Chapter 12
The Professional Scientist
Cyrus C. M. Mody,
Cyrus C. M. Mody
Search for more papers by this authorCyrus C. M. Mody,
Cyrus C. M. Mody
Search for more papers by this authorBook Editor(s):Bernard Lightman,
Bernard Lightman
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Professional science as a largely middle class occupation emerged in the nineteenth century and expanded dramatically in the twentieth. Scientists' growing administrative duties, in particular, afforded middle class status, but also worked to marginalize women and, often, ethnosectarian minorities. Scientists' technical expertise made them valuable but also troublesome to states and other patrons. Divisions within their professional communities encouraged scientists to carry their arguments into the public sphere. This “unbounding” has blurred the lines between professional science and its pretenders, but has also made science more responsive to its environment.
References
- Abbate, Janet. 2012. Recoding Gender: Women's Changing Participation in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9014.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Abir-Am, Pnina, and Dorinda Outram (eds.) 1987. Intimate Lives: Women in Science, 1789–1979. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
- Anderson, Warwick, and Hans Pols. 2012. “Scientific patriotism: Medical science and national self-fashioning in southeast Asia.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 54: 93–113.
- Barley, Stephen R., and Julian E. Orr (eds.) 1997. Between Craft and Science: Technical Work in U.S. Settings. Ithaca, NY: IRL Press.
- Bassett, Ross. 2009a. “MIT-trained Swadeshis: MIT and Indian nationalism, 1880–1947.” Osiris, 24: 212–30.
10.1086/605976 Google Scholar
- Bassett, Ross. 2009b. “Aligning India in the Cold War era: Indian technical elites, the Indian Institute of Technology at Kanpur, and computing in India and the United States.” Technology and Culture, 50: 783–801.
- Berman, Elizabeth Popp. 2012. Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic Engine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400840472 Google Scholar
- Bound, John, Sarah Turner, and Patrick Walsh. 2009. “ Internationalization of U.S. doctorate education.” In Science and Engineering Careers in the United States: An Analysis of Markets and Employment, edited by Richard B. Freeman and Daniel L. Goroff, 59–98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226261904.003.0003 Google Scholar
- Chakrabarti, Pratik. 2009. “‘Signs of the times:’ Medicine and nationhood in British India.” Osiris, 24: 188–211.
- Collins, H.M. 2004. Gravity's Shadow: The Search for Gravitational Waves. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226113791.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Conant, Jennet. 2002. Tuxedo Park: A Wall Street Tycoon and the Secret Palace of Science that Changed the Course of World War II. New York: Simon & Schuster.
- Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
- Ensmenger, Nathan. 2010. The Computer Boys Take Over: Computers, Programmers, and the Politics of Technical Expertise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Forman, Paul. 1987. “Behind quantum electronics: National Security as basis for physical research in the United States, 1940–1960.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 18: 149–229.
10.2307/27757599 Google Scholar
- Forman, Paul. 2007. “The primacy of science in modernity, of technology in postmodernity, and of ideology in the history of technology.” History and Technology, 23: 1–152
10.1080/07341510601092191 Google Scholar
- Galison, Peter, and Bruce Hevly (eds.) 1992. Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Galison, Peter. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Gertner, Jon. 2012. The Idea Factory: Bell Labs and the Great Age of American Innovation. New York: Penguin.
- Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
- Gordin, Michael D. 2012. Pseudoscience Wars: Immanuel Velikovsky and the Birth of the Modern Fringe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226304434.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Hackett, Edward J. 1990. “Science as a vocation in the 1990s: The changing organizational culture of academic science.” Journal of Higher Education, 61: 241–79.
- Hall, Karl. 2008. “The schooling of Lev Landau: The European context of postrevolutionary Soviet theoretical physics.” Osiris, 23: 230–59.
- Hamblin, Jacob Darwin. 2013. Arming Mother Nature: The Birth of Catastrophic Environmentalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Harding, Sandra. 1993. The “Racial” Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
- Headrick, Daniel R. 1988. The Tentacles of Progress: Technology Transfer in the Age of Colonialism. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Herzig, Rebecca M. 2005. Suffering for Science: Reason and Sacrifice in Modern America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
10.2307/j.ctt5hjd9p Google Scholar
- Hoddeson, Lillian, Adrienne W. Kolb, and Catherine Westfall. 2008. Fermilab: Physics, the Frontier, and Megascience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226346250.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Hoddeson, Lillian. 1981. “The emergence of basic research in the Bell Telephone System, 1875–1915.” Technology and Culture, 22: 512–44.
- Hounshell, David A., and John Kenly Smith. 1988. Science and Corporate Strategy: Du Pont R&D 1902–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hughes, Jeff A. 2002. The Manhattan Project: Big Science and the Atom Bomb. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Hughes, Thomas P. 1989. American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm, 1870–1970. New York: Viking.
- Hui, Alexandra. 2013. The Psychophysical Ear: Musical Experiments, Experimental Sounds, 1840–1910. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Ito, Kenji. 2005. “ The Geist in the institute: The production of quantum physicists in 1930s Japan.” In Pedagogy and the Practice of Science: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, edited by David Kaiser, 151–84. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Jasanoff, Sheila, and Sang-Hyun Kim. 2013. “Sociotechnical imaginaries and national energy policies.” Science as Culture, 22: 189–96.
- Johnson, Jeffrey A. 1985. “Academic chemistry in Imperial Germany.” Isis, 76: 500–524.
- Jones, Mark Peter. 2009. “Entrepreneurial science: The rules of the game.” Social Studies of Science, 39: 821–51.
- Josephson, Paul R. 1991. Physics and Politics in Revolutionary Russia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Kaiser, David. 2004. “The postwar suburbanization of American physics.” American Quarterly, 56: 851–88.
- Kaiser, David. 2005. “The atomic secret in Red hands? American suspicions of theoretical physicists during the early Cold War.” Representations, 90: 28–60.
10.1525/rep.2005.90.1.28 Google Scholar
- Kevles, Daniel J. 1997. “Big science and big politics in the United States: Reflections on the death of the SSC and the life of the Human Genome Project.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, 27: 269–97.
- Kline, Ronald R. 1995. “Construing ‘technology’ as ‘applied science:’ Public rhetoric of scientists and engineers in the United States, 1880–1945.” Isis, 86: 194–221.
- Kohler, Robert E. 1990. “The Ph.D. machine: Building on the collegiate base.” Isis, 81: 638–62.
10.1086/355543 Google Scholar
- Krige, John (ed.) 1996. History of CERN, vol. III. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
- Krige, John. 2006. American Hegemony and the Postwar Reconstruction of Science in Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/1230.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Leslie, Stuart W., and Robert Kargon. 2006. “Exporting MIT: Science, technology, and nation-building in India and Iran.” Osiris, 21: 110–30.
- McCray, W. Patrick. 2004. Giant Telescopes: Astronomical Ambition and the Promise of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Mirowski, Philip. 2011. Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/harvard.9780674061132 Google Scholar
- Moore, Kelly. 2008. Disrupting Science: Social Movements, American Scientists, and the Politics of the Military, 1945–1975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Murray, Fiona. 2010. “The oncomouse that roared: Hybrid exchange strategies as a source of distinction at the boundary of overlapping institutions.” American Journal of Sociology, 116: 341–88.
- Neff, Gina. 2012. Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9780262017480.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Nelson, Andrew J. 2015. The Sound of Innovation: Stanford and the Computer Music Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/10086.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Neushul, Peter, and Zuoyue Wang. 2000. “Between the devil and the deep blue sea: C. K Tseng, mariculture, and the politics of science in modern China.” Isis, 91: 59–88.
