Assessment of Institutions

Volume 3. Social Work Practice
II. Assessment and Intervention with Specific Populations
Heather K. Horton

Heather K. Horton

State University of New York—Albany, School of Social Welfare, Albany, New York, US

Search for more papers by this author
Katharine Briar-Lawson

Katharine Briar-Lawson

State University of New York—Albany, School of Social Welfare, Albany, New York, US

Search for more papers by this author
William Rowe

William Rowe

University of South Florida, School of Social Work, Tampa, Florida, US

Search for more papers by this author
Brian Roland

Brian Roland

State University of New York—Albany, School of Social Welfare, Albany, New York, US

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

This chapter traces the development of institutions in the United States, Canada, and Great Britain, as well as the need for inspections and reform. Some of this reform was driven by the deinstitutionalization movement with an emphasis on community-based care that embraced the concepts of normalization and least restrictive environment. Current frameworks for assessing institutional effectiveness are compared. Highlighting the shift to quality assurance, evidence-based assessment approaches, and their limitations are reviewed as well as their implications at the macro, mezzo, and micro levels of practice. Recognizing that institutions and programs must be continually evolving, the key elements of continuous quality improvement is discussed. Promising practices, such as institutions that are data-driven, using outcomes to generate improvements and innovations coupled with the notion of consumer guided change, are presented.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.