Abstract
Mittelfeld (MF; literally, ‘mid-field’) is a handy, theory-neutral, descriptive term for addressing the non-peripheral portion of an OV-type clause, that is, a clause with a head-final VP. MF refers to what is in between the clause-initial C-position and the clause-final V-positions. MF phenomena are clause-internal phenomena since the left and the right boundaries belong to the same simple clause structure.
The MF core issues are (i) the serialization variation in the MF (scrambling) and (ii) the particular serialization options for pronouns at the beginning of the MF (in German) as a unique phenomenon that contrasts with scrambling of full DPs on the one hand and clitic placement on the other hand (in cliticizing languages).
MF phenomena are a challenge for the grammar theory (especially with respect to languages like German). Word order variation is optional, and descriptively, the syntactic behavior of MF elements is that of VP-internal elements. Mainstream grammar theory, however, models the MF of OV languages as a derivational continuation of a head-initial VP known from VO languages. Consequently, the MF is characterized as a derived head-final VP plus several functional layers above a basic head-initial VP and below C°. Movement (with hitherto unclear trigger conditions) is invoked for arriving at a head-final organization after starting from an English-like clause structure. However, central predictions of this approach are not fulfilled. The cumulative empirical evidence points into a different direction. Syntactic structures that successfully cover VO language structures do not straightforwardly cover OV. Head-final and head-initial structures seem to be alternative options, with collateral syntactic effects, that go well beyond mere serialization differences.
References
- Aoun, Joseph, and Yen-hui Audrey Li. 1993. Syntax of Scope. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Askedal, John Ole. 1986. “Über Stellungsfelder und Satztypen im Deutschen.” Deutsche Sprache, 1986 (3): 193–223.
- Bayer, Josef, and Jaklin Kornfilt. 1991. “ Against Scrambling as an Instance of Move-Alpha.” Proceedings of the 21st NELS-Conference, Montreal 1990, 1–15.
- Bech, Gunnar. 1955. Studien über das deutsche verbum infinitum. Copenhagen: Munksgaard. (Second, unchanged edition (1983), edited by Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.)
- Besten, Hans den, and Jan Rutten. 1989. “ On Verb Raising, Extraposition, and Free Word Order in Dutch.” In Sentential Complementation and the Lexicon, edited by Dany Jaspers, Wim G. Klooster, Yvan Putseys, and Pieter A. M. Seuren, 41–56. Dordrecht: Foris.
- Besten, Hans den, and G. Webelhuth. 1990. “ Stranding.” In Scrambling and Barriers, edited by Günther Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 77–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Bošković, Željko, and Daiko Takahashi. 1998. “Scrambling and Last Resort.” Linguistic Inquiry, 29: 347–366.
- Büring, Daniel. 2003. “On D-Trees, Beans, and B-Accents.” Linguistics and Philosophy, 26: 511–545.
- Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Collins, Chris, and Höskuldur Thráinsson. 1996. “VP-Internal Structure and Object Shift in Icelandic.” Linguistic Inquiry, 27: 391–444.
- Corver, Norbert F., and Henk van Riemsdijk. 1997. “ The Position of the Head and the Domain of Scrambling.” In Typology: Prototypes, Item Orderings and Universals, edited by Bohumil Palek, 57–90. Prague: Karolinum Press.
- Culicover, Peter W., and Michael S. Rochemont. 1990. “Extraposition and the Complement Principle.” Linguistic Inquiry, 21: 23–47.
- Dehé, Nicole. 2004. “On the Order of Objects in Icelandic Double Object Constructions.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 16: 85–108.
-
Deprez, Viviane. 1994. “ Parameters of Object Movement.” In Studies on Scrambling, edited by Norbert Corver and Henk Riemsdijk, 101–152. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10.1515/9783110857214.101 Google Scholar
- Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Dikken, Marcel den. 1996. “ The Minimal Links of Verb (Projection) Raising.” In Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, edited by Werner Abraham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson, and Jan-Wouter Zwart, 67–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Emonds, Joseph. 1991. “Subcategorization and Syntax-Based Theta-Role Assignment.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9: 369–429.
