Recent advances in medical management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Corresponding Author
Kenji Ikeda
Department of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence: Dr Kenji Ikeda, Department of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Toranomon 2-2-2, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8470, Japan. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Kenji Ikeda
Department of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence: Dr Kenji Ikeda, Department of Hepatology, Toranomon Hospital, Toranomon 2-2-2, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8470, Japan. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Transcatheter arterial therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have developed during the last decade. A fine powder formulation of cisplatin and the new platinum agent miriplatin became standard medicines in addition to anthracyclines in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in Japan. Recent prospective and retrospective studies supported the usefulness of platinum agents as a chemotherapeutic at the time of varied TACE therapy. Although balloon-occluded TACE is an effective therapy for localized HCC and drug-eluting microspheres seemed to show a higher response rate in certain HCCs, the definite advantages of those procedures still remain uncertain. Intermediate stage HCC, or Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B, is regarded as a heterogeneous category with a wide spectrum of tumors and patients, and several subclassifications of the stage have been proposed to show different prognoses; there are also different recommended therapies in each subgroup. Authors have subclassified patients based on combinations of tumor size, tumor number, and liver function, with or without performance status. Because of differences of available medical resources and techniques in treatment procedures between countries, the most ideal and useful subgrouping remains inconclusive at present. Recently, a few systemic chemotherapies proved to be effective for advanced stage HCC in phase III studies: lenvatinib as the first line of therapy, and regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab as second-line therapy. Other molecular-targeted and immune-oncological medicines are expected to follow in the near future. Some studies have suggested an advantage of early introduction of molecular-targeted therapy for TACE-resistant HCC in the intermediate stage.
References
- 1Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013; 63: 11–30.
- 2Singal AG, El-Serag HB. Hepatocellular carcinoma from epidemiology to prevention: translating knowledge into practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 2140–2151.
- 3Makuuchi M, Kokudo N. Clinical practice guidelines for hepatocellular carcinoma: the first evidence based guidelines from Japan. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 828–829.
- 4Kudo M, Izumi N, Kokudo N et al. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: consensus-based clinical practice guidelines proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) 2010 updated version. Dig Dis 2011; 29: 339–364.
- 5Omata M, Cheng AL, Kokudo N et al. Asia-Pacific clinical guidelines on the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 2017 update. Hepatol Int 2017; 11: 317–370.
- 6 European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2018; 287: 1050–1058.
- 7Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2018; 67: 358–380.
- 8Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 1999; 19: 329–338.
- 9Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 391: 1301–1314.
- 10Del Poggio P, Maddeo A, Zabbialini G, Piti A. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug-eluting beads. J Hepatol 2007; 47: 157–159.
- 11Varela M, Real MI, Burrel M et al. Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with drug eluting beads: efficacy and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics. J Hepatol 2007; 46: 474–481.
- 12Ikeda M, Arai Y, Park SJ et al. Prospective study of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: an Asian cooperative study between Japan and Korea. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24: 490–500.
- 13Ono Y, Yoshimasu T, Ashikaga R et al. Long-term results of lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization with cisplatin or doxorubicin for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2000; 23: 564–568.
- 14Kamada K, Nakanishi T, Kitamoto M et al. Long-term prognosis of patients undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of cisplatin lipiodol suspension and doxorubicin hydrochloride emulsion. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12: 847–854.
- 15Sahara S, Kawai N, Sato M et al. Prospective comparison of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with lipiodol-epirubicin and lipiodol-cisplatin for treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. Jpn J Radiol 2010; 28: 362–368.
- 16Kasai K, Ushio A, Sawara K et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with a fine powder formulation of cisplatin for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 3437–3444.
- 17Yodono H, Matsuo K, Shinohara A. A retrospective comparative study of epirubicin–lipiodol emulsion and cisplatin–lipiodol suspension for use with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Drugs 2011; 22: 277–282.
- 18Yamanaka K, Hatano E, Narita M et al. Comparative study of cisplatin and epirubicin in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2011; 41: 303–309.
