Volume 19, Issue 3 pp. 313-322
Research Article

Bootstrap confidence intervals for the sensitivity of a quantitative diagnostic test

Robert W. Platt

Corresponding Author

Robert W. Platt

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

McGill University–Montreal Children's Hospital Research Institute, 2300 Tupper St., Montreal, QC H3H 1P3, CanadaSearch for more papers by this author
James A. Hanley

James A. Hanley

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Hong Yang

Hong Yang

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Department of Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

We examine bootstrap approaches to the analysis of the sensitivity of quantitative diagnostic test data. Methods exist for inference concerning the sensitivity of one or more tests for fixed levels of specificity, taking into account the variability in the sensitivity due to variability in the test values for normal subjects. However, parametric methods do not adequately account for error, particularly when the data are non-normally distributed, and non-parametric methods have low power. We implement bootstrap methods for confidence limits for the sensitivity of a test for a fixed specificity and demonstrate that under certain circumstances the bootstrap method gives more accurate confidence intervals than do other methods, while it performs at least as well as other methods in many standard situations. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.