Volume 21, Issue 6 pp. 378-386
Original Article

Rare epithelial sheets with “cancer-like” nuclei presenting against a background of cytologically normal-appearing endometrial epithelium in endometrial brush samplings: Establishing a differential diagnosis

John A. Maksem M.D.

Corresponding Author

John A. Maksem M.D.

Department of Pathology, Mercy Hospital Medical Center, Des Moines, Iowa

Department of Pathology, Mercy Hospital Medical Center, 400 University Ave., Des Moines, IA 50314.Search for more papers by this author
Steve S. Lee M.D.

Steve S. Lee M.D.

Department of Pathology, Mercy Hospital Medical Center, Des Moines, Iowa

Search for more papers by this author
Ellen B. Roose M.D.

Ellen B. Roose M.D.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mercy Hospital Medical Center, Des Moines, Iowa

Search for more papers by this author
Joel A. Carlson D.O.

Joel A. Carlson D.O.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mercy Hospital Medical Center, Des Moines, Iowa

Search for more papers by this author
Dennis P. Dornbier D.O.

Dennis P. Dornbier D.O.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mercy Hospital Medical Center, Des Moines, Iowa

Search for more papers by this author
Beverly L. Belsheim M.D.

Beverly L. Belsheim M.D.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mercy Hospital Medical Center, Des Moines, Iowa

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Liquid-fixed Tao brush samples showing small quantities (less than 10%) of endometrial epithelial sheets with cancer-like nuclei that are admixed with benign endometrium raise a concern about false-positive cytology interpretations. This paper details 7 cases along with the outcomes of three prior papers that touch on the differential diagnosis of “small amounts of atypical epithelium with cancer-like nuclei.” Liquid-fixed, cytocentrifuge-processed Tao brush endometrial samples from 7 women showing “small amounts of atypical epithelium with cancer-like nuclei” were followed up by hysterectomy. Clinical presentations, diagnostic tests, surgical procedures, and tissue outcomes are detailed. Four women had hyperplastic polyps (three with focal atypical complex hyperplasia, and one with focal atypical simple hyperplasia). One had endometrial microcarcinoma. One had p53-positive endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (EIC). One had endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). The differential diagnosis of the index cytological finding, “small quantities of endometrial epithelial sheets with cancer-like nuclei admixed with benign endometrium,” includes hyperplastic polyp, EIC, microcarcinoma/EIN, and carcinoma metastatic to the endometrium. Combining endometrial brushing, endovaginal sonography/sonohysterography, and selective immunostaining may be useful for both detecting and sorting out these lesions. Diagn. Cytopathol. 1999;21:378–386. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.