roles of individual-level versus group-level the threats and the moderating role of social identification. Political Psychology, 28(1), 53–68.
- Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
- van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: Quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–535.
- Voci, A. (2006). The link between identification and in-group favouritism: Effects of threat to social identity and trust-related emotions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 265–284.
- Zaller, J. R. (1992). Nature and nature of mass ideology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Citing Literature
Browse other articles of this reference work: