Event-Related Potentials
Steven L. Bressler
Florida Atlantic University, Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Boca Raton, Florida
Search for more papers by this authorMingzhou Ding
University of Florida, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gainesville, Florida
Search for more papers by this authorSteven L. Bressler
Florida Atlantic University, Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Boca Raton, Florida
Search for more papers by this authorMingzhou Ding
University of Florida, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gainesville, Florida
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
It has long been known that the living brains of humans and other mammals generate macroscopic electromagnetic activity that can be recorded from both within and outside the head. From the earliest days of recording this activity, researchers have sought to understand its relation to brain function and to use it to monitor and assess brain state. Continuous records of brain activity, examined without regard to particular points in time, are often useful for determining brain state. However, more detailed knowledge of brain function depends on precise temporal registration of the activity to specific events, either in the external environment or self-generated. The Event-Related Potential (ERP) is a temporal signature of macroscopic brain electrical activity related to a sensory, motor, or cognitive event. The Event-Related Field (ERF) is the magnetic correlate of this activity.
Bibliography
- 1W. J. Freeman, Mass Action in the Nervous System. New York: Academic, 1975.
- 2E. J. Speckmann, Generation of field potentials in the brain. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1997; 37: 8S–10S.
- 3Y. C. Okada, J. Wu, and S. Kyuhou, Genesis of MEG signals in a mammalian CNS structure. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1997; 103: 474–485.
- 4F. Lopes da Silva and A. Van Rotterdam, Biophysical aspects of EEG and MEG generation. In: E. Niedermeyer and F. Lopes da Silva, eds., Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1982. pp. 15–26.
- 5P. Gloor, Neuronal generators and the problem of localization in electroencephalography: Application of volume conductor theory to electroencephalography. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1985; 2: 327–354.
- 6R. Elul, The genesis of the EEG. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 1972; 15: 227–272.
- 7W. A. Truccolo, M. Ding, K. H. Knuth, R. Nakamura, and S. L. Bressler, Trial-to-trial variability of cortical evoked responses: Implications for the analysis of functional connectivity. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002; 113: 206–226
- 8M. G. H. Coles and M. D. Rugg, Event-related brain potentials: An introduction. In: M. D. Rugg and M. G. H. Coles, eds., Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University, 1997. pp. 1–26.
- 9C. E. Schroeder, A. D. Mehta, and S. J. Givre, A spatiotemporal profile of visual system activation revealed by current source density analysis in the awake macaque. Cereb. Cortex 1998; 8: 575–592.
- 10L. Nowak and J. Bullier, The timing of information transfer in the visual system. In: J. H. Kaas, K. Rockland, and A. Peters, eds., Cerebral Cortex. New York: Plenum, 1998. pp. 205–241.
- 11C. S. Herrmann, Human EEG responses to 1–100 Hz flicker: Resonance phenomena in visual cortex and their potential correlation to cognitive phenomena. Exp. Brain Res. 2001; 137: 346–353.
- 12R. B. Silberstein, J. Ciorciari, and A. Pipingas, Steady-state visually evoked potential topography during the Wisconsin card sorting test. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995; 96: 24–35.
- 13S. K. Rosahl and R. T. Knight, Role of prefrontal cortex in generation of the contingent negative variation. Cereb. Cortex 1995; 5: 123–134.
- 14J. M. Fuster, The prefrontal cortex, mediator of cross-temporal contingencies. Hum. Neurobiol. 1985; 4: 169–179.
- 15G. R. Mangun and S. A. Hillyard, Mechanisms and models of selective attention. In: M. D. Rugg and M. G. H. Coles, eds., Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University, 1997. pp. 40–85.
- 16C. Tallon-Baudry, O. Bertrand, C. Delpuech, and J. Pernier, Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 Hz visual responses in human. J. Neurosci. 1996; 16: 4240–4249.
- 17S. Karakaş, O. U. Erzengin, and E. Başar, The genesis of human event-related responses explained through the theory of oscillatory neural assemblies. Neurosci. Lett. 2000; 285: 45–48.
- 18D. Melkonian, E. Gordon, and H. Bahramali, Single-event-related potential analysis by means of fragmentary decomposition. Biol. Cybern. 2001; 85: 219–229.
- 19S. Makeig, S. Debener, J. Onton, and A. Delorme, Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004; 8: 204–210.
- 20A. S. Gevins, Overview of computer analysis. In: A. S. Gevins and A. Rémond eds., Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987, pp. 31–83.
- 21C. D. Woody, Characterization of an adaptive filter for the analysis of variable latency neuroelectric signals. Med. Biol. Eng. 1967; 5: 539–553.
- 22H. Liang, S. L. Bressler, M. Ding, W. A. Truccolo, and R. Nakamura, Synchronized activity in prefrontal cortex during anticipation of visuomotor processing. Neuroreport 2002; 13: 2011–2015.
- 23M. Browne and T. R. Cutmore, Adaptive wavelet filtering for analysis of event-related potentials from the electro-encephalogram. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2000; 38: 645–652.
- 24E. Donchin and E. Heffley, Multivariate analysis of event-related potential data: A tutorial review. In: D. Otto D ed., Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Event-Related Potential Research (EPA 600/9-77-043). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1979. pp. 555–572.
- 25C. C. Wood and G. McCarthy, Principal component analysis of event-related potentials: Simulation studies demonstrate misallocation of variance across components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1984; 59: 249–260.
- 26J. Kayser and C. E. Tenke, Trusting in or breaking with convention: Towards a renaissance of principal components analysis in electrophysiology. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2005; 116: 1747–1753.
- 27J. V. Stone, Independent component analysis: an introduction. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002; 6: 59–64.
- 28P. P. Mitra and B. Pesaran, Analysis of dynamic brain imaging data. Biophys. J. 1999; 76: 691–708.
- 29A. Bruns, Fourier-, Hilbert- and wavelet-based signal analysis: Are they really different approaches? J. Neurosci. Methods 2004; 137: 321–332.
- 30P. J. Franaszczuk, K. J. Blinowska, and M. Kowalczyk, The application of parametric multichannel spectral estimates in the study of electrical brain activity. Biol. Cybern. 1985; 51: 239–247.
- 31F. H. Lopes da Silva and N. J. I. Mars, Parametric methods in EEG analysis. In: A. S. Gevins and A. Rémond eds., Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987. pp. 243–260.
- 32M. Ding, S. L. Bressler, W. Yang, and H. Liang, Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: Data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment. Biol. Cybern. 2000; 83: 35–45.
- 33D. Lehmann, Principles of spatial analysis. In: A. S. Gevins and A. Rémond eds., Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987, pp. 309–354.
- 34W. J. Freeman, The wave packet: An action potential for the 21st century. J. Integr. Neurosci. 2003; 2: 3–30.
- 35W. J. Freeman, L. J. Rogers, M. D. Holmes, and D. L. Silbergeld, Spatial spectral analysis of human electrocorticograms including the alpha and gamma bands. J. Neurosci. Methods 2000; 95: 111–121.
- 36A. Fuchs, J. K. Jirsa, and J. A. Kelso, Theory of the relation between human brain activity (MEG) and hand movements. Neuroimage 2000; 11: 359–369.
- 37F. Darvas, D. Pantazis, E. Kucukaltun-Yildirim, and R. M. Leahy, Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: Methods and validation. Neuroimage 2004; 23: S289–S299.
- 38N. J. I. Mars and F. H. Lopes da Silva, EEG analysis methods based on information theory. In: A. S. Gevins and A. Rémond eds., Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1987. pp. 297–307.
- 39N. Wiener, The theory of prediction. In: E. F. Beckenback ed., Modern Mathematics for Engineers, Series 1. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
- 40C. W. J. Granger, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 1969; 37: 424–438.
- 41J. Geweke, Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1982; 77: 304–313.
- 42A. Brovelli, M. Ding, A. Ledberg, Y. Chen, R. Nakamura, and S. L. Bressler, Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: Directional influences revealed by granger causality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004; 101: 9849–9854.