Textbooks
Josep Simon
Search for more papers by this authorJosep Simon
Search for more papers by this authorBernard Lightman
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Textbooks have traditionally been standard sources in the history of science. But they have remained marginal in the formulation of large historiographical questions. They are commonly used as a resourceful tool for their collective multiplicity, but they are more rarely considered in their individuality. They have been valued for their capacity of reflecting knowledge, but seldom for their agency in transforming it. The low status of textbooks in comparison to other genres of science is connected to knowledge hierarchies that are historically contingent. This chapter argues for a greater reflexivity leading to the acknowledgement of textbooks as major sources for historiographical development in history of science. It stresses their value to address questions which are central to scientific practice, and their global potential to connect research in local, national, international and transnational perspective. The chapter provides an introduction to science textbook studies and proposes new avenues for future research.
References
- Bachelard, Gaston. 2002[1938]. The Formation of the Scientific Mind: A Contribution to a Psychoanalysis of Objective Knowledge. Manchester: Clinamen Press.
- Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette, Antonio García-Belmar, and José Ramón Bertomeu. 2003. L'émergence d'une science des manuels: les livres de chimie en France (1789–1852). Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaines.
- Bertomeu, José Ramón, Antonio García-Belmar, Anders Lundgren, and Manolis Patiniotis (eds.) 2006. “Textbooks in the scientific periphery.” Science and Education, 15: 657–880.
10.1007/s11191-004-7444-1 Google Scholar
- Blair, Ann. 2008. “ Student manuscripts and the textbook.” In Scholarly Knowledge: Textbooks in Early Modern Europe, edited by Emidio Campi, Simone De Angelis, Anja-Sylvia Goeing, and Anthony Grafton, 39–73. Geneva: Librairie Droz.
- Blondel-Mégrelis, Marika. 2000. “ Berzelius's textbook: In translation and multiple editions, as seen through his correspondence.” In Communicating Chemistry: Textbooks and Their Audiences, 1789–1939, edited by Anders Lundgren and Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent, 233–54. Canton: Science History Publications.
- Brush, Stephen G. 1976. The Kind of Motion We Call Heat: A History of the Kinetic Theory of Gases in the 19th Century. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
- Brush, Stephen G. 2002. “How theories became knowledge: Morgan's chromosome theory of heredity in America and Britain.” Journal of the History of Biology, 35: 471–535.
- Choppin, Alain. 1992. Les manuels scolaires: histoire et actualité. Paris: Hachette.
- Collins, Harry and Robert Evans. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226113623.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Fleck, Ludwik. 1979[1935]. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Fyfe, Aileen. 2002. “Publishing and the classics: Paley's Natural Theology and the nineteenth-century scientific canon.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 33: 729–51.
- García-Belmar, Antonio. 2006. “ The didactic uses of experiment: Louis Jacques Thenard's lectures at the Collège de France.” In Science, Medicine and Crime: Mateu Orfila (1787–1853) and His Times, edited by José Ramón Bertomeu and Agustí Nieto-Galan, 25–53. Canton: Watson Publishing.
- García-Belmar, Antonio, José Ramón Bertomeu, and Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent. 2005. “ The power of didactic writings: French chemistry textbooks of the nineteenth century.” In Pedagogy and the Practice of Science. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by David Kaiser, 219–51. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Gingerich, Owen. 1988. “Sacrobosco as a textbook.” Journal for the History of Astronomy, 19: 269–73.
10.1177/002182868801900404 Google Scholar
- Gingerich, Owen. 2004. The Book Nobody Read: Chasing the Revolutions of Nicolaus Copernicus. New York: Walker.
- Gordin, Michael. D. 2012. “Translating textbooks: Russian, German, and the language of chemistry.” Isis, 103: 88–98.
- Hannaway, Owen. 1975. The Chemists and the Word: The Didactic Origins of Chemistry. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
- Haupt, Bettina. 1987. Deutschsprachige Chemielehrbücher (1775–1850). Stuttgart: Deutscher Apotheker Verlag.
- Holmes, Frederic L. 1987. “Scientific writing and scientific discovery.” Isis, 78: 220–35.
- Holmes, Frederic L. 1989. “The complementarity of teaching and research in Liebig's Laboratory.” Osiris, 5: 121-64.
- Hopwood, Nick. 2015. Haeckel's Embryos: Images, Evolution, and Fraud. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226047133.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Kaiser, David. 2005a. Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226422657.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Kaiser, David. 2005b. “Training and the generalist's vision in the history of science.” Isis, 96: 244–51.
- Kaiser, David. 2007. “Turning physicists into quantum mechanics.” Physics World, 20(May): 28–33.
- Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory. 2010. Teaching Children Science: Hands-On Nature Study in North America, 1890–1930. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226449920.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Kuhn, Thomas S. 1963. “ The function of dogma in scientific research.” In Scientific Change, edited by A. C. Crombie, 347–69. New York: Basic Books.
- Ladouceur, Ronald P. 2008. “Ella Thea Smith and the lost history of American high school biology textbooks.” Journal of the History of Biology, 41: 435–71.
