Volume 23, Issue 5 pp. 492-497
Original Article

Models of care for non-invasive ventilation in the Acute COPD Comparison of three Tertiary hospitals (ACT3) study

Kerry Parker

Kerry Parker

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Vara Perikala

Vara Perikala

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ali Aminazad

Ali Aminazad

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Zheng Deng

Zheng Deng

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Brigitte Borg

Brigitte Borg

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Catherine Buchan

Catherine Buchan

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jo Toghill

Jo Toghill

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Louis B. Irving

Louis B. Irving

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Jeremy Goldin

Jeremy Goldin

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
David Charlesworth

David Charlesworth

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Ajay Mahal

Ajay Mahal

Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Suhith Illesinghe

Suhith Illesinghe

Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew T. Naughton

Corresponding Author

Matthew T. Naughton

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Correspondence: Matthew T. Naughton, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Hospital, 55 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Alan Young

Alan Young

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 December 2017
Citations: 17
(Associate Editor: Maarten van den Berge; Senior Editor: Lutz Beckert)
Clinical trial registration: ACTRN12613000011785 at www.anzctr.org.au

ABSTRACT

Background and objective

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) improves clinical outcomes in hypercapnic acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD), but the optimal model of care remains unknown.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational non-inferiority study comparing three models of NIV care: general ward (Ward) (1:4 nurse to patient ratio, thrice weekly consultant ward round), a high dependency unit (HDU) (1:2 ratio, twice daily ward round) and an intensive care unit (ICU) (1:1 ratio, twice daily ward round) model in three similar teaching tertiary hospitals. Changes in arterial blood gases (ABG) and clinical outcomes were compared and corrected for differences in AECOPD severity (Blood urea > 9 mmol/L, Altered mental status (Glasgow coma scale (GCS) < 14), Pulse > 109 bpm, age > 65 (BAP-65)) and co-morbidities. An economic analysis was also undertaken.

Results

There was no significant difference in age (70 ± 10 years), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) (0.84 ± 0.35 L), initial pH (7.29 ± 0.08), partial pressure of CO2 in arterial blood (PaCO2) (72 ± 22 mm Hg) or BAP-65 scores (2.9 ± 1.01) across the three models. The Ward achieved an increase in pH (0.12 ± 0.07) and a decrease in PaCO2 (12 ± 18 mm Hg) that was equivalent to HDU and ICU. However, the Ward treated more patients (38 vs 28 vs 15, P < 0.001), for a longer duration in the first 24 h (12.3 ± 4.8 vs 7.9 ± 4.1 vs 8.4 ± 5.3 h, P < 0.05) and was more cost-effective per treatment day ($AUD 1231 ± 382 vs 1745 ± 2673 vs 2386 ± 1120, P < 0.05) than HDU and ICU. ICU had a longer hospital stay (9 ± 11 vs 7 ± 7 vs 13 ± 28 days, P < 0.002) compared with the Ward and HDU. There was no significant difference in intubation rate or survival.

Conclusion

In acute hypercapnic Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, the Ward model of NIV care achieved equivalent clinical outcomes, whilst being more cost-effective than HDU or ICU models.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.