- Nordmann, Alfred, Hans Radder, and Gregor Schiemann (eds.) 2011. Science Transformed? Debating Claims of an Epochal Break. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Oreskes, Naomi and Erik M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. London: Bloomsbury Press.
- Owen-Smith, Jason, and Walter W. Powell. 2004. “Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community.” Organization Science, 15: 5–21.
- Pickering, Andrew. 2010. The Cybernetic Brain: Sketches of Another Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226667928.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Ploeger, Joanna S. 2002. “The art of science at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory: The rhetoric of aesthetics and humanism in the national laboratory system in the late 1960s.” History and Technology, 18: 23–49.
10.1080/07341510290028765 Google Scholar
- Pollock, Ethan. 2006. Stalin and the Soviet Science Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Prasad, Amit. 2014. Imperial Technoscience: Transnational Histories of MRI in the United States, Britain, and India. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9780262026956.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Proctor, Robert N., and Londa Schiebinger (eds.) 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Rabinow, Paul. 1996. Making PCR: A Story of Biotechnology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226216874.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Rau, Erik. 2005. “Combat science: The emergence of Operational Research in World War II.” Endeavour, 29: 156–61.
- Reardon, Jenny. 2005. Race to the Finish: Identity and Governance in the Age of Genomics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Reich, Eugenie Samuel. 2009. Plastic Fantastic: How the Biggest Fraud in Physics Shook the Scientific World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Reich, Leonard S. 1985. The Making of American Industrial Research: Science and Business at GE and Bell, 1876–1926. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Rossiter, Margaret. 1982. Women Scientists in America: Struggles and Strategies to 1940. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
10.56021/9780801824432 Google Scholar
- Sabin, Paul. 2013. The Bet: Paul Ehrlich, Julian Simon, and Our Gamble over Earth's Future. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Schaffer, Simon. 1988. “Astronomers mark time: Discipline and the personal equation.” Science in Context, 2: 115–45.
10.1017/S026988970000051X Google Scholar
- Shapin, Steven. 2008. The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226750170.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Sims, Benjamin. 2005. “Safe science: Material and social order in laboratory work.” Social Studies of Science, 35: 333–66.
- Slaton, Amy E. 2010. Race, Rigor, and Selectivity in U.S. Engineering: The History of an Occupational Color Line. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Smith Hughes, Sally. 2011. Genentech: The Beginnings of Biotech. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226359205.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Starr, Paul. 1982. The Social Transformation of American Medicine. New York: Basic Books.
- Thorpe, Charles. 2002. “Disciplining experts: Scientific Authority and liberal democracy in the Oppenheimer case.” Social Studies of Science, 32: 525–62.
- Turner, Fred. 2006. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Vettel, Eric James. 2006. Biotech: The Countercultural Origins of an Industry. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
10.9783/9780812203622 Google Scholar
- Vinsel, Lee Jared. 2012. “The crusade for credible energy information and analysis in the United States, 1973–1982.” History and Technology, 28: 149–76.
- Wang, Zuoyue. 2010. “Transnational science during the Cold War: The case of Chinese/American scientists.” Isis, 101: 367–77.
- Williams, Thomas R., and Michael Saladyga. 2011. Advancing Variable Star Astronomy: The Centennial History of the American Association of Variable Star Observers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511977251 Google Scholar
- Wise, George. 1985. Willis R. Whitney, General Electric, and the Origins of US Industrial Research. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Yruma, Jeris Stueland. 2008. “ How experiments are remembered: The discovery of nuclear fission, 1938–1968.” PhD dissertation, Princeton University.
- Zachary, G. Pascal. 1999. Endless Frontier: Vannevar Bush, Engineer of the American Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Zammito, John H. 2004. A Nice Derangement of Epistemes: Post-Positivism in the Study of Science from Quine to Latour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Ziman, John. 2000. Real Science: What It Is and What It Means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511541391 Google Scholar