- Lind, Gunter. 1992. Physik im Lehrbuch, 1700–1850. Zur Geschichte der Physik und ihrer Didaktik in Deutschland. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
- Lundgren, Anders and Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent (eds.) 2000. Communicating Chemistry: Textbooks and Their Audiences, 1789–1939. Canton: Science History Publications.
- Mollier, Jean-Yves. 1988. L'argent et les lettres: histoire du capitalisme d'edition, 1880–1920. Paris: Fayard.
- Myers, Greg. 1990. Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
- Nelkin, Dorothy. 1977. Science Textbook Controversies and the Politics of Equal Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Olesko, Kathryn M. 1993. “Tacit knowledge and school formation.” Osiris, 8: 16–29
- Olesko, Kathryn M. 2005. “ The foundations of a canon: Kohlrausch's Practical Physics.” In Pedagogy and the Practice of Science. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by David Kaiser, 323–55. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Olesko, Kathryn M. 2006. “Science pedagogy as a category of historical analysis: Past, present, and future.” Science and Education, 15: 863–80.
10.1007/s11191-005-2014-8 Google Scholar
- Olesko, Kathryn M. 2014. “ Science education in the historical study of the sciences.” In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, edited by Michael R. Matthews, 1965–90. Amsterdam: Springer Verlag.
- Park, Hyung Wook. 2008. “Edmund Vincent Cowdry and the making of gerontology as a multidisciplinary scientific field in the United States.” Journal of the History of Biology, 41: 529–72.
- Roldán Vera, Eugenia. 2003. The British Book Trade and Spanish American Independence: Education and Knowledge Transmission in Transcontinental Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Rudolph, John L. 2002. Scientists in the Classroom: The Cold War Reconstruction of American Science Education. New York: Palgrave.
10.1057/9780230107366 Google Scholar
- Rudolph, John L. 2008. “Historical writing on science education: A view of the landscape.” Studies in Science Education, 44: 63–82.
- Sarton, George. 1948. “The study of early scientific textbooks.” Isis, 38: 137–48.
- Secord, James A. 2000. Victorian Sensation: The Extraordinary Publication, Reception, and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226158259.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Secord, James A. 2004. “Knowledge in transit.” Isis, 95: 654–72.
- Secord, James A. 2007. “Science.” Journal of Victorian Culture, 12: 272–6.
10.1353/jvc.2007.0048 Google Scholar
- Shapiro, Adam R. 2013. Trying Biology: The Scopes Trial, Textbooks, and the Antievolution Movement in American Schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226029597.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Simon, Josep. 2009. “ Circumventing the ‘elusive quarries’ of popular science: The communication and appropriation of Ganot's physics in nineteenth-century Britain.” In Popularizing Science and Technology in the European Periphery, 1800–2000, edited by Faidra Papanelopoulou, Agustí Nieto-Galan, and Enrique Perdiguero, 89–114. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Simon, Josep. 2011. Communicating Physics: The Production, Circulation and Appropriation of Ganot's Textbooks in France and England, 1851–1887. London: Pickering & Chatto.
- Simon, Josep. 2012. “Cross-national education and the making of science, technology and medicine.” History of Science, 50: 251–6.
- Simon, Josep. 2013a. “ Physics textbooks and textbook physics in the nineteenth and twentieth century.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of Physics, edited by Jed Buchwald and Robert Fox, 651–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Simon, Josep (ed.) 2013b. “Cross-national and comparative history of science education.” Science & Education, 22: 763–866.
- Simon, Josep. 2015. “ History of science.” In Encyclopedia of Science Education, edited by Richard Gunstone, 456–9. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
- Simon, Josep and Néstor Herran. 2008. “ Introduction.” In Beyond Borders: Fresh Perspectives in History of Science, edited by Josep Simon and Néstor Herran, 1–23. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Skopek, Jeffrey M. 2011. “Principles, exemplars, and uses of history in early 20th century genetics.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 42: 210–25.
- Topham, Jonathan. 1992. “Science and popular education in the 1830s: The role of the Bridgewater treatises.” British Journal for the History of Science, 25: 397–430.
- Topham, Jonathan. 2000. “Scientific publishing and the reading of science in nineteenth-century Britain: A historiographical survey and guide to sources.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 31: 559–612.
- Topham, Jonathan. 2011. “ Science, print, and crossing borders: Importing French science books into Britain, 1789–1815.” In Geographies of Nineteenth Century Science, edited by David N. Livingstone and Charles W. J. Withers, 311–44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226487298.003.0013 Google Scholar
- Warwick, Andrew. 2003a. Masters of Theory: Cambridge and the Rise of Mathematical Physics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226873763.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Warwick, Andrew. 2003b. “ ‘A very hard nut to crack’ or making sense of Maxwell's treatise on electricity and magnetism in mid-Victorian Cambridge.” In Scientific Authorship: Credit and Intellectual Property in Science, edited by Mario Biagioli and Peter Galison, 133–61. New York: Routledge.
- Warwick, Andrew and David Kaiser. 2005. “ Conclusion: Kuhn, Foucault, and the power of pedagogy.” In Pedagogy and the Practice of Science. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by David Kaiser, 393–409. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Whitley, Richard. 1985. “ Knowledge producers and knowledge acquirers: Popularisation as a relation between scientific fields and their publics.” In Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation, edited by Terry Shinn and Richard Whitley, 3–30. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.