Evaluation of Airborne Transmission Mitigation in a Naturally Ventilated Humanitarian Emergency Tent Using a Novel Single-Gas Tracer Decay Technique
Corresponding Author
Vincenzo Gentile
Department of Energy “G. Ferraris” , Politecnico di Torino , Turin , Italy , polito.it
Search for more papers by this authorMarco Perino
Department of Energy “G. Ferraris” , Politecnico di Torino , Turin , Italy , polito.it
Search for more papers by this authorMarco Simonetti
Department of Energy “G. Ferraris” , Politecnico di Torino , Turin , Italy , polito.it
Search for more papers by this authorMarianna Nigra
World Food Programme , UN Humanitarian Response Depot , Innovation Lab , Geneva , Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorMichele Di Marco
Operations Support and Logistics , World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland , who.int
Search for more papers by this authorAnna Silenzi
Operations Support and Logistics , World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland , who.int
Search for more papers by this authorLuca Fontana
Operations Support and Logistics , World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland , who.int
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Vincenzo Gentile
Department of Energy “G. Ferraris” , Politecnico di Torino , Turin , Italy , polito.it
Search for more papers by this authorMarco Perino
Department of Energy “G. Ferraris” , Politecnico di Torino , Turin , Italy , polito.it
Search for more papers by this authorMarco Simonetti
Department of Energy “G. Ferraris” , Politecnico di Torino , Turin , Italy , polito.it
Search for more papers by this authorMarianna Nigra
World Food Programme , UN Humanitarian Response Depot , Innovation Lab , Geneva , Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorMichele Di Marco
Operations Support and Logistics , World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland , who.int
Search for more papers by this authorAnna Silenzi
Operations Support and Logistics , World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland , who.int
Search for more papers by this authorLuca Fontana
Operations Support and Logistics , World Health Organization , Geneva , Switzerland , who.int
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The rapid deployment of emergency tents for airborne disease containment necessitates effective and sustainable approaches. This study introduces an innovative emergency tent prototype, developed within the INITIATE2 project by WFP and WHO, that leverages natural ventilation to mitigate airborne transmission risks when humanitarian tents are deployed in response to epidemics. The tent features a two-zone design with a transparent barrier separating the patient area from the healthcare operator zone and exploits a suitable airflow path to reduce cross-contamination. In order to overcome the constraints imposed by the logistic of the on-site measurements, a novel asynchronous single-gas tracer decay methodology combined with a multizone gray box model was developed, enabling both on-site experimental testing of ventilation effectiveness and estimation of airborne pathogen concentrations for infection transmission risk analysis. This approach allowed for the quantification of interzonal exchanges and ventilation rates under various window configurations, simulating different natural ventilation regimes. Multiple ventilation scenarios were evaluated, revealing that partial windows opening (Scenario 2, with Scenario 1 being windows closed) optimized airflow, achieving up to 15 air changes per hour (ACH), a value aligned with CDC and WHO guidelines. Instead, fully open windows (Scenario 3) increased the ACH in the patient area but compromised, to a certain extent, the containment of the pathogens in the healthcare operator zone. Results highlighted, for all the tested scenarios, an unintended air recirculation between the patient and the doctor zones. While the gray box model effectively estimated flow rates across scenarios, it encountered limitations at ACH > 20 due to the photoacoustic equipment’s sampling constraints. The relatively slow acquisition time impacted on the data accuracy during rapid decay phases, where ventilation time constants were on the order of minutes. The design of the transparent barrier reflects a deliberate trade-off between airtightness and operational functionality, with the field methodology enabling an evidence-based assessment of its performance. These findings emphasize the need for refined airflow management and highlight the potential of natural ventilation in emergency healthcare settings. Future research directions include the development of high sampling rate, multigas, and multipoint monitoring tools, as well as enhanced tent designs that improve airtightness of the transparent barrier.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
ina5169036-sup-0001-f1.docxWord 2007 document , 5.1 MB | Supporting Information Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section. Supporting Information contains the following sections. S1: SF6 trends for Scenario 1. S2: SF6 trends for Scenario 2. S3: SF6 trends for Scenario 3. S4: Fitting of experiments with the gray box model for Scenario 1. S5: Fitting of experiments with the gray box model for Scenario 2. S6: Fitting of experiments with the gray box model for Scenario 3. S7: Direction of wind and intensity during the test campaign on the different scenarios. S8: Monitoring solar global radiation and wind intensity during the test campaign within the three different scenarios. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1
Fereiduni M. and
Shahanaghi K., A Robust Optimization Model for Distribution and Evacuation in the Disaster Response Phase, Journal of Industrial Engineering International. (2017) 13, no. 1, 117–141, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-016-0173-7, 2-s2.0-85010869452.
10.1007/s40092-016-0173-7 Google Scholar
- 2 Broach J. P., McNamara M., and Harrison K., Ambulatory Care by Disaster Responders in the Tent Camps of Port-au-Prince, Haiti, January 2010, Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. (2010) 4, no. 2, 116–121, https://doi.org/10.1001/dmphp.4.2.116, 2-s2.0-77957283290, 20526133.
- 3 Tan R. M. R., Ong G. Y. K., Chong S. L., Ganapathy S., Tyebally A., and Lee K. P., Dynamic Adaptation to COVID-19 in a Singapore Paediatric Emergency Department, Emergency Medicine Journal. (2020) 37, no. 5, 252–254, https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209634, 32321705.
- 4 Bagdasarian N., Mathews I., Ng A. J. Y., Liu E. H., Sin C., Mahadevan M., and Fisher D. A., A Safe and Efficient, Naturally Ventilated Structure for COVID-19 Surge Capacity in Singapore, Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. (2021) 42, no. 5, 630–632, https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.309, 32578525.
- 5 Obyn S., Van Moeseke G., and Virgo V., Thermal Performance of Shelter Modelling: Improvement of Temporary Structures, Energy and Buildings. (2015) 89, 170–182, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.12.035, 2-s2.0-84921326842.
- 6
Pomponi F.,
Moghayedi A.,
Alshawawreh L.,
D’Amico B., and
Windapo A., Sustainability of Post-Disaster and Post-Conflict Sheltering in Africa: What Matters?, Sustainable Production and Consumption. (2019) 20, 140–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.06.007, 2-s2.0-85067624598.
10.1016/j.spc.2019.06.007 Google Scholar
- 7
Nigra M.,
Silenzi A., and
Di Marco M., What Do an Anaesthesiologist, a Nurse, Two Designers, and a Professor in Architectural Technology Do Together in a Room? Crafting Interdisciplinarity as Response to Emerging Infectious Diseases, Proceedings of the Design Society. (2023) 3, 3871–3878, https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.2023.388.
10.1017/pds.2023.388 Google Scholar
- 8
Verderber S., Innovations in Transportable Healthcare Architecture, 2015, 1st edition, Routledge, London, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315684550.
10.4324/9781315684550 Google Scholar
- 9 Graham K., Rehman H., Ahmad M., Kamal M., Khan I., and Rowland M., Tents Pre-Treated With Insecticide for Malaria Control in Refugee Camps: An Entomological Evaluation, Malaria Journal. (2004) 3, no. 1, 25–27, https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-3-25, 2-s2.0-4844224124.
- 10 Crawford C., Manfield P., and McRobie A., Assessing the Thermal Performance of an Emergency Shelter System, Energy and Buildings. (2005) 37, no. 5, 471–483, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.09.001, 2-s2.0-13244268531.
- 11 Cornaro C., Sapori D., Bucci F., Pierro M., and Giammanco C., Thermal Performance Analysis of an Emergency Shelter Using Dynamic Building Simulation, Energy and Buildings. (2015) 88, 122–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.11.055, 2-s2.0-84919696604.
- 12 Albadra D., Vellei M., Coley D., and Hart J., Thermal Comfort in Desert Refugee Camps: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Building and Environment. (2017) 124, 460–477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.08.016, 2-s2.0-85044512357.
- 13 Ullal A., Aguacil S., Vannucci R., Yang S., Goyette Pernot J., Licina D., and Tombesi P., Comparing Thermal Performance of Standard Humanitarian Tents, Energy and Buildings. (2022) 264, 112035, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112035.
- 14 Manfield P., Ashmore J., and Corsellis T., Design of Humanitarian Tents for Use in Cold Climates, Building Research and Information. (2004) 32, no. 5, 368–378, https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321042000220990, 2-s2.0-4344642892.
- 15
Hamdan M.,
Abd Elhamid F., and
Dabbour L., Impact of Passive Techniques on Thermal Behavior of Emergency Shelters, Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology. (2021) 22, no. 3, 112–119, https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/135523.
10.12912/27197050/135523 Google Scholar
- 16 The World Health Organization, INITIATE2, 2022, WHO, [cited 2023 Dec 6]. Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/initiate2.
- 17 Bourouiba L., Fluid Dynamics of Respiratory Infectious Diseases, Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. (2021) 23, no. 1, 547–577, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-111820-025044.
- 18
Wells W. F., On Air-Borne Infection, American Journal of Epidemiology. (1934) 20, no. 3, 611–618, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118097, 2-s2.0-77957178387.
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a118097 Google Scholar
- 19 Riley R. L., Airborne Infection, The American Journal of Medicine. (1974) 57, no. 3, 466–475, 4212915.
- 20 Riley R. L., Mills C. C., O’Grady F., Sultan L. U., Wittstadt F., and Shivpuri D. N., Infectiousness of Air From a Tuberculosis Ward. Ultraviolet Irradiation of Infected Air: Comparative Infectiousness of Different Patients, The American Review of Respiratory Disease. (1962) 85, 511–525, 14492300.
- 21
Riley R. L., Indoor Airborne Infection, Environment International. (1982) 8, no. 1–6, 317–320, https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(82)90043-5, 2-s2.0-0019671192.
10.1016/0160-4120(82)90043-5 Google Scholar
- 22 Nazaroff W. W., Nicas M., and Miller S. L., Framework for Evaluating Measures to Control Nosocomial Tuberculosis Transmission, Indoor Air. (1998) 8, no. 4, 205–218, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1998.00002.x.
- 23 Gammaitoni L. and Nucci M. C., Using a Mathematical Model to Evaluate the Efficacy of TB Control Measures, Emerging Infectious Diseases. (1997) 3, no. 3, 335–342, 9284378.
- 24 Buonanno G., Morawska L., and Stabile L., Quantitative Assessment of the Risk of Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Prospective and Retrospective Applications, Environment International. (2020) 145, 106112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106112, 32927282.
- 25 Riley R. L., What Nobody Needs to Know About Airborne Infection, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. (2001) 163, no. 1, 7–8, 11208616.
- 26 Riley E. C., Murphy G., and Riley R. L., Airborne Spread of Measles in a Suburban Elementary School, American Journal of Epidemiology. (1978) 107, no. 5, 421–432, 665658.
- 27 Asai T., Kurosaki E., Kimachi K., Nakayama M., Koido M., and Hong S., Peak Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Within 5 s of face-to-face Encounters: An Observational/Retrospective Study, Scientific Reports. (2023) 13, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44967-x, 37845540.
- 28 Morawska L., Buonanno G., Mikszewski A., and Stabile L., The Physics of Respiratory Particle Generation, Fate in the Air, and Inhalation, Nature Reviews Physics. (2022) 4, no. 11, 723–734, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00506-7, 36065441.
- 29 Chen W., Qian H., Zhang N., Liu F., Liu L., and Li Y., Extended Short-Range Airborne Transmission of Respiratory Infections, Journal of Hazardous Materials. (2022) 422, no. 422, 126837, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126837.
- 30 Chen W., Zhang N., Wei J., Yen H. L., and Li Y., Short-Range Airborne Route Dominates Exposure of Respiratory Infection During Close Contact, Building and Environment. (2020) 176, 106859, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106859.
- 31
Narsimhaneli G. and
Ruckenstein E., The Brownian Coagulation of Aerosols Over the Entire Range of Knudsen Numbers: Connection Between the Sticking Probability and the Interaction Forces, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. (1985) 104, no. 2, 344–369, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(85)90044-X, 2-s2.0-0022043133.
10.1016/0021-9797(85)90044-X Google Scholar
- 32 Stadnytskyi V., Bax C. E., Bax A., and Anfinrud P., The Airborne Lifetime of Small Speech Droplets and Their Potential Importance in SARS-CoV-2 Transmission, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. (2020) 117, no. 22, 11875–11877, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2006874117, 32404416.
- 33 Xie X., Li Y., Chwang A. T. Y., Ho P. L., and Seto W. H., How Far Droplets Can Move in Indoor Environments - Revisiting the Wells Evaporation-Falling Curve, Indoor Air. (2007) 17, no. 3, 211–225, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00469.x, 2-s2.0-34249703515, 17542834.
- 34 Morawska L., Johnson G. R., Ristovski Z. D., Hargreaves M., Mengersen K., Corbett S., Chao C. Y. H., Li Y., and Katoshevski D., Size Distribution and Sites of Origin of Droplets Expelled From the Human Respiratory Tract During Expiratory Activities, Journal of Aerosol Science. (2009) 40, no. 3, 256–269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.11.002, 2-s2.0-59849085957.
- 35 Rahmani A., Dini G., Leso V., Montecucco A., Kusznir Vitturi B., Iavicoli I., and Durando P., Duration of SARS-CoV-2 Shedding and Infectivity in the Working Age Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, La Medicina del Lavoro. (2022) 113, no. 2, e2022014, https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v113i2.12724, 35481581.
- 36 Marr L. C. and Tang J. W., A Paradigm Shift to Align Transmission Routes With Mechanisms, Clinical Infectious Diseases. (2021) 73, no. 10, 1747–1749, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab722, 34415335.
- 37 Tang J. W., Li Y., Eames I., Chan P. K. S., and Ridgway G. L., Factors Involved in the Aerosol Transmission of Infection and Control of Ventilation in Healthcare Premises, Journal of Hospital Infection. (2006) 64, no. 2, 100–114, 16916564.
- 38 Balachandar S., Zaleski S., Soldati A., Ahmadi G., and Bourouiba L., Host-to-Host Airborne Transmission as a Multiphase Flow Problem for Science-Based Social Distance Guidelines, International Journal of Multiphase Flow. (2020) 132, 103439, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2020.103439.
- 39 Sze To G. N. and Chao C. Y. H., Review and Comparison Between the Wells-Riley and Dose-Response Approaches to Risk Assessment of Infectious Respiratory Diseases, Indoor Air. (2010) 20, no. 1, 2–16, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2009.00621.x, 2-s2.0-74049136084, 19874402.
- 40 Vita G., Woolf D., Avery-Hickmott T., and Rowsell R., A CFD-Based Framework to Assess Airborne Infection Risk in Buildings, Build Environ. (2023) 233, 110099, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110099, 36815961.
- 41 Vuorinen V., Aarnio M., Alava M., Alopaeus V., Atanasova N., Auvinen M., Balasubramanian N., Bordbar H., Erästö P., Grande R., Hayward N., Hellsten A., Hostikka S., Hokkanen J., Kaario O., Karvinen A., Kivistö I., Korhonen M., Kosonen R., Kuusela J., Lestinen S., Laurila E., Nieminen H. J., Peltonen P., Pokki J., Puisto A., Råback P., Salmenjoki H., Sironen T., and Österberg M., Modelling Aerosol Transport and Virus Exposure With Numerical Simulations in Relation to SARS-CoV-2 Transmission by Inhalation Indoors, Safety Science. (2020) 130, 104866, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104866, 32834511.
- 42 Buonanno G., Robotto A., Brizio E., Morawska L., Civra A., Corino F., Lembo D., Ficco G., and Stabile L., Link Between SARS-CoV-2 Emissions and Airborne Concentrations: Closing the Gap in Understanding, Journal of Hazardous Materials. (2022) 428, 128279, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128279, 35063838.
- 43 GAEF, Who Is the Gesellschaft für Aerosolforschung?, 2020, Gesellschaft für Aerosolforschung.
- 44 Zhang N., Chen X., Jia W., Jin T., Xiao S., Chen W., Hang J., Ou C., Lei H., Qian H., Su B., Li J., Liu D., Zhang W., Xue P., Liu J., Weschler L. B., Xie J., Li Y., and Kang M., Evidence for Lack of Transmission by Close Contact and Surface Touch in a Restaurant Outbreak of COVID-19, Journal of Infection.(2021) 83, no. 2, 207–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.05.030, 34062182.
- 45 Ai Z. T. and Melikov A. K., Airborne Spread of Expiratory Droplet Nuclei Between the Occupants of Indoor Environments: A Review, Indoor Air. (2018) 28, no. 4, 500–524, https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12465, 2-s2.0-85046663967, 29683213.
- 46 Su W., Yang B., Melikov A., Liang C., Lu Y., Wang F., Li A., Lin Z., Li X., Cao G., and Kosonen R., Infection Probability Under Different Air Distribution Patterns, Building and Environment. (2022) 207, 108555, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108555.
- 47 Peng Z. and Jimenez J. L., Exhaled CO(2) as a COVID-19 Infection Risk Proxy for Different Indoor Environments and Activities, Environmental Science & Technology Letters. (2021) 8, no. 5, 392–397, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.1c00183, 37566374.
- 48 Melikov A. K., Ai Z. T., and Markov D. G., Intermittent Occupancy Combined With Ventilation: An Efficient Strategy for the Reduction of Airborne Transmission Indoors, Science of the Total Environment. (2020) 744, no. 2, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140908, 32721678.
- 49 Knibbs L. D., Morawska L., Bell S. C., and Grzybowski P., Room Ventilation and the Risk of Airborne Infection Transmission in 3 Health Care Settings Within a Large Teaching Hospital, American Journal of Infection Control. (2011) 39, no. 10, 866–872, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2011.02.014, 2-s2.0-82655162298, 21658810.
- 50
Deng S.,
Lau J.,
Wargocki P., and
Wang Z., Associations Between Illness-Related Absences and Ventilation and Indoor Pm2.5 in Elementary Schools of the Midwestern United States, Environment International. (2022) 176, 107944, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4308051.
10.1016/j.envint.2023.107944 Google Scholar
- 51 Leung W. T., Sze-To G. N., Chao C. Y. H., Yu S. C. T., and Kwan J. K. C., Study on the Interzonal Migration of Airborne Infectious Particles in an Isolation Ward Using Benign Bacteria, Indoor Air. (2013) 23, no. 2, 148–161, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2012.00797.x, 2-s2.0-85027927813, 22725722.
- 52 Brüel & Kjær, Measuring Ventilation Using Tracer Gases, 1991, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre-AIVC.
- 53 Charlesworth P. S., Air Exchange Rate and Airtightness Measurement Techniques-An Applications Guide, 1988, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre-AIVC, Available from: https://www.aivc.org/sites/default/files/members_area/medias/pdf/Guides/GUAGMEASUREMENTTECHNIQUES.pdf.
- 54 Etheridge D. W. and Sandberg M., Building Ventilation: Theory and Measurement, 1996, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- 55 Sutcliffe H., A Guide to Air Change Efficiency, 1990, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre-AIVC, Technical. Available from: https://www.aivc.org/sites/default/files/members_area/medias/pdf/Technotes/TN28GUIDETOAIRCHANGEEFFICIENCY.PDF.
- 56 Brouns C. and Waters B., A Guide to Contaminant Removal Effectiveness, 1991, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre-AIVC, Available from: https://www.aivc.org/sites/default/files/members_area/medias/pdf/Technotes/TN28.2GUIDETOCONTAMINANTREMOVALEFFECTIVENESS.PDF.
- 57 Jung A. Z. M., An Analysis of Different Tracer Gas Techniques to Determine the Air Exchange Efficiency in a Mechanically Ventilated Room, ROOMVENT’94 Air Distribution in Rooms Proceedings, 1994, International Institute of Refrigeration, Available from: https://iifiir.org/en/fridoc/an-analysis-of-different-tracer-gas-techniques-to-determine-the-air-13076.
- 58 Rulet C. A. and Vandaele L., Airflow Patterns Within Buildings - Measurement Techniques, 1991, Air Infiltration and Ventilation Centre-AIVC.
- 59 Park S., Choi Y., Song D., and Kim E. K., Natural Ventilation Strategy and Related Issues to Prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Airborne Transmission in a School Building, Science of the total environment. (2021) 789, 147764, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147764, 34051507.
- 60 Wu Y., Tung T. C. W., and Niu J., On-Site Measurement of Tracer Gas Transmission Between Horizontal Adjacent Flats in Residential Building and Cross-Infection Risk Assessment, Building and Environment. (2016) 99, 13–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.01.013, 2-s2.0-84955280365, 32288039.
- 61 Lim T., Cho J., and Kim B. S., The Predictions of Infection Risk of Indoor Airborne Transmission of Diseases in High-Rise Hospitals: Tracer Gas Simulation, Energy and Buildings. (2010) 42, no. 8, 1172–1181, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.02.008, 2-s2.0-77955323585.
- 62 Andersson H., Sundberg M., Senkic D., Sandberg M., and Kabanshi A., FAST-AIR: Fast Analytic Systems for Tracer-Gas Assessment in Indoor Research: Development and Testing of CO2 Tracer-Gas System. RoomVent Conference Proceedings, 2024, Available from: diva2:1854806.
- 63 Miller S. L., Leiserson K., and Nazaroff W. W., Nonlinear Least-Squares Minimization Applied to Tracer Gas Decay for Determining Airflow Rates in a Two-Zone Building, Indoor Air. (1997) 7, no. 1, 64–75, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-1-00008.x, 2-s2.0-0043047550.
- 64
Heidt E. D.,
Rabenstein R., and
Schepers G., Comparison of Tracer Gas Methods for Measuring Airflows in Two-Zone Buildings, Indoor Air. (1991) 1, no. 3, 297–309, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1991.07-13.x, 2-s2.0-84907207909.
10.1111/j.1600-0668.1991.07-13.x Google Scholar
- 65 Albertin R., Pernigotto G., and Gasparella A., A Monte Carlo Assessment of the Effect of Different Ventilation Strategies to Mitigate the COVID-19 Contagion Risk in Educational Buildings, Indoor Air. (2023) 2023, 24, https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9977685, 9977685.
- 66 Nazaroff W. W., Residential Air-Change Rates: A Critical Review, Indoor Air. (2021) 31, no. 2, 282–313, https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12785, 33403728.
- 67 Liu Y., Misztal P. K., Xiong J., Tian Y., Arata C., Nazaroff W. W., and Goldstein A. H., Detailed Investigation of Ventilation Rates and Airflow Patterns in a Northern California Residence, Indoor Air. (2018) 28, no. 4, 572–584, https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12462, 2-s2.0-85046542838, 29665159.
- 68 Shinohara N., Kataoka T., Takamine K., and Gamo M., Distribution and Variability of the 24-h Average Air Exchange Rates and Interzonal Flow Rates in 26 Japanese Residences in 5 Seasons, Atmospheric Environment. (2011) 45, no. 21, 3548–3552, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.005, 2-s2.0-79955982952.
- 69 Buonanno G., Stabile L., and Morawska L., Estimation of Airborne Viral Emission: Quanta Emission Rate of SARS-CoV-2 for Infection Risk Assessment, Environment International. (2020) 141, 105794, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105794, 32416374.