Treatment-emergent CNS symptoms following triptan therapy are part of the attack
Corresponding Author
PJ Goadsby
Institute of Neurology, London, UK,
Professor P. J. Goadsby, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Tel. + 44 20 7829 8749, fax + 44 20 7813 0349, e-mail [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorDW Dodick
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ and
Search for more papers by this authorH-C Diener
Department of Neurology, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany,
Search for more papers by this authorP Tfelt-Hansen
Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark and
Search for more papers by this authorRB Lipton
Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
PJ Goadsby
Institute of Neurology, London, UK,
Professor P. J. Goadsby, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Tel. + 44 20 7829 8749, fax + 44 20 7813 0349, e-mail [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorDW Dodick
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ and
Search for more papers by this authorH-C Diener
Department of Neurology, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany,
Search for more papers by this authorP Tfelt-Hansen
Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark and
Search for more papers by this authorRB Lipton
Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
If treatment-emergent central nervous system (CNS) symptoms following triptan therapy represent direct pharmacological effects of the drug, they should occur independent of response to active drug. However, if they represent unmasking of neurological symptoms of the migraine attack after pain is relieved, they should be more common in responders both to active drug and to placebo. To explore this issue, we evaluated the relationship between the CNS adverse events and treatment response following triptan or placebo treatment. We used pooled data from seven double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving eletriptan 20 mg (E20, n = 402), eletriptan 40 mg (E40, n = 1870), eletriptan 80 mg (E80, n = 1393), sumatriptan 100 mg (S100, n = 275) and placebo (Pbo, n = 1024). Somnolence was more prevalent among 2 h headache responders than non-responders for all treatments, including E80 (8.8% vs. 5.0%; P < 0.05), E40 (6.4% vs. 5.0%; NS), E20 (4.0% vs. 2.0%; NS), S100 (4.7% vs. 3.2%; NS) and Pbo (7.6% vs. 3.0%; P < 0.05). Similarly, the incidence of asthenia was higher among patients who responded to treatment compared with those who did not respond to E80 (15.2% vs. 7.8%; P < 0.05), E40 (6.5% vs. 3.6%; P < 0.05), E20 (6.5% vs. 1.0%; P < 0.05), S100 (10.1% vs. 4.7%; NS) and Pbo (4.4% vs. 2.7%; NS). The generally higher rates of somnolence and asthenia in patients who respond to treatment suggests that these treatment-emergent neurological symptoms may represent the unmasking of CNS symptoms associated with the natural resolution of a migraine attack, rather than simply representing drug-related side-effects. The rate of somnolence in placebo responders is comparable to that in responders to E40 and E80, indicating that somnolence is related, at least in some important part, to headache relief and not treatment.
References
- 1 Goadsby PJ, Lipton RB, Ferrari MD. Migraine—current understanding and treatment. New Engl J Med 2002; 346: 257–70.
- 2 Headache Classification Committee of The International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Cephalalgia 1988; 8 (Suppl. 7): 1–96.
- 3 Pilgrim AJ. Methodology of clinical trials of sumatriptan in migraine and cluster headache. Eur Neurol 1991; 31: 295–9.
- 4 Tfelt-Hansen P. Efficacy and adverse events of subcutaneous, oral, and intranasal sumatriptan used for migraine treatment: a systematic review based on number needed to treat. Cephalalgia 1998; 18: 532–8.
- 5 Dahlof C. Sumatriptan nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine: a review of clinical studies. Cephalalgia 1999; 19: 769–78.
- 6 Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Roon KI, Lipton RB. Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in migraine: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Cephalalgia 2002; 22: 633–58.
- 7 Tfelt-Hansen P, De Vries P, Saxena PR. Triptans in migraine. A comparative review of pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of triptans in migraine. Drugs 2000; 6: 1259–87.
- 8 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177–88.
- 9 Davies GM, Santanello NC, Lipton RB. Determinants of patient satisfaction with migraine therapy. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 554–60.