- 19Kawamura Y, Ikeda K, Hirakawa M et al. Efficacy of platinum analogue for advanced hepatocellular arcinoma unresponsive to transcatheter arterial hemoembolization with epirubicin. Hepatol Res 2009; 39: 346–354.
- 20Maeda N, Osuga K, Higashihara H et al. Transarterial chemoembolization with cisplatin as second-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma unresponsive to chemoembolization with epirubicin-lipiodol emulsion. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35: 82–89.
- 21Seki A, Hori S. Switching the loaded agent from epirubicin to cisplatin: salvage transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting microspheres for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35: 555–562.
- 22Goda Y, Morimoto M, Irie K et al. Switch to miriplatin for multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma unresponsive to transarterial chemoembolization with epirubicin: a prospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017; 47: 1–6.
- 23Fujiyama S, Shibata J, Maeda S et al. Phase I clinical study of a novel lipophilic platinum complex (SM-11355) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to cisplatin/lipiodol. Br J Cancer 2003; 89: 1614–1619.
- 24Hanada M, Baba A, Tsutsumishita Y et al. Intra-hepatic arterial administration with miriplatin suspended in an oily lymphographic agent inhibits the growth of human hepatoma cells orthotopically implanted in nude rats. Cancer Sci 2009; 100: 189–194.
- 25Okabe K, Beppu T, Haraoka K et al. Safety and short-term therapeutic effects of miriplatin−lipiodol suspension in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular varcinoma. Anticancer Res A 2011; 31: 2983–2988.
- 26Miyayama S, Yamashiro M, Shibata Y et al. Comparison of local control effects of superselective transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using epirubicin plus mitomycin C and miriplatin for hepatocellular carcinoma. Jpn J Radiol 2012; 30: 263–270.
- 27Oguro S, Hashimoto S, Tanaka T et al. Short-term therapeutic effects of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using miriplatin–lipiodol suspension for hepatocellular carcinoma. Jpn J Radiol 2012; 30: 735–742.
- 28Aramaki T, Moriguchi M, Bekku E et al. Comparison of epirubicin hydrochloride and miriplatin hydrate as anticancer agents for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2012; 43: 475–480.
- 29Seko Y, Ikeda K, Kawamura Y et al. Antitumor efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with warmed miriplatin in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2013; 43: 942–949.
- 30Ueda T, Murata S, Yasui D, Mine T, Kumita S. Comparison of the antitumor efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with a miriplatin-iodized oil suspension and a cisplatin-iodized oil suspension for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2013; 43: 1071–1077.
- 31Iwazawa J, Hashimoto N, Ohue S, Muramoto O, Mitani T. Chemoembolization-induced arterial damage: evaluation of three different chemotherapeutic protocols using epirubicin and miriplatin. Hepatol Res 2014; 44: 201–208.
- 32Handa T, Imai Y, Sugawara K et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for epatocellular carcinoma: comparison of the therapeutic fficacies between miriplatin and epirubicin. Hepatol Res 2014; 44: 1072–1080.
- 33Yasui D, Murata S, Onozawa S et al. Improved efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using warmed miriplatin for hepatocellular carcinoma. BioMed Res Int 2014; 359296.
- 34Otsuji K, Takai K, Nishigaki Y et al. Efficacy and safety of cisplatin versus miriplatin in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and transarterial infusion chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Hepatol Res 2015; 45: 514–522.
- 35Ikeda M, Kudo M, Aikata H et al. Transarterial chemoembolization with miriplatin vs. epirubicin for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomized trial. J Gastroenterol 2018 Feb; 53: 281–290.
- 36Kubota K, Hidaka H, Nakazawa T et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled study of the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with miriplatin for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2017; 48: E98–E106.
- 37Ikeda K, Kawamura Y, Kobayashi M et al. Beneficial effect of arterial embolization with warmed miriplatin for multiple hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2016; 47: 632–640.
- 38Irie T, Kuramochi M, Takahashi N. Dense accumulation of lipiodol emulsion in hepatocellular carcinoma nodule during selective balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolization: measurement of balloon-occluded arterial stump pressure. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36: 706–713.
- 39Irie T, Kuramochi M, Takahashi N. Diameter of main tumor feeding artery of a hepatocellular carcinoma: measurement at the entry site into the nodule. Hepatol Res 2016; 46: E100–E104.
- 40Arai H, Abe T, Takayama H et al. Safety and efficacy of balloon-occluded transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using miriplatin for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2015; 45: 663–666.
- 41Ogawa M, Takayasu K, Hirayama M et al. Efficacy of a microballoon catheter in transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma using miriplatin, a lipophilic anticancer drug: short-term results. Hepatol Res 2016; 46: E60–E69.
- 42Maruyama M, Yoshizako T, Nakamura T et al. Initial experience with balloon-occluded trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (B-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016; 39: 359–366.
- 43Irie T, Kuramochi M, Kamoshida T, Takahashi N. Selective balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolization for patients with one or two hepatocellular carcinoma nodules: retrospective comparison with conventional super-selective TACE. Hepatol Res 2016; 46: 209–214.
- 44Kawamura Y, Ikeda K, Fujiyama S et al. Usefulness and limitations of balloon-occluded transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using miriplatin for patients with four or fewer hepatocellular carcinoma nodules. Hepatol Res 2017; 47: 338–346.
- 45Miyayama S, Matsui O, Yamashiro M et al. Ultraselective transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with a 2-F tip microcatheter for small hepatocellular carcinomas: relationship between local tumor recurrence and visualization of the portal vein with iodized oil. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2007; 18: 365–376.
- 46Nicolini A, Martinett L, Maggioni M, Sangiovanni A. Transarterial chemoembolization with epirubicin-eluting beads versus transarterial embolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 21: 327–332.
- 47Malagari K, Pomoni M, Kelekis A et al. Prospective randomized comparison of chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting beads and bland embolization with BeadBlock for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 33: 541–551.
- 48Brown K, Do RK, Gonen M et al. Randomized trial of hepatic artery embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using doxorubicin-eluting microspheres compared with embolization with microspheres alone. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 2046–2053.
- 49Forrer A, Ayuso C, Varela M et al. Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2009; 115: 616–623.
- 50Scartozzi M, Baroni GS, Faloppi L et al. Trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE), with either lipiodol (traditional TACE) or drug-eluting microspheres (precision TACE, pTACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: efficacy and safety results from a large mono-institutional analysis. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2010; 29: 164–171.
- 51Dhanasekaran R, Kooby DA, Staley CA, Kauh JS, Khanna V, Kim HS. Comparison of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and chemoembolization with doxorubicin drug eluting beads (DEB) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). J Surg Oncol 2010; 101: 476–480.
- 52Sacco R, Bargellini I, Bertini M et al. Conventional versus doxorubicin-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 22: 1545–1552.
- 53Wiggermann P, Sieron D, Brosche C et al. Transarterial chemoembolization of Child-A hepatocellular carcinoma: Drug-eluting bead TACE (DEB TACE) vs. TACE with cisplatin/lipiodol (cTACE). Med Sci Monit 2011; 17: CR189–CR195.
- 54Recchia F, Passalacqua G, Filauri P et al. Chemoembolization of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: decreased toxicity with slow-release doxorubicin-eluting beads compared with lipiodol. Oncol Report 2012; 27: 1377–1383.
- 55Song MJ, Chun HJ, Song DS et al. Comparative study between doxorubicin-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012; 57: 1244–1250.
- 56Nicolini D, Svegliati-Baroni G, Candelari R et al. Doxorubicin-eluting bead vs. conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 5622–5632.
- 57Petruzzi NJ, Frangos AJ, Fenkel JM et al. Single-center comparison of three chemoembolization regimens for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2013; 24: 266–273.
- 58Kloeckner R, Weinmann A, Prinz F et al. Conventional chemoembolization versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2015; 15: 465–474.
- 59Arabi M, BenMousa A, Bzeizi K, Garad F, Ahmed I, al-Otaibi M. Doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 175–180.
