A Critique of Stage Theories of Human Development

Volume 2. Human Behavior in the Social Environment
Martha Pelaez

Martha Pelaez

College of Education, Florida International University, Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, Miami, Florida, US

Search for more papers by this author
Jacob L. Gewirtz

Jacob L. Gewirtz

Florida International University, Department of Psychology, Miami, Florida, US

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen E. Wong

Stephen E. Wong

Florida International University, School of Social Work, Miami, Florida, US

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 July 2008
Citations: 8

Abstract

Behavior analysis differs from most psychological accounts of human development. Under developmental stage theories, what children are ‘likely to do’ at ‘approximately what developmental level or age’ are emphasized, but not ‘how or why they do it—the process—is undisclosed and largely unknown. Those who focus on the development of hypothetical structures often miss many of the observable behavioral phenomena that are of importance in development. Pseudo-explanations like stage and critical periods do not lead to better prediction or control of the behaviors or mental capacities being studied. Further, such theories often invoke internal processes as causal factors, advancing hypotheses difficult to confirm/disprove with empirical research. Behavioral-analytic theory conceives development to be progressive behavior changes shaped by consequences. These behaviors in turn become “hierarchically organized.’ Behavior analysis is both a methodology for studying human development and a proven technology for increasing intellectual abilities and teaching useful skills. In this chapter we attempt to show that planned interventions based on this empirical behavioral foundation should be more effective and have more durable outcomes.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.