The Impact of Health Care Policy Initiatives on Productivity
Corresponding Author
Magnus Tambour
Centre for Health Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden
Magnus Tambour, Centre for Health Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, PO Box 6501, S-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden. Tel: (+) 46 8 736 96 40; fax: (+) 46 8 30 21 15; e-mail: [email protected].===Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Magnus Tambour
Centre for Health Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Sweden
Magnus Tambour, Centre for Health Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, PO Box 6501, S-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden. Tel: (+) 46 8 736 96 40; fax: (+) 46 8 30 21 15; e-mail: [email protected].===Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This paper analyses productivity growth in health care delivery in Sweden and the impact of health care policy initiatives on productivity. In particular we consider the maximum waiting time guarantee introduced in Sweden 1992. The intention of the maximum waiting time guarantee was to shorten the waiting lists, partly through increased productivity. We measure productivity growth by estimating Malmquist productivity indices using non-parametric linear programming models. The productivity models are applied to data from a sample of public ophthalmology departments from 1988 to 1993. Positive productivity changes are found in several years, although no significant differences between the periods are found. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
- 1 The Federation of County Councils is a central body that represents the 23 county councils and 3 municipalities which are responsible for the provision and financing of most of the health care services for the Swedish citizens.
- 2 Coronary angiography (1) and coronary artery bypass grafting (2). Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (3), cataract surgery (4), inguinal hernia operation (5), cholecystectomy (6). Operation for -benign prostatic hyperplasia (7), -prolapse of the uterus (8), -incontinence (9). Hip and knee replacement (10, 11) and hearing-aid fitting (12).
- 3Socialstyrelsen. God vård i rätt tid. 1992 års vårdgaranti. Allmånna råd från Socialstyrelsen. 1991; 11. Stockholm, 1991. (Swedish National Board on Health and Welfare. Good Care in Time: The Maximum Waiting Time Guarantee for 1992).
- 4Socialstyrelsen. Vårdgaranti 1992. Uppföljning och utvårdering, Socialstyrelsen följer upp och utvärderar 1993; 11. Stockholm, 1993. (Swedish National Board on Health and Welfare. Maximum Waiting Time Guarantee in 1992. Follow-up and Evaluation).
- 5 Hanning, M. Maximum waiting-time guarantee – an attempt to reduce waiting lists in Sweden. Health Policy, 1996; 36 (1): 17–35.
- 6 SPRI. O̊gonsjukvården 1988-1991. SPRI Rapport 334. Stockholm: SPRI, 1992. (The Swedish Institute for Health Services Development. Ophthalmology 1988–1991).
- 7 Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lindgren, B. and Roos, P. Productivity developments in Swedish hospitals: a Malmquist output index approach, 1989. In A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin and L. S. Seiford (Eds) Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1995.
- 8 Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Roos, P. Produktivitetsutvecklingen inom sjukhussektorn 1970–1992. In Ds 1994: 71, Den offentliga sektorns produktivitetsutveckling 1980-1992. Rapport to ESO, 1994. (The productivity development in the hospital sector 1980-1992. In Ministry of Finance, Ds 1994:71, The Productivity Development in the Public Sector).
- 9
Malmquist, S.
Index numbers and indifference surfaces.
Trabajos de Estatistica
1953;
4:
209–242.
10.1007/BF03006863 Google Scholar
- 10The first application on hospital data appeared in Ref. 7.
- 11 Fare, R., Grosskopf, S. and Roos, P. Productivity and quality changes in Swedish pharmacies. International Journal of Production Economics 1995; 39: 137–147.
- 12 Shephard, R. W. Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970.
- 13 We assume that the output set is a convex and compact set that satisfies strong disposability of inputs, outputs and quality attributes.
- 14 Farrell, M. J. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1957; 120: Series A, Part 3, 253–281.
- 15 Caves, D., Christensen, L. and Diewert, E. W. The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity, Econometrica 1982; 50: 1393–1414.
- 16
Fixler, D. and
Zieschang, K.
Incorporating ancillary measures of process and quality into a superlative productivity index,
Journal of Productivity Analysis
1992;
3
(2):
245–267.
10.1007/BF00156469 Google Scholar
- 17 Löthgren, M. A Short Note on the Interpretation of the Malmquist Index. Mimeo. Stockholm: Department of Economic Statistics, Stockholm School of Economics, 1994.
- 18 Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Lovell, C. A. K. Production Frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
- 19VRS = variable returns to scale and CRS = constant returns to scale.
- 20 Grosskopf, S. Efficiency and productivity. In H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell and S. S. Schmidt (Eds), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Techniques and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
- 21
H. O. Fried,
C. A. Lovell K. and
S. S. Schmidt (Eds),
The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.
Techniques and Applications.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press,
1993.
10.1093/oso/9780195072181.001.0001 Google Scholar
- 22 Førsund, F. R. Productivity growth in Norwegian ferries. In H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell and S. S. Schmidt (Eds), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Techniques and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
- 23 Simar, L. and Wilson, P. W. Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models. Discussion Paper 9503. Louvain: Institut de Statistique, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1995.
- 24 Löthgren, M. and Tambour, M. Bootstrapping DBA-Based Efficiency Measures and Malmquist Indices. A Study of Swedish Eye-Care Service Provision. Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No. 78. Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics, 1995.
- 25 Atkinson, S. E. and Wilson, P. W. Comparing mean efficiency and productivity scores from small samples: a bootstrap methodology. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1995; 6 (2): 137–152.
- 26 Grosskopf, S. and Valdmanis, V. Measuring hospital performance – a non-parametric approach. Journal of Health Economics, 1987; 6: 89–107.
- 27 Burgess, J. F. and Wilson, P. W. Technical efficiency in Veterans Administration hospitals. In H. O. Fried, C. A. K. Lovell and S. S. Schmidt (Eds), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Techniques and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993.
- 28 Landstingsförbundet. Aktuella väntetider, Patienter på väntelista mm för behandlingar/insatser som omfattas av Vårdgarantin, Stockholm. Flera utgävor, 1992–1994 (Federation of County Councils. Current Waiting Times, Patients on Waiting Lists, etc. Concerning Treatments with Maximum Waiting Time Guarantee. Several issues, 1992–1994).
- 29In 1992 three surveys were made and in 1993 two surveys were made (average values are used to compute theoretical waiting times). For the remaining periods we have data from surveys made once each year.
- 30 SPRI, Ouml;gonsjukvärd. SPRI Rapport 312. Stockholm: SPRI, 1991. (Swedish Institute for the Health and Social Services, Ophthalmology).
- 31Note that data from T periods gives T-1 Malmquist indices for each department, where the first indices use data from period t = 1 and t = 2 and the last use data from period T and T-1.
- 32Geometric means are used in order to preserve the multiplicative decomposition in equation (5). See also Ref. 11, p 140.
- 33Note that the same procedure is also applied to the efficiency-, scale efficiency- and technology change decomposition.
- 34In the empirical application, J = 1000. This number of iterations has been suggested by Efron and Tibshirani35 for estimation of bootstrap confidence intervals.
- 35
Efron, B. and
Tibshirani, R. J.
An Introduction to the Bootstrap.
Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, No. 57.
Chapman and Hall, New York, London,
1993.
10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 Google Scholar
- 36 Efron, B. Better bootstrap confidence intervals, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1987; 82 (397): 171–185.