- 60Liu YS, Ou MC, Tsai YS et al. Transarterial chemoembolization using gelatin sponges or microspheres plus lipiodol-doxorubicin versus doxorubicin-loaded beads for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Radiol 2015; 16: 125–132.
- 61Facciorusso A, Mariani L, Sposito C et al. Drug-eluting beads versus conventional chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 31: 645–653.
- 62Duan F, Wang EQ, Lam MGEH et al. Superselective chemoembolization of HCC: comparison of short-term safety and efficacy between drug-eluting LC Beads, QuadraSpheres, and conventional ethiodized oil emulsion. Radiology 2016; 278: 612–621.
- 63Gorodetski B, Chapiro J, Schernthaner R et al. Advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: Conventional versus drug-eluting beads transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Eur J Radiol 2017; 27: 526–535.
- 64Monier A, Guiu B, Duran AR et al. Liver and biliary damages following transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison between drug-eluting beads and lipiodol emulsion. Eur J Radiol 2017; 27: 1431–1439.
- 65Lammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T et al. Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010; 33: 41–52.
- 66Golfieri R, Giampalma E, Renzulli M et al. Randomised controlled trial of doxorubicin-eluting beads vs. conventional chemoembolisation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer 2014; 111: 255–264.
- 67Pitton MB, Kloeckner R, Ruckes C et al. Randomized comparison of selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) versus drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015; 38: 352–360.
- 68Facciorusso A, Di Maso M, Muscatiello N. Drug-eluting beads versus conventional chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2016; 48: 571–577.
- 69Grosso M, Vignali C, Quaqretti P et al. Transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with drug-eluting microspheres: preliminary results from an Italian multicenter study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2008; 31: 1141–1149.
- 70Seki A, Hori S, Kobayashi K, Narumiya S. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with epirubicin-loaded superabsorbent polymer microspheres for 135 hepatocellular carcinoma patients: single-center experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34: 557–565.
- 71van Malenstein H, Maleux G, Vandecaveye V et al. A randomized phase II study of drug-eluting beads versus transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Onkologie 2011; 34: 368–376.
- 72Kucukay F, Badem S, Karan A et al. A single-center retrospective comparison of doxorubicin-loaded HepaSphere transarterial chemoembolization with conventional transarterial chemoembolization for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2015; 26: 1622–1629.
- 73Morimoto M, Kobayashi S, Moriya S et al. Short-term efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization with epirubicin-loaded superabsorbent polymer microspheres for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with conventional transarterial chemoembolization. Abdom Radiol 2017; 42: 612–619.
- 74Bolondi L, Burroughs A, Dufour JF et al. Heterogeneity of patients with intermediate (BCLC B) hepatocellular carcinoma: proposal for a subclassification to facilitate treatment decisions. Semin Liver Dis 2012; 32: 348–359.
- 75Ha Y, Shim JH, Kim SO, Kim KM, Lim YS, Lee HC. Clinical appraisal of the recently proposed Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B subclassification by survival analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 29: 787–793.
- 76Yamakado K, Miyayama S, Hirota S et al. Subgrouping of intermediate-stage (BCLC stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma based on tumor number and size and Child-Pugh grade correlated with prognosis after transarterial chemoembolization. Jpn J Radiol 2014; 32: 260–265.
- 77Kudo M, Arizumi T, Ueshima K, Sakurai T, Kitano M, Nishida N. Subclassification of BCLC B stage hepatocellular carcinoma and treatment strategies: proposal of modified Bolondi's subclassification (Kinki criteria). Dig Dis 2015; 33: 751–758.
- 78Lee S, Kim BK, Song K et al. Subclassification of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B and C hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study of the multicenter registry database. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 31: 842–847.
- 79Hiraoka A, Kumada T, Nouso K et al. Proposed new sub-grouping for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma using albumin-bilirubin grade. Oncology 2016; 91: 153–161.
- 80Hiraoka A, Kumada T, Michitaka K et al. Usefulness of albumin-bilirubin grade for evaluation of prognosis of 2584 Japanese patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 31: 1031–1036.
- 81Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL et al. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg 1973; 60: 646–649.
- 82Ogasawara S, Chiba T, Ooka Y et al. Efficacy of sorafenib in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to transarterial chemoembolization. Oncology 2014; 87: 330–341.
- 83Arizumi T, Ueshima K, Minami T et al. Effectiveness of sorafenib in patients with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) refractory and intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Liv Cancer 2015; 4: 253–262.
- 84Ohki T, Kondo M, Karasawa Y et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of sorafenib on overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using FT rate: a devised index. Adv Ther 2017; 34: 1097–1108.
- 85Peck-Radosavljevic M, Kudo M, Raoul JL et al. Outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE): global OPTIMIS final analysis. ASCO 2018 Abstract 4018. https://meetinglibrary.asco.org/record/160079/abstract
- 86Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 378–390.
- 87Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 25–34.
- 88Cheng AL, Kang YK, Lin DY et al. Sunitinib versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular cancer: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 4067–4075.
- 89Johnson PJ, Qin S, Park JW et al. Brivanib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-FL study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3517–3524.
- 90Cainap C, Qin S, Huang WT et al. Linifanib versus sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 2014; 33: 172–179.
- 91Zhu AX, Rosmorduc O, Evans TRJ et al. SEARCH: a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sorafenib plus erlotinib in patients with sdvanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2014; 33: 559–566.
- 92Kudo M, Finn R, Qin S et al. A randomised phase 3 trial of lenvatinib vs. sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 2018; 391(10126): 1163–1173.
- 93Llovet JM, Decaens T, Raoul JL et al. Brivanib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were intolerant to sorafenib or for whom sorafenib failed: results from the randomized phase III BRISK-PS study. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 3509–3516.
- 94Zhu AX, Kudo M, Assenat E et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of sorafenib. The EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2014; 312: 57–67.
- 95Zhu AX, Park JO, Ryoo BY et al. Ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following first-line therapy with sorafenib (REACH): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 859–870.
- 96Rimassa L, Assenat E, Peck-Radosavljevic M et al. Tivantinib for second-line treatment of MET-high, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (METIV-HCC): a final analysis of a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 682–693.
- 97Kobayashi S, Ueshima K, Moriguchi M et al. JET-HCC: a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tivantinib as a second-line therapy in patients with c-Met high hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2017; 28(Suppl_5): mdx369.003.
10.1093/annonc/mdx369.003 Google Scholar
- 98Abou-Alfa G, Qin S, Ryoo BY et al. ADI-PEG 20 plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2018; 29: 1402–1408.
- 99Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P et al. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017; 389(10064): 56–66.
- 100Abou-Alfa GK, Meyer T, Cheng A-L et al. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced and progressing hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 54–63.
- 101Zhu A, Kang YK, Yen CJ et al. REACH-2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of ramucirumab versus placebo as second-line treatment in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) following first-line sorafenib. ASCO 2018 annual meeting, Abstract 4003.
- 102Okita K, Izumi N, Matsui O et al. Peretinoin after curative therapy of hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Gastroenterol 2015; 50: 191–202.
- 103Bruix J, Takayama T, Mazzaferro V et al. Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16: 1344–1354.
- 104Kudo M, Imanaka K, Chida N et al. Phase III study of sorafenib after transarterial chemoembolisation in Japanese and Korean patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2011; 47: 2117–2127.
- 105Kudo M, Han G, Finn RS et al. Brivanib as adjuvant therapy to transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized phase III trial. Hepatology 2014; 60: 1697–1707.
- 106Lencioni R, Llovet JM, Han G et al. Sorafenib or placebo plus TACE with doxorubicin-eluting beads for intermediate stage HCC: the SPACE trial. J Hepatol 2016; 64: 1090–1098.
- 107Kudo M, Cheng A-L, Park J-W et al. Orantinib versus placebo combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENTAL): a randomised, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase 3 study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3: 37–46.
- 108Meyer T, Fox R, Ma YT et al. Sorafenib in combination with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (TACE 2): a randomised placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2: 565–575.