Volume 20, Issue 4 pp. 446-452
Main Article

Electrodiagnostic findings related to anti-GM1 and anti-GQ1b antibodies in Guillain-Barré syndrome

Bart C. Jacobs MD

Corresponding Author

Bart C. Jacobs MD

Department of Neurology, Erasmus University, Ee 2222, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Department of Immunology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Department of Neurology, Erasmus University, Ee 2222, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The NetherlandsSearch for more papers by this author
Jan Meulstee MD, PhD

Jan Meulstee MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Erasmus University, Ee 2222, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Pieter A. van Doorn MD, PhD

Pieter A. van Doorn MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Erasmus University, Ee 2222, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Frans G. A. van der Meché MD, PhD

Frans G. A. van der Meché MD, PhD

Department of Neurology, Erasmus University, Ee 2222, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Antibodies against the gangliosides GM1 and GQ1b may induce conduction failure in mice. To investigate their possible site of action in the Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), we studied the relation between serum anti-GM1 and anti-GQ1b antibodies and electromyography in 124 GBS patients. Anti-GM1 antibodies were found in 22 (18%) and anti-GQ1b antibodies in 5 (4%) patients. Anti-GM1 antibodies were associated with low distal compound muscle action potential amplitudes and relatively high compound sensory nerve action potential (CSNAP) amplitudes. In none of the patients with anti-GQ1b antibodies could CSNAPs be detected. Patients with anti-GM1 and anti-GQ1b antibodies were heterogenous with respect to electrodiagnostic features exclusive for demyelination or axonal degeneration, although the anti-GM1 positive patients tended to have more axonal degeneration. In conclusion, electromyographic studies indicate selective and more severe damage of motor nerves in patients with anti-GM1 antibodies, while patients with anti-GQ1b antibodies have more severe damage of sensory nerves. These antibodies may interfere with the electrophysiologic properties of different nerve fibers and thereby contribute to the clinical heterogeneity in GBS. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Muscle Nerve, 20: 446–452, 1997

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me