A Critique of Stage Theories of Human Development
Martha Pelaez
College of Education, Florida International University, Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, Miami, Florida, US
Search for more papers by this authorJacob L. Gewirtz
Florida International University, Department of Psychology, Miami, Florida, US
Search for more papers by this authorStephen E. Wong
Florida International University, School of Social Work, Miami, Florida, US
Search for more papers by this authorMartha Pelaez
College of Education, Florida International University, Department of Educational and Psychological Studies, Miami, Florida, US
Search for more papers by this authorJacob L. Gewirtz
Florida International University, Department of Psychology, Miami, Florida, US
Search for more papers by this authorStephen E. Wong
Florida International University, School of Social Work, Miami, Florida, US
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Behavior analysis differs from most psychological accounts of human development. Under developmental stage theories, what children are ‘likely to do’ at ‘approximately what developmental level or age’ are emphasized, but not ‘how or why they do it—the process—is undisclosed and largely unknown. Those who focus on the development of hypothetical structures often miss many of the observable behavioral phenomena that are of importance in development. Pseudo-explanations like stage and critical periods do not lead to better prediction or control of the behaviors or mental capacities being studied. Further, such theories often invoke internal processes as causal factors, advancing hypotheses difficult to confirm/disprove with empirical research. Behavioral-analytic theory conceives development to be progressive behavior changes shaped by consequences. These behaviors in turn become “hierarchically organized.’ Behavior analysis is both a methodology for studying human development and a proven technology for increasing intellectual abilities and teaching useful skills. In this chapter we attempt to show that planned interventions based on this empirical behavioral foundation should be more effective and have more durable outcomes.
References
- Baer, D. M. (1970). An age-irrelevant concept of development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 16, 238–246.
- Baer, D. M., & Rosales-Ruiz, J. (2003). In the analysis of behavior, what does “develop” mean? In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 339–346). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.
- S. W. Bijou, & E. Ribes (Eds.). (1996). New directions in behavior development. Reno, NV: Context Press.
- Bornstein, M. H. (1989). Sensitive periods in development: Structural characteristics and causal interpretations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 179–197.
- Bosch, S., & Fuqua, R. W. (2001). Behavioral cusps: A model for selecting target behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 123–125.
-
Bosch, S., &
Hixson, M. D.
(2004).
Behavior development and behavioral cusps.
Behavior Analyst Today,
5,
244–254.
10.1037/h0100033 Google Scholar
-
Chomsky, N.
(1968).
Language and mind.
San Diego, CA:
Harcourt Brace.
10.1037/e400082009-004 Google Scholar
- Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society ( 2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
- Freud, S. (1964). An outline of psychoanalysis. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1940)
- Frisch, S. A., & Schumaker, J. B. (1974). Training generalized receptive prepositions in retarded children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 611–621.
-
Gesell, A.
(1933).
Maturation and the patterning of behavior. In
C. Murchison (Ed.),
A handbook of child psychology.
Worcester, MA:
Clark University Press.
10.1037/11552-004 Google Scholar
- Gewirtz, J. L. (1969). Mechanisms of social learning: Some roles of stimulation and behavior in early development. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 57–212). Chicago: Rand-McNally.
- Gewirtz, J. L. (1978). Social learning in early human development. In A.C. Catania & T. Brigham (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis: Social and instructional processes (pp. 105–141). New York: Irvington Press.
- Gewirtz, J. L., & Pelaez-Nogueras, M. (1992). B. F. Skinner's legacy to infant behavioral development. American Psychologist, 47, 1411–1422.
- Gewirtz, J. L., & Pelaez-Nogueras, M. (1993). “Expectancy”: Sleight-of-hand mentalism, not mechanism or process. American Psychologist, 48, 1156–1157.
- Gewirtz, J. L., & Pelaez-Nogueras, M. (1996). In the context of gross environmental and organismic changes, learning provides the main basis for behavioral development. In S. Bijou & E. Ribes (Eds.), New directions in behavioral development (pp. 15–34). Reno, NV: Context Press.
- Guess, D. (1969). A functional analysis of receptive language and productive speech: Acquisition of the plural morpheme. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 55–64.
- Guess, D., Sailor, W., Rutherford, G., & Baer, D. M. (1968). An experimental analysis of linguistic development: The productive use of the plural morpheme. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 297–306.
- Haring, T. G., Roger, B. B., Lee, M., Breen, C., & Gaylord-Ross, R. (1986). Teaching social language to moderately handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 159–171.
- Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Establishing use of descriptive adjectives in the spontaneous speech of disadvantaged preschool children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 109–120.
- Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411–420.
- Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
- B. A. Iwata, J. S. Bailey, N. A. Neef, D. P. Wacker, A. C. Repp, & G. L. Shook (Eds.). (1997). Behavior analysis in developmental disabilities 1968–1995 ( 3rd ed.). Lawrence, KS: Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.
- Kohlberg, L. (1963). The development of children's orientations toward a moral order: Vol. I. Sequence in the development of moral thought. Vita Humana, 6, 11–33.
- Marr, J. M. (2003). The what, the how, and the why explanation of Ernst Maach. Behavior and Philosophy, 31, 181–192.
- McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., Mason, D., & McClannahan, L. E. (1983). A modified incidental-teaching procedure for autistic youth: Acquisition and generalization of receptive object labels. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 16, 329–338.
- McGee, G. G., Krantz, P. J., & McClannahan, L. E. (1985). The facilitative effects of incidental teaching on preposition use by autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 17–31.
- Morris, E. K. (1992). The aim, progress, and evolution of behavior analysis. Behavior Analyst, 15, 3–29.
- N. A. Neef, B. A. Iwata, D. C. Lerman, R. H. Horner, B. K. Martens, & D. M. Sainato (Eds.). (2004). Behavior analysis in education ( 2nd ed.). Lawrence, KS: Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.
- Novak, G., & Pelaez, M. (2002). A behavior-analytic developmental model is better. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 25, 466–468.
- Novak, G., & Pelaez, M. (2004). Child and adolescent development: A behavioral systems approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Patterson, G. R., Debaryshe, A., & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329–335.
-
Pelaez, M.
(2002).
Causes of behavior development and contextual variables.
Behavior Development Bulletin,
11,
9–16.
10.1037/h0100485 Google Scholar
- Pelaez-Nogueras, M. (1996). Multiple influences in behavioral interactions. Behavioral Development, 2, 10–14.
- Pelaez-Nogueras, M., & Gewirtz, J. (1997). The context of stimulus control in behavior analysis. In D. M. Baer & E. M. Pinkston (Eds.), Environment and behavior (pp. 30–42). Boulder, CO: Westview.
- Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psychology (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.
- Reese, H. W. (1999). Explanation is not description. Behavior Development Bulletin, 1, 1–3.
- Reid, W. J. (2004). Contribution of operant theory to social work practice and research. In H. E. Briggs & T. L. Rzepnicki (Eds.), Using evidence in social work practice: Behavioral perspectives (pp. 36–54). Chicago: Lyceum Books.
- Rosales-Ruiz, J., & Baer, D. M. (1997). Behavioral cusps: A developmental and pragmatic concept for behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 533–544.
- Schlinger, H. D. (1992). Theory in behavior analysis: An application to child development [Special issue: Special Reflections on B. F. Skinner and Psychology]. American Psychologist, 47, 1396–1410.
- Schlinger, H. D. (2002). Concepts in behavioral development. Behavior Development Bulletin, 1, 1–8.
-
Skinner, B. F.
(1957).
Verbal behavior.
East Norwalk, CT:
Appleton-Century-Crofts.
10.1037/11256-000 Google Scholar
- Taylor, B. A., & Harris, S. L. (1995). Teaching children with autism to seek information: Acquisition of novel information and generalization of responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 3–14.
- Thyer, B. A. (1983). Behavior modification in social work practice. In M. Hersen, P. Miller, & R. Eisler (Eds.), Progress in behavior modification (pp. 173–226). New York: Plenum Press.
- Thyer, B. A. (1987). Contingency analysis: Toward a unified theory for social work practice. Social Work, 32, 150–157.
- Thyer, B. A. (1992). A behavioral perspective on human development. In M. Bloom (Ed.), Changing lives: Studies in human development and professional helping (pp. 410–418). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
- Thyer, B. A., & Myers, L. L. (1997). Behavioral and cognitive theories for clinical social work practice. In J. Brandell (Ed.), Theory and practice in clinical social work (pp. 18–37). New York: Free Press.
- Thyer, B. A., & Myers, L. L. (2000). Approaches to behavioral change. In P. Allen-Meares & C. Garvin (Eds.), The handbook of direct social work practice (pp. 197–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Twardosz, S., & Baer, D. M. (1973). Training two severely retarded adolescents to ask questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 655–661.
- Williams, G., Pérez-González, L. A., & Vogt, K. (2003). The role of specific consequences in the maintenance of three types of questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 285–296.
Citing Literature
Comprehensive Handbook of Social Work and Social Welfare
Browse other articles of this reference work: