How Usual Is “Play As You Usually Would”? A Comparison of Naturalistic Mother-Infant Interactions with Videorecorded Play Sessions in Three Cultural Communities
Corresponding Author
Monika Abels
Department of Communication and Information Sciences, Tilburg School of Humanities, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands tilburguniversity.edu
Search for more papers by this authorZaira Papaligoura
School of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece auth.gr
Search for more papers by this authorBettina Lamm
Culture and Development, Institute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany uni-osnabrueck.de
Search for more papers by this authorRelindis D. Yovsi
Culture and Development, Institute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany uni-osnabrueck.de
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Monika Abels
Department of Communication and Information Sciences, Tilburg School of Humanities, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands tilburguniversity.edu
Search for more papers by this authorZaira Papaligoura
School of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece auth.gr
Search for more papers by this authorBettina Lamm
Culture and Development, Institute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany uni-osnabrueck.de
Search for more papers by this authorRelindis D. Yovsi
Culture and Development, Institute of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany uni-osnabrueck.de
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In developmental research, mothers are frequently asked to “play as you usually would.” In this study, maternal behavior towards their three-month-olds in three cultural communities (Nso, Cameroon; Gujarati, India; Athens, Greece) was compared between videorecorded “play” situations and naturalistic observations. If there is consistency, videorecorded “play” episodes can be used as a proxy for daily behavior. Body contact, body stimulation, face-to-face situations, and object stimulation were coded. While individual mothers showed consistent levels of body contact and face-to-face and object stimulation in both situations, there were also high correlations across the different types of behaviors. Only body contact and object stimulation correlate significantly across behavioral frames but not with each other across or within either observational frame. They can therefore be understood as behaviors with some discriminatory power. Mothers generally show a higher frequency of behaviors in the videorecorded play situations than during the everyday observations across all three communities. However, the samples differ in the extent to which three of the four behaviors are seen more in the videorecorded play sessions. A broader and general understanding of mothers’ ethnotheories and daily activities in each community is required in order to interpret videographed “play as you usually would” situations.
References
- 1 Bornstein M. H., Tamis-LeMonda C. S., Hahn C.-S., and Haynes O. M., Maternal responsiveness to young children at three ages: longitudinal analysis of a multidimensional, modular, and specific parenting construct, Developmental Psychology. (2008) 44, no. 3, 867–874, https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.867, 2-s2.0-43949096216.
- 2 Hofer T., Hohenberger A., Hauf P., and Aschersleben G., The link between maternal interaction style and infant action understanding, Infant Behavior and Development. (2008) 31, no. 1, 115–126, 2-s2.0-37449018366, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.07.003.
- 3 Bornstein M. H., Haynes O. M., Pascual L., Painter K. M., and Galperín C., Play in two societies: Pervasiveness of process, specificity of structure, Child Development. (1999) 70, no. 2, 317–331, 2-s2.0-0033091350, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00024.
- 4 Keller H., Lohaus A., Kuensemueller P., Abels M., Yovsi R., Voelker S., Jensen H., Papaligoura Z., Rosabal-Coto M., Kulks D., and Mohite P., The bio-culture of parenting: evidence from five cultural communities, Parenting: Science and Practice. (2004) 4, no. 1, 25–50, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327922par0401_2.
- 5 Cote L. R. and Bornstein M. H., Child and mother play in three U.S. cultural groups: comparisons and associations, Journal of Family Psychology. (2009) 23, no. 3, 355–363, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015399, 2-s2.0-67650208760.
- 6 Lancy D. F., Accounting for variability in mother-child play, American Anthropologist. (2007) 109, no. 2, 273–284, 2-s2.0-34548393270, https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2007.109.2.273.
- 7 Gaskins S., Haight W., and Lancy D. F., A. Göncü and S. Gaskins, The cultural construction of play, Play and Development: Evolutionary, Sociocultural and Functional Perpectives, 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 179–202, 2-s2.0-84925745813.
- 8 Abels M., Keller H., Mohite P., Mankodi H., Shastri J., Bhargava S., Jasrai S., and Lakhani A., Early socialization contexts and social experiences of infants in rural and urban Gujarat, India, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. (2005) 36, no. 6, 717–738, 2-s2.0-27744479634, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105280511.
- 9 LeVine R. A., Dixon S., LeVine S., and LeVine R. A., Child Care and Culture: Lessons from Africa, 1996, Cambridge University Press.
- 10 Keller H., Cultures of Infancy, 2007, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ,USA; Psychology Press.
- 11 Keller H., Abels M., Lamm B., Yovsi R. D., Voelker S., and Lakhani A., Ecocultural effects on early infant care: A study in Cameroon, India, and Germany, Ethos. (2005) 33, no. 4, 512–541, 2-s2.0-31144442371, https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.2005.33.4.512.
- 12
Hewlett B. S. and
Lamb M. E., H. Keller, Y. H. Poortinga, and A. Schölmerich, Integrating evolution, culture and developmental psychology: explaining caregiver-infant proximity and responsiveness in central Africa and the USA, Between Culture and Biology, 2002, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489853.
10.1017/CBO9780511489853.012 Google Scholar
- 13 Walsh Escarce M. E., J. K. Nugent, B. M. Lester, and T. B. Brazelton, A cross-cultural study of Nepalese neonatal behavior, The Cultural Context of Infancy, Volume One: Biology, Culture, and Infant Development, 1989, Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, USA, 65–86.
- 14 Super C. M., Environmental effects on motor development: the case of ′African infant precocity′, Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. (1976) 18, no. 5, 561–567, 2-s2.0-0017189632.
- 15 Sharma D. and LeVine R. A., Child care in India: a comparative developmental view of infant social environments, New Directions for Child Development. (1998) no. 81, 45–67, 2-s2.0-0032153451.
- 16 Bakeman R., Adamson L. B., Konner M., and Barr R. G., !Kung infancy: the social context of object exploration, Child Development. (1990) 61, no. 3, 794–809, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02822.x, 2-s2.0-0025442374.
- 17 Emde R. N. and Harmon R. J., Endogenous and exogenous smiling systems in early infancy, Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry. (1972) 11, no. 2, 177–200, 2-s2.0-0015324440, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-7138(10)60071-4.
- 18
Keller H. and
Gauda G., H. Rauh and H. C. Steinhausen, Eye contact in the first months of life and its developmental consequences, Psychobiology and Early Development, 1987, 46, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 129–143, Advances in Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)60349-0, 2-s2.0-77956742899.
10.1016/S0166-4115(08)60349-0 Google Scholar
- 19 Trevarthen C., Playing into reality: conversations with the infant communicator, Winnicott Studies, 1993, 7, 67–84.
- 20 Lakhani A., Ganju S., and Mahale P., Reproductive and Child Health Status in the Nandesari Area, 1997, Deepak Charitable Trust, New Delhi, India.
- 21 Abels M., Baby Massage in Rural Gujarat, India. Physical Growth, Motor Development and Caregivers′ Ethnotheories, 2002, University of Osnabrueck.
- 22
Roopnarine J. L.,
Lu M. W., and
Ahmeduzzaman M., Parental reports of early patterns of caregiving, play and discipline in India and Malaysia, Early Child Development and Care. (1989) 50, no. 1, 109–120, 2-s2.0-0000721987, https://doi.org/10.1080/0300443890500109.
10.1080/0300443890500109 Google Scholar
- 23 Kakar S., The Inner World: A Psycho-Analytic Study of Childhood and Society in India, 1978, Oxford University Press.
- 24 Abels M., The Expression of Emotional Warmth: Ethnotheories of Rural and Urban Indian Mothers and Grandmothers, 2007, University of Osnabrueck, Osnabrück, Germany.
- 25 Chaudhary N., Listening to Culture, 2004, Sage, New Delhi, India.
- 26 Kurtz S. N., All the Mothers are One, 1992, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.
- 27 Banadzem J. L., I. Fowler and D. Zeitlyn, Catholicism and Nso traditional beliefs, African Crossroads: Intersections between History and Anthropology in Cameroon, 1996, Berghahn Books, Providence, RI, USA, 125–140.
- 28 Yovsi R. D., Ethnotheories about Breastfeeding and Mother-Infant Interaction, 2003, Lit Verlag.
- 29 Kyriazis N., Women′s employment and gender relations in Greece: Forces of modernization and tradition, European Urban and Regional Studies. (1998) 5, no. 1, 65–75, 2-s2.0-0031744477, https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649800500106.
- 30 Safilios-Rothschild C., A comparison of power structure and marital satisfaction in Urban Greek and French families, Journal of Marriage and the Family. (1967) 29, no. 2, 345–352, https://doi.org/10.2307/349696.
- 31 Georgas J., Intrafamily acculturation of values in Greece, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. (1991) 22, no. 4, 445–457, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022191224001, 2-s2.0-84970223901.
- 32
Svensson-Dianellou A.,
Smith P. K., and
Mestheneos E., Family help by Greek grandparents, Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. (2010) 8, no. 3, 249–263, 2-s2.0-77956234710, https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2010.498737.
10.1080/15350770.2010.498737 Google Scholar
- 33 Coulacoglou C. and Kotsoni E., C. Coulacoglou, The application of the fairy tale test in Greece, Exploring the Child’s Personality Developmental, Clinical and Cross Cultural Applications of the Fairy Tale Test, 2008, Charles C Thomas Publisher, Springfield, Ill, USA, 243–263.
- 34 Leyendecker B., Lamb M. E., Schölmerich A., and Fricke D. M., Contexts as moderators of observed interactions: a study of Costa Rican mothers and infants from differing socioeconomic backgrounds, International Journal of Behavioral Development. (1997) 21, no. 1, 15–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/016502597384965, 2-s2.0-0031082271.
- 35 Keller H., Yovsi R., Borke J., Kärtner J., Jensen H., and Papaligoura Z., Developmental consequences of early parenting experiences: Self-recognition and self-regulation in three cultural communities, Child Development. (2004) 75, no. 6, 1745–1760, 2-s2.0-10844293473, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00814.x.
- 36 Ainsworth M. D. S., Maternal Sensitivity Scales, 1969, http://www.psychology.sunysb.edu/attachment/measures/content/ainsworth_scales.html.
- 37 Lamm B., Gudi H., Freitag C., Teubert M., Graf F., Fassbender I., Schwarzer G., Lohaus A., Knopf M., and Keller H., Mother-infant interactions at home and in a laboratory setting: a comparative analysis in two cultural contexts, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. (2014) 45, no. 6, 843–852, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114532357, 2-s2.0-84901437206.
- 38 Connors E. and Glenn S. M., J. Haworth, Methodological considerations in observing mother-infant interactions in natural settings, Psychological Research: Innovative Methods and Strategies, 1996, Routledge, London, UK, 139–152.
- 39 Russell A., Russell G., and Midwinter D., Observer influences on mothers and fathers: self-reported influence during a home observation, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. (1992) 38, no. 2, 263–283.
- 40 MacDonald K., K. MacDonald, Parent-child play: an evolutionary perspective, Parent-Child Play: Descriptions and Implications, 1993, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, USA, 113–143.
- 41 Lancy D. F., The Anthropology of Childhood, 2008, Cambridge University Press.
- 42 van Lawick Goodall J., J. S. Bruner, A. Jolly, and K. Sylva, Mother chimpanzees′ play with their infants, Play Its Role in Development and Evolution, 1976, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, UK, 262–267.
- 43 Enomoto T., Social play and sexual behavior of the bonobo (Pan paniscus) with special reference to flexibility, Primates. (1990) 31, no. 4, 469–480, 2-s2.0-0000596053, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02382531.
- 44
Miller L. C. and
Nadler R. D., Mother-infant relations and infant development in captive chimpanzees and orang-utans, International Journal of Primatology. (1981) 2, no. 3, 247–261, 2-s2.0-51249181709, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02739333.
10.1007/BF02739333 Google Scholar
- 45
Bard K. A., Evolutionary roots of intuitive parenting: Maternal competence in chimpanzees, Early Development and Parenting. (1994) 3, no. 1, 19–28, https://doi.org/10.1002/edp.2430030104.
10.1002/edp.2430030104 Google Scholar
- 46 Fossey D., D. A. Hamburg and E. R. McCown, Development of the mountain gorilla (Gorilla gorilla beringei): the first thirty-six months, The Great Apes, 1979, Benjamin-Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, USA, 139–184.
- 47 Bard K. A. and Vauclair J., The communicative context of object manipulation in ape and human adult-infant pairs, Journal of Human Evolution. (1984) 13, no. 2, 181–190, 2-s2.0-0042686764, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(84)80062-7.
- 48 Horvat J. R. and Kraemer H. C., Infant socialization and maternal influence in chimpanzees, Folia Primatologica. (1981) 36, no. 1-2, 99–110, https://doi.org/10.1159/000156010, 2-s2.0-0019742034.
- 49 Lonsdorf E. V., Anderson K. E., Stanton M. A., Shender M., Heintz M. R., Goodall J., and Murray C. M., Boys will be boys: sex differences in wild infant chimpanzee social interactions, Animal Behaviour. (2014) 88, 79–83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.11.015, 2-s2.0-84902662587.
- 50 Lewis K. P., A. D. Pellegrini and P. K. Smith, Social play in the great apes, The Nature of Play: Great Apes and Humans, 2005, Guilford Press, 27–53.
- 51 Keller H., Papaligoura Z., Kuensemueller P., Voelker S., Papaeliou C., Lohaus A., Lamm B., Kokkinaki T., Chrysikou E., and Mousouli V., Concepts of mother-infant interaction in Greece and Germany, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. (2003) 34, no. 6, 677–689, 2-s2.0-0242381766, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103257035.