- 10 Lipton RB, Cutrer FM, Goadsby PJ, Ferrari MD, Dodick DW, McCrory D et al. How treatment priorities influence triptan preferences in clinical practice: perspectives of migraine sufferers, neurologists,and primary care physicians. Current Med Res Opinion 2005; 21: 413–24.
- 11 Cutrer FM, Goadsby PJ, Ferrari MD, Lipton RB, Dodick DW, McCrory D et al. Priorities for triptan treatment attributes and the implications for selecting an oral triptan for acute migraine: a study of US primary care physicians (the TRIPSTAR Project). Clin Therapeutics 2004; 26: 1533–45.
- 12 Dodick D, Lipton RB, Martin V, Papademetriou V, Rosamond W, MaassenVanDenBrink A et al. Consensus statement: Cardiovascular safety profile of triptans (5-HT1B/1D agonists) in the acute treatment of migraine. Headache 2004; 44: 414–25.
- 13 Welch KMA, Mathew NT, Stone P, Rosamond W, Saiers J, Gutterman D. Tolerability of sumatriptan: clinical trials and post-marketing experience. Cephalalgia 2000; 20: 687–94.
- 14 Lipton RB, Pascual J, Goadsby PJ, Massiou H, McCarroll KA, Vandormeal K et al. Effect of rizatriptan and other triptans on the nausea sympom of migraine. Headache 2001; 41: 754–63.
- 15 Goadsby PJ. The pharmacology of headache. Prog Neurobiol 2000; 62: 509–25.
- 16 Lance JW, Goadsby PJ. Mechanism and management of headache, 7th edn. New York: Elsevier 2005.
- 17 Goadsby PJ, Dodick D, Lipton R, Almas M, Hettiarachchi J, Diener H et al. CNS adverse events in patients treated with triptans: side effect or symptom? Headache 2004; 44: 494.
- 18 Goadsby PJ, Ferrari MD, Olesen J, Stovner LJ, Senard JM, Jackson NC et al. Eletriptan in acute migraine: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison to sumatriptan. Neurology 2000; 54: 156–63.
- 19 Diener H-C, Jansen J-P, Reches A, Pascual J, Pitei D, Steiner TJ et al. Efficacy, tolerability and safety of oral eletriptan and ergotamine plus caffeine (Cafergot®) for the acute treatment of migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison. Eur Neurol 2002; 47: 99–107.
- 20 Sandrini G, Farkkila M, Burgess G, Forster E, Haughie S, Eletriptan Steering Committee. Eletriptan vs sumatriptan: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple migraine attack study. Neurology 2002; 59: 1210–7.
- 21 Sheftell F, Ryan R, Pitman V. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of oral eletriptan for treatment of acute migraine: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in the United States. Headache 2003; 43: 202–13.
- 22 Stark R, Dahlof C, Haughie S, Hettiarachchi J, Eletriptan Steering Committee. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral eletriptan in the acute treatment of migraine: results of a phase III, multicentre, placebo-controlled study across three attacks. Cephalalgia 2002; 22: 23–32.
- 23 Giffin NJ, Ruggiero L, Lipton RB, Silberstein S, Tvedskov JF, Olesen J et al. Premonitory symptoms in migraine: an electronic diary study. Neurology 2003; 60: 935–40.
- 24 Ferrari MD, The Subcutaneous Sumatriptan International Study Group. Treatment of migraine attacks with sumatriptan. New Engl J Med 1991; 325: 316–21.
- 25 Goldstein J, Ryan R, Jiang K, Getson A, Norman B, Block GA et al. Crossover comparison of rizatriptan 5 mg and 10 mg vs sumatriptan 25 mg and 50 mg in migraine. Headache 1998; 38: 737–47.
- 26 Teall J, Tuchman M, Cutler N, Gross M, Willoughby E, Smith B et al. Rizatriptan (MAXALT) for the acute treatment of migraine and migraine recurrence. A placebo-controlled, outpatient study. Headache 1998; 38: 281–7.
- 27 Tfelt-Hansen P, Teall J, Rodriguez F, Giacovazzo M, Paz J, Malbecq W et al. Oral rizatriptan versus oral sumatriptan: a direct comparative study in the acute treatment of migraine. Headache 1998; 38: 748–55.
- 28 The Diclofenac-K/Sumatriptan Migraine Study Group. Acute treatment of migraine attacks: efficacy and safety of nonsteriodal anti-inflammatory drug, diclofenac-potassium, in comparison to oral sumatriptan and placebo. Cephalalgia 1999; 19: 232–40.
- 29 Silberstein S, Tepper S, Brandes J, Diamond M, Goldstein J, Winner P et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of rofecoxib in the acute treatment of migraine. Neurology 2004; 62: 1552–7.
- 30 Goadsby PJ. Cluster headache and the clinical profile of sumatriptan. Eur Neurol 1994; 34 (Suppl.): 35–9.
- 31 Van Vliet JA, Bahra A, Martin V, Aurora SK, Mathew NT, Ferrari MD et al. Intranasal sumatriptan in cluster headache—randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study. Neurology 2003; 60: 630–3.
- 32 Cittadini E, May A, Straube A, Evers S, Bussone G, Goadsby PJ. Zolmitriptan nasal spray is effective and well tolerated in the acute treatment of cluster headache: a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study. Eur J Neurol 2005; 12 (Suppl. 2): 202.
- 33 Bahra A, Gawel MJ, Hardebo J-E, Millson D, Brean SA, Goadsby PJ. Oral zolmitriptan is effective in the acute treatment of cluster headache. Neurology 2000; 54: 1832–9.
- 34 Moore RA, Derry S, Makinson GT, McQuay HJ. Tolerability and adverse events in clinical trials of celecoxib in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of information from company clinical trial reports. Arthritis Res Ther 2005; 7: R644–65.
- 35 Weiller C, May A, Limmroth V, Juptner M, Kaube H, Schayck RV et al. Brain stem activation in spontaneous human migraine attacks. Nat Med 1995; 1: 658–60.
- 36 Bahra A, Matharu MS, Buchel C, Frackowiak RSJ, Goadsby PJ. Brainstem activation specific to migraine headache. Lancet 2001; 357: 1016–7.
- 37 Afridi S, Giffin NJ, Kaube H, Friston KJ, Ward NS, Frackowiak RSJ et al. A PET study in spontaneous migraine. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 1270–5.
- 38 Afridi S, Matharu MS, Lee L, Kaube H, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RSJ et al. A PET study exploring the laterality of brainstem activation in migraine using glyceryl trinitrate. Brain 2005; 128: 932–9.
- 39 Matharu MS, Bartsch T, Ward N, Frackowiak RSJ, Weiner RL, Goadsby PJ. Central neuromodulation in chronic migraine patients with suboccipital stimulators: a PET study. Brain 2004; 127: 220–30.
- 40 Amaral DG, Sinnamon HM. The locus coeruleus: neurobiology of a central noradrenergic nucleus. Prog Neurobiol 1977; 9: 147–96.
- 41 Stamford JA. Descending control of pain. Br J Anaesth 1995; 75: 217–27.
- 42 Aston-Jones G, Bloom FE. Activity of norepinephrine-containing locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats anticipates fluctuations in the sleep–waking cycle. J Neurosci 1981; 1: 876–86.
- 43 Hagan JJ, Leslie RA, Patel S, Evans ML, Wattam TA, Holmes S et al. Orexin A activates locus coeruleus cell firing and increases arousal in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 10911–6.
- 44 Smart D, Jerman J. The physiology and pharmacology of the orexins. Pharmacol Ther 2002; 94: 51.
- 45 Goadsby PJ, Lambert GA, Lance JW. Differential effects on the internal and external carotid circulation of the monkey evoked by locus coeruleus stimulation. Brain Res 1982; 249: 247–54.