Volume 29, Issue 10 pp. 618-628
REVIEW - SYSTEMATIC

The common practice of “curbside consultation”: A systematic review

Amy Papermaster MSN, NP-C

Corresponding Author

Amy Papermaster MSN, NP-C

(Nurse Practitioner)

School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

Correspondence

Amy Papermaster, MSN, NP-C, School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, 1710 Red River, Austin, Texas 78701. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Jane Dimmitt Champion DNP, PhD, FNP, AH-PMH-CNS, FAANP, FAAN

Jane Dimmitt Champion DNP, PhD, FNP, AH-PMH-CNS, FAANP, FAAN

(Professor, Lee and Joseph D. Jamail Endowed Professorship in Nursing)

School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 August 2017

Disclosure:

Neither author has conflicts of interest relevant to the work.

Abstract

Purpose

Point-of-care information needs for nurse practitioners are tremendous. A phenomenon often referred to as curbside consultation (CC) with colleagues is an information source for point-of-care clinical decision making. This literature review was conducted to describe: (a) characteristics of CC, (b) consistency of CC definition, and (c) attitudes about CC among health professionals using this information source for point-of-care clinical decision making.

Methods

This literature review includes research conducted from 1980 to 2016 concerning CC among health professionals. Data bases including PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, Web of Science, PsychInfo, Business Source, and Cochrane Library were searched resulting in 15 articles for inclusion in this review. Fink's recommendations were used to assess study bias risk.

Conclusions

Only studies including physician samples met inclusion criteria. These studies, primarily from consultant perspectives, were conducted in varied settings and were considered highly valuable. CC s averaging 9.4 min were defined as informal advice and information-seeking without formal consultation.

Implications for practice

A paucity of information exists concerning CC use among nurse practitioners. An assessment of CC processes among nurse practitioners is indicated to inform education and practice for research dissemination ultimately promoting patient care quality.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.