Volume 43, Issue 11 pp. 2383-2390
Clinical Science

Assessment of antibodies to double-stranded DNA induced in rheumatoid arthritis patients following treatment with infliximab, a monoclonal antibody to tumor necrosis factor α: Findings in open-label and randomized placebo-controlled trials

P. J. Charles

P. J. Charles

Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
R. J. T. Smeenk

R. J. T. Smeenk

Sanquin CLB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
J. De Jong

J. De Jong

Sanquin CLB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
M. Feldmann

M. Feldmann

Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
R. N. Maini

Corresponding Author

R. N. Maini

Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, London, UK

The Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 1 Aspenlea Road, London W6 8LH, UKSearch for more papers by this author

Abstract

Objective

To compare the incidence of anti–double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving either single or multiple doses of a chimeric anti–tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) antibody or placebo infusions, with or without methotrexate, in open-label, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

Methods

Multiple sera obtained from 156 patients before and after treatment with infliximab and from 37 patients treated with placebo infusions were tested for anti-dsDNA antibodies by 3 methods: Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test (CLIFT), a commercial Farr assay (Ortho Diagnostics radioimmunoassay [RIA]) in which the antigen source is mammalian DNA, and a Farr assay employing 125I-labeled circular plasmid DNA (Central Laboratory of The Netherlands Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service [CLB] RIA). Patients with positive findings on the CLIFT were also tested for antibodies to histones (H1–H5) and chromatin and for IgM rheumatoid factors (IgM-RFs).

Results

None of the RA patients had a serum sample that was positive for anti-dsDNA antibodies by the CLIFT prior to infliximab therapy. Of the 22 patients who developed a positive CLIFT result, 11 (7% of 156 exposed to infliximab) also had positive findings on the Ortho RIA at a concentration of >10 units/ml and another 8 (5%) were positive at a concentration of >25 units/ml. In all but 1 patient, the anti-dsDNA antibodies were solely of the IgM isotype. Only 1 patient had detectable anti-dsDNA antibodies by the CLB RIA. All sera containing anti-dsDNA by the CLIFT contained antibodies to chromatin, and sera from 2 patients also contained antibodies to histones. IgM-RF titers showed a significant reduction following infliximab therapy in these 22 patients. One patient developed anti-dsDNA antibodies of IgG, IgA, and IgM isotype and had positive results on both Farr assays (peaking at 22 weeks and resolving by 54 weeks); this was associated with a reversible lupus syndrome.

Conclusion

Anti-dsDNA antibodies of IgM class are induced by infliximab therapy; the frequency is dependent on the assay method used. Only 1 of the 156 patients who were treated with infliximab developed a self-limiting clinical lupus syndrome; that patient developed high titers of anti-dsDNA antibodies of IgG, IgM, and IgA class, as detected by the CLIFT and by 2 different Farr assays.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me