-
Fanselow, Gisbert. 1990. “ Scrambling as NP-Movement.” In Scrambling and Barriers, edited by Günther Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 113–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.1075/la.5.07fan Google Scholar
- Fanselow, Gisbert. 1993. “Die Rückkehr der Basisgenerierer.” Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik, 36: 1–74.
- Fanselow, Gisbert. 2001. “Features, Theta-Roles, and Free Constituent Order.” Linguistic Inquiry, 32: 405–37.
- Fanselow, Gisbert. 2003. “Free Constituent Order: A Minimalist Interface Account.” Folia Linguistica, 37: 191–231.
-
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2012. “ Scrambling as Formal Movement.” In Contrasts and Positions in Information Structure, edited by Ivona Kučerová and Ad Neeleman, 267–295. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511740084.013 Google Scholar
- Frey, Werner. 1993. Syntaktische Bedingungen für die Interpretation. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
- Frey, Werner, and Karin Pittner. 1998. “Zur Positionierung von Adverbien.” Linguistische Berichte, 176: 489–534.
- Geerts, Guido, W. Haeseryn, J. de Rooij, and M. C. van den Toorn. 1984. Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
- Grewendorf, Günther. 1989. “ Small Pro in German.” In Scrambling and Barriers, edited by Günther Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 294–315. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Grewendorf, Günther, and Joachim Sabel. 1994. “Long Scrambling and Incorporation.” Linguistic Inquiry, 25: 263–308.
- Grewendorf, Günther, and Joachim Sabel. 1999. “Scrambling in German and Japanese: Adjunction versus Multiple Specifiers.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17 (1): 1–65.
-
Grewendorf, Günther, and Wolfgang Sternefeld. 1990. “ Scrambling Theories.” In Scrambling and Barriers, edited by Günther Grewendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld, 3–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.1075/la.5.02gre Google Scholar
- Haegeman, Liliane. 1992. Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study in West Flemish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Haider, Hubert. 1984. “ The Case of German.” In Studies in German Grammar, edited by J. Toman, 65–101. Dordrecht: Foris.
- Haider, Hubert. 1989. “ Theta-Tracking Systems: Evidence from German.” In Configurationality: The Typology of Asymmetries, edited by László Marácz and Pieter Muysken, 185–206. Dordrecht: Foris.
-
Haider, Hubert. 1990. “ Null Subjects and Expletives in Romance and Germanic Languages.” In Issues in Germanic Syntax, edited by Abraham Werner, W. Kosmeijer, and E. Reuland, 49–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10.1515/9783110847277.49 Google Scholar
- Haider, Hubert. 1991. “ Argument Structure: Semantic Basis and Syntactic Effects.” Lecture notes, distributed by the Third European Summer School in Language, Logic and Information. University of Saarbrücken.
- Haider, Hubert. 1992/2000. “ Branching and Discharge.” In Lexical Specification and Insertion, edited by Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert, and Jane Grimshaw, 135–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Haider, Hubert. 1993. Deutsche Syntax, Generativ. Tübingen: Narr.
- Haider, Hubert. 1997a. “ Typological Implications of a Directionality Constraint on Projections.” In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation, edited by Artemis Alexiadou and T. A. Hall, 17–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Haider, Hubert. 1997b. “ Scrambling – Locality, Economy, and Directionality.” In Scrambling, edited by S. Tonoike, 61–91. Tokyo: Kurioso.
-
Haider, Hubert. 1997c. “Precedence among Predicates.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 1: 3–41.
10.1023/A:1009713319586 Google Scholar
- Haider, Hubert. 2001. “ Prosodic Signals for Reconstructing the Basic Item Order: On the Interplay between Structure and Prosody.” In Item Order: Its Variety and Linguistic and Phonetic Consequences: Proceedings of LP’2000, edited by B. Palek and O. Fujimura, 347–366. Prague: Karolinum Press.
-
Haider, Hubert. 2010. The Syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
10.1017/CBO9780511845314 Google Scholar
- Haider, Hubert. 2013. Symmetry Breaking in Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Haider, Hubert, and Inger Rosengren. 1998. Scrambling. Lund: Centre for Languages and Literature, University of Lund.
-
Haider, Hubert, and Inger Rosengren. 2003. “Scrambling: Non Triggered Chain Formation in OV Languages.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 15 (3): 203–267.
10.1017/S1470542703000291 Google Scholar
- Haider, Hubert, and Luka Szucsich. In press. “ Scrambling and V-Positioning in Slavic Languages: Exceptionally VO or Regular T3?” In The German Middle Field in a Comparative and Diachronic Perspective, edited by Roland Hinterhölzl, Kristine Bentzen, Augustin Speyer, and Luka Szucsich. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Heck, Fabian. 2000. “Tiefenoptimierung: Deutsche Wortstellung als wettbewerbsgesteuerte Basisgenerierung.” Linguistische Berichte, 184: 1061–468.
-
Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2006. Scrambling, Remnant Movement, and Restructuring in West Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195308211.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Höhle, Tilman. 1986. “ Der Begriff Mittelfeld: Anmerkungen über die Theorie der topologischen Felder.” In Akten des 7. Int. Germanisten-Kongresses, edited by Walter Weiss, Ernst H. Wiegand, and Marga Reis, 3: 329–340.
-
Höhle, Tilman. 1991. “ On Reconstruction and Coordination.” In Representation and Derivation in the Theory of Grammar, edited by Hubert Haider and Klaus Netter, 139–197. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10.1007/978-94-011-3446-0_5 Google Scholar
-
Holmberg, Anders, and Christer Platzack. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780195067453.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Hoop, Helen de. 1992. “ Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation.” PhD diss., University of Groningen.
-
Hoop, Helen de, and Wim Kosmeijer. 1995. “ Case and Scrambling: D-Structure versus S-Structure.” In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, edited by Hubert Haider, Sue Olsen, and Sten Vikner, 139–158. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10.1007/978-94-015-8416-6_6 Google Scholar
- Kieft, Pieter. 1963. Deutsche Sprachlehre. Zutphen: Thieme.
- Koopman, Helen. 1995. “On Verbs That Fail to Undergo V-Second.” Linguistic Inquiry, 26: 137–163.
- Kratzer, Angelika. 1984. “ On Deriving Differences between German and English.” MS, Technical University Berlin.
- Kress, Bruno. 1982. Isländische Grammatik. Munich: Hueber.
-
Ivona Kučerová, and Ad Neeleman, eds. 2012. Contrasts and Positions in Information Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511740084 Google Scholar
-
Lenerz, Jürgen. 1994. “ Pronomenprobleme.” In Was determiniert Wortstellungsvarianten? Studien zu einem Interaktionsfeld von Grammatik, Pragmatik und Sprachtypologie, edited by Brigitte Haftka, 161–173. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
10.1007/978-3-322-90875-9_10 Google Scholar
-
Mahajan, Anoop. 1994. “ Toward a Unified Theory of Scrambling.” In Studies on Scrambling, edited by Norbert Corver and Henk Riemsdijk, 301–330. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10.1515/9783110857214.301 Google Scholar
- Mahajan, Anoop. 1997. “ Against a Rightward Movement Analysis of Extraposition and Rightward Scrambling in Hindi.” In Scrambling, edited by Shigeo Tonoike, 93–126. Tokyo: Kurosio.
- McKay, Terence. 1985. Infinitival Complements in German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Moltmann, Friederike. 1990. Scrambling in German and the Specificity Effect. MS, MIT.
-
Müller, Gereon. 1995. A-Bar Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10.1515/9783110814286 Google Scholar
- Müller, Gereon. 1997. Incomplete Category Fronting. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
-
Müller, Gereon, and Wolfgang Sternefeld. 1994. “ Scrambling as A′-Movement.” In Studies on Scrambling: Movement and Non-Movement Approaches to Free Word-Order Phenomena, edited by Norbert Corver and Henk Riemsdijk, 331–385. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10.1515/9783110857214.331 Google Scholar
- Müller, Stefan. 2005. “Zur Analyse der scheinbar mehrfachen Vorfeldbesetzung.” Linguistische Berichte, 203: 297–330.
-
Neeleman, Ad. 1994. “ Scrambling as a D-Structure Phenomenon.” In Studies on Scrambling, edited by Norbert Corver and H. Riemsdijk, 387–429. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10.1515/9783110857214.387 Google Scholar
- Neeleman, Ad, and Hans van de Koot. 2008. “Dutch Scrambling and the Nature of Discourse Templates.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 11 (2): 137–189.
-
Neeleman, Ad, and Fred Weerman. 1999. Flexible Syntax: A Theory of Case and Arguments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10.1007/978-94-011-4289-2 Google Scholar
- Paardekooper, Petrus C. 1963. Beknopte ABN-Syntaxis (Zevende Druk, Sterk Uitgebreid). Eindhoven: Author.
- Platzack, Christer. 1987. “The Scandinavian Languages and the Null Subject Parameter.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 5 (3): 377–401.
- Postal, Paul. 1993. “Parasitic Gaps and the Across-the-Board Phenomenon.” Linguistic Inquiry, 26: 735–54
-
Rosengren, Inger. 1993. “ Wahlfreiheit mit Konsequenzen: Scrambling, Topikalisierung und FHG im Dienste der Informationsstrukturierung.” In Wortstellung und Informationsstruktur, edited by Marga Reis, 251–312. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
10.1515/9783111658469.251 Google Scholar
- Ross, John. 1967. “ Constraints on Variables in Syntax.” PhD diss., MIT.
-
Ruys, Eddy G.
2001. “Dutch Scrambling and the Strong–Weak Distinction.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 4: 39–67
10.1023/A:1012209621512 Google Scholar
- Safir, Ken. 1985. Syntactic Chains. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Saito, Mamoru. 2003. “A Derivational Approach to the Interpretation of Scrambling Chains.” Lingua, 113: 481–518
- Saito, Mamoru, and Naoki Fukui. 1998. “Order in Phrase Structure and Movement.” Linguistic Inquiry, 29: 439–474.
-
Sauerland, Uli. 1999. “Erasability and Interpretation.” Syntax, 2: 161–188.
10.1111/1467-9612.00019 Google Scholar
-
Stechow, Arnim von, and Wolfgang Sternefeld. 1988. Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
10.1007/978-3-322-91923-6 Google Scholar
- Vikner, Sten. 1994. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Vikner, Sten. 2002. “ Verb Movement Variation in Germanic and Optimality Theory.” MS, University of Tübingen (Habilitationsschrift).
- Webelhuth, Gert. 1992. Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Yip, Moira, Joan Maling, and Ray Jackendoff. 1987. “Case in Tiers.” Language, 63: 217–250.
-
Malte Zimmermann and Caroline Féry, eds. 2009. Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 1994. “Dutch is Head Initial.” Linguistic Review, 11 (3/4): 377–406.
Further readings
-
Norbert Corver, and Henk Riemsdijk, eds. 1994. Studies on Scrambling: Movement and Non-Movement Approaches to Free Word-Order Phenomena. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10.1515/9783110857214 Google Scholar
-
Günther Grewendorf, and Wolfgang Sternefeld, eds. 1990. Scrambling and Barriers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.1075/la.5 Google Scholar
-
Susan M. Powers, and Cornelia Hamann, eds. 2000. The Acquisition of Scrambling and Cliticization. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10.1007/978-94-017-3232-1 Google Scholar
- Joachim Sabel, and Mamoru Saito, eds. 2005. The Free Word Order Phenomenon: Its Syntactic Sources and Diversity. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Karimi Simin, ed. 2003. Word Order and Scrambling. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Shigeo Tonoike, ed. 1997. Scrambling. Tokyo: Kurosio.
Citing Literature
The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition
Browse other articles of